Literature DB >> 30029215

Contour interaction under photopic and scotopic conditions.

Lenka Musilová1, František Pluhácek1, Stephanie M Marten-Ellis2, Harold E Bedell2, John Siderov3.   

Abstract

In the present study, we asked whether contour interaction undergoes significant changes for different luminance levels in the central and peripheral visual field. This study included nine normal observers at two laboratories (five at Palacky University Olomouc, Czech Republic and four at the University of Houston, USA). Observers viewed a randomly selected Sloan letter surrounded by four equally spaced bars for several separations measured edge-to-edge in min arc. Stimuli were viewed foveally under photopic and mesopic luminances and between 5° and 12° peripherally for four different background luminances of the display monitors, corresponding to photopic, mesopic, scotopic, and dim scotopic levels. The extent of the contour interaction in the fovea is approximately 20 times smaller than in the periphery. Whereas the magnitude of foveal contour interaction markedly decreases with decreasing luminance, no consistent luminance-induced change occurs in peripheral contour interaction. The extent of contour interaction does not scale with the size of the target letter, either in the fovea or peripherally. The results support a neural origin of contour interaction consistent with the properties of center-surround antagonism.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30029215      PMCID: PMC6005630          DOI: 10.1167/18.6.5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  39 in total

1.  The extent of crowding in peripheral vision does not scale with target size.

Authors:  Srimant P Tripathy; Patrick Cavanagh
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  CONTOUR INTERACTION AND VISUAL RESOLUTION: CONTRALATERAL EFFECTS.

Authors:  M C FLOM; G G HEATH; E TAKAHASHI
Journal:  Science       Date:  1963-11-15       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Change of organization in the receptive fields of the cat's retina during dark adaptation.

Authors:  H B BARLOW; R FITZHUGH; S W KUFFLER
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1957-08-06       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  "Crowding" in normal and amblyopic vision assessed with Gaussian and Gabor C's.

Authors:  Srividhya Hariharan; Dennis M Levi; Stanley A Klein
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  The nature of letter crowding as revealed by first- and second-order classification images.

Authors:  Anirvan S Nandy; Bosco S Tjan
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2007-02-07       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Receptive field properties of neurons in the primary visual cortex under photopic and scotopic lighting conditions.

Authors:  Kevin R Duffy; David H Hubel
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2007-08-03       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Foveal contour interaction on the edge: response to 'Letter-to-the-Editor' by Drs. Coates and Levi.

Authors:  John Siderov; Sarah J Waugh; Harold E Bedell
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2013-12-30       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Contrast dissimilarity effects on crowding are not simply another case of target saliency.

Authors:  Einat Rashal; Yaffa Yeshurun
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-12-04       Impact factor: 2.240

9.  Spatial and chromatic interactions in the lateral geniculate body of the rhesus monkey.

Authors:  T N Wiesel; D H Hubel
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1966-11       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Contour interaction as a function of retinal eccentricity.

Authors:  G Wolford; L Chambers
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1984-11
View more
  3 in total

1.  Cortical distance unifies the extent of parafoveal contour interactions.

Authors:  Daniel R Coates; Xiaoyun Jiang; Dennis M Levi; Ramkumar Sabesan
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  A Comparison of Foveal and Peripheral Contour Interaction and Crowding.

Authors:  Stephanie M Marten-Ellis; Harold E Bedell
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2021-01-01       Impact factor: 2.106

3.  Reduced fixation stability induced by peripheral viewing does not contribute to crowding.

Authors:  Rajkumar Nallour Raveendran; Arun Kumar Krishnan; Benjamin Thompson
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 2.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.