Literature DB >> 15616272

Differences in the Enterococcus faecalis lsa locus that influence susceptibility to quinupristin-dalfopristin and clindamycin.

Kavindra V Singh1, Barbara E Murray.   

Abstract

We have previously shown that the Enterococcus faecalis lsa gene, encoding the putative ABC protein Lsa, influences resistance to quinupristin-dalfopristin (Q-D) and clindamycin (CLI). We have now found that, while cloned lsa from E. faecalis strain V583 (lsa(V)) fully restored resistance to Q-D, CLI, and dalfopristin (DAL) lost by the OG1 lsa disruption mutant TX5332 and also caused increased MICs for Lactococcus lactis LM2301, cloned lsa from OG1 (lsa(OG)) did not cause any increase in MICs for either species. Sequencing of ca. 2 kb of these two lsa alleles found differences between lsa(OG) and lsa(V) in the upstream region as well as in the 5' and 3' halves of the lsa gene. To investigate the reason for the phenotypic differences expressed by the two cloned loci, 5' half plus 3' half hybrid constructs were created. When introduced into both TX5332 and L. lactis, cloned lsa(V5)(')(OG3)(') conferred increases in MICs of Q-D, CLI, and DAL similar to those of cloned lsa(V) while cloned lsa(OG5)(')(V3)(') showed a moderate increase in MICs relative to those of lsa(OG), indicating that both halves of the locus can influence resistance expression. After site-directed mutagenesis of the cloned lsa alleles at positions -131 and -133 (relative to the putative Lsa start codon ATG), which converted two A's of lsa(V) to the G and T of lsa(OG) and vice versa, MIC testing showed that mutagenized lsa(OG) (lsa(OG-M)) was strongly influenced by these changes in terms of conferring increased MICs of Q-D, CLI, and DAL relative to lsa(OG) while the phenotype of mutagenized lsa(V) (lsa(V-M)) was less influenced, with moderately decreased MICs, primarily to CLI, relative to lsa(V). In conclusion, this study found that changes in different regions of the E. faecalis lsa locus influence the ability of cloned lsa to confer resistance to Q-D, CLI, and DAL.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15616272      PMCID: PMC538898          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.49.1.32-39.2005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  25 in total

Review 1.  Enterococcus faecalis multi-drug resistance transporters: application for antibiotic discovery.

Authors:  D R Davis; J B McAlpine; C J Pazoles; M K Talbot; E A Alder; C White; B M Jonas; B E Murray; G M Weinstock; B L Rogers
Journal:  J Mol Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2001-04

2.  Role of mobile DNA in the evolution of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecalis.

Authors:  I T Paulsen; L Banerjei; G S A Myers; K E Nelson; R Seshadri; T D Read; D E Fouts; J A Eisen; S R Gill; J F Heidelberg; H Tettelin; R J Dodson; L Umayam; L Brinkac; M Beanan; S Daugherty; R T DeBoy; S Durkin; J Kolonay; R Madupu; W Nelson; J Vamathevan; B Tran; J Upton; T Hansen; J Shetty; H Khouri; T Utterback; D Radune; K A Ketchum; B A Dougherty; C M Fraser
Journal:  Science       Date:  2003-03-28       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  In vitro activity of 19 antimicrobial agents against enterococci from healthy subjects and hospitalized patients and use of an ace gene probe from Enterococcus faecalis for species identification.

Authors:  R W Duh; K V Singh; K Malathum; B E Murray
Journal:  Microb Drug Resist       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 3.431

Review 4.  The ABC of ABCS: a phylogenetic and functional classification of ABC systems in living organisms.

Authors:  E Dassa; P Bouige
Journal:  Res Microbiol       Date:  2001 Apr-May       Impact factor: 3.992

5.  An Enterococcus faecalis ABC homologue (Lsa) is required for the resistance of this species to clindamycin and quinupristin-dalfopristin.

Authors:  Kavindra V Singh; George M Weinstock; Barbara E Murray
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Effects of Enterococcus faecalis fsr genes on production of gelatinase and a serine protease and virulence.

Authors:  X Qin; K V Singh; G M Weinstock; B E Murray
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 3.441

7.  Restriction endonuclease analysis of the lactose plasmid in Streptococcus lactis ML3 and two recombinant lactose plasmids.

Authors:  P M Walsh; L L McKay
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1982-05       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  Msr(A) and related macrolide/streptogramin resistance determinants: incomplete transporters?

Authors:  Elinor Reynolds; Jeremy I Ross; Jonathan H Cove
Journal:  Int J Antimicrob Agents       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 5.283

9.  Generation and testing of mutants of Enterococcus faecalis in a mouse peritonitis model.

Authors:  K V Singh; X Qin; G M Weinstock; B E Murray
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 5.226

10.  Nonsense mutations in the lsa-like gene in Enterococcus faecalis isolates susceptible to lincosamides and Streptogramins A.

Authors:  Julia Dina; Brigitte Malbruny; Roland Leclercq
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 5.191

View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  Antibiotics and gastrointestinal colonization by vancomycin-resistant enterococci.

Authors:  L B Rice
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.267

2.  Antibiotic resistance among cultured bacterial isolates from bioethanol fermentation facilities across the United States.

Authors:  Colin A Murphree; E Patrick Heist; Luke A Moe
Journal:  Curr Microbiol       Date:  2014-04-20       Impact factor: 2.188

3.  Genetic basis for in vitro and in vivo resistance to lincosamides, streptogramins A, and pleuromutilins (LSAP phenotype) in Enterococcus faecium.

Authors:  Christophe Isnard; Brigitte Malbruny; Roland Leclercq; Vincent Cattoir
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2013-07-08       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 4.  Management of multidrug-resistant enterococcal infections.

Authors:  C A Arias; G A Contreras; B E Murray
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 8.067

5.  Human enterococcal isolates as reservoirs for macrolide-lincosamide-streptogramin and other resistance genes.

Authors:  Milena Mišić; Branislava Kocić; Aleksandra Arsović; Jelena Čukić; Dejan Vidanović; Milanko Šekler; Dejan Baskić
Journal:  J Antibiot (Tokyo)       Date:  2022-05-26       Impact factor: 3.424

6.  A trilocus sequence typing scheme for hospital epidemiology and subspecies differentiation of an important nosocomial pathogen, Enterococcus faecalis.

Authors:  Shahreen A Chowdhury; Cesar A Arias; Sreedhar R Nallapareddy; Jinnethe Reyes; Rob J L Willems; Barbara E Murray
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2009-07-01       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  A genomic view of food-related and probiotic Enterococcus strains.

Authors:  Julieta Bonacina; Nadia Suárez; Ricardo Hormigo; Silvina Fadda; Marcus Lechner; Lucila Saavedra
Journal:  DNA Res       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 4.458

8.  Antibiotic-resistant enterococci and fecal indicators in surface water and groundwater impacted by a concentrated Swine feeding operation.

Authors:  Amy R Sapkota; Frank C Curriero; Kristen E Gibson; Kellogg J Schwab
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 9.031

9.  A multiple antibiotic-resistant enterobacter cloacae strain isolated from a bioethanol fermentation facility.

Authors:  Colin A Murphree; Qing Li; E Patrick Heist; Luke A Moe
Journal:  Microbes Environ       Date:  2014-06-17       Impact factor: 2.912

10.  Prevalence of Genotypes That Determine Resistance of Staphylococci to Macrolides and Lincosamides in Serbia.

Authors:  Milena Mišić; Jelena Čukić; Dejan Vidanović; Milanko Šekler; Sanja Matić; Mihailo Vukašinović; Dejan Baskić
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2017-08-28
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.