Literature DB >> 24748439

Antibiotic resistance among cultured bacterial isolates from bioethanol fermentation facilities across the United States.

Colin A Murphree1, E Patrick Heist, Luke A Moe.   

Abstract

Bacterial contamination of fuel ethanol fermentations by lactic acid bacteria (LAB) can have crippling effects on bioethanol production. Producers have had success controlling bacterial growth through prophylactic addition of antibiotics to fermentors, yet concerns have arisen about antibiotic resistance among the LAB. Here, we report on mechanisms used by 32 LAB isolates from eight different US bioethanol facilities to persist under conditions of antibiotic stress. Minimum inhibitory concentration assays with penicillin, erythromycin, and virginiamycin revealed broad resistance to each of the antibiotics as well as high levels of resistance to individual antibiotics. Phenotypic assays revealed that antibiotic inactivation mechanisms contributed to the high levels of individual resistances among the isolates, especially to erythromycin and virginiamycin, yet none of the isolates appeared to use a β-lactamase. Biofilm formation was noted among the majority of the isolates and may contribute to persistence under low levels of antibiotics. Nearly all of the isolates carried at least one canonical antibiotic resistance gene and many carried more than one. The erythromycin ribosomal methyltransferase (erm) gene class was found in 19 of 32 isolates, yet a number of these isolates exhibit little to no resistance to erythromycin. The erm genes were present in 15 isolates that encoded more than one antibiotic resistance mechanism, suggestive of potential genetic linkages.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24748439     DOI: 10.1007/s00284-014-0583-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Microbiol        ISSN: 0343-8651            Impact factor:   2.188


  39 in total

1.  Linkage of vat(E) and erm(B) in streptogamin-resistant Enterococcus faecium isolates from Europe.

Authors:  L B Jensen; A M Hammerum; F M Aarestrup
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Differences in the Enterococcus faecalis lsa locus that influence susceptibility to quinupristin-dalfopristin and clindamycin.

Authors:  Kavindra V Singh; Barbara E Murray
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Sequence of a staphylococcal plasmid gene, vga, encoding a putative ATP-binding protein involved in resistance to virginiamycin A-like antibiotics.

Authors:  J Allignet; V Loncle; N el Sohl
Journal:  Gene       Date:  1992-08-01       Impact factor: 3.688

Review 4.  Genetic elements responsible for erythromycin resistance in streptococci.

Authors:  Pietro E Varaldo; Maria Pia Montanari; Eleonora Giovanetti
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2008-11-10       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 5.  Update on macrolide-lincosamide-streptogramin, ketolide, and oxazolidinone resistance genes.

Authors:  Marilyn C Roberts
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Lett       Date:  2008-04-09       Impact factor: 2.742

Review 6.  Antibiotic resistance in food lactic acid bacteria--a review.

Authors:  Shalini Mathur; Rameshwar Singh
Journal:  Int J Food Microbiol       Date:  2005-11-08       Impact factor: 5.277

7.  An Enterococcus faecalis ABC homologue (Lsa) is required for the resistance of this species to clindamycin and quinupristin-dalfopristin.

Authors:  Kavindra V Singh; George M Weinstock; Barbara E Murray
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  Disruption of an Enterococcus faecium species-specific gene, a homologue of acquired macrolide resistance genes of staphylococci, is associated with an increase in macrolide susceptibility.

Authors:  K V Singh; K Malathum; B E Murray
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  Prevalence of the erm(T) gene in clinical isolates of erythromycin-resistant group D Streptococcus and Enterococcus.

Authors:  Linda P DiPersio; Joseph R DiPersio; Kevin C Frey; Jacqueline A Beach
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2008-02-19       Impact factor: 5.191

10.  Antibiotic susceptibility patterns and resistance genes of starter cultures and probiotic bacteria used in food.

Authors:  Sabine Kastner; Vincent Perreten; Helen Bleuler; Gabriel Hugenschmidt; Christophe Lacroix; Leo Meile
Journal:  Syst Appl Microbiol       Date:  2005-08-18       Impact factor: 4.022

View more
  7 in total

1.  Characterization of microbial communities in ethanol biorefineries.

Authors:  Fernanda C Firmino; Davide Porcellato; Madison Cox; Garret Suen; Jeffery R Broadbent; James L Steele
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2019-12-17       Impact factor: 3.346

2.  Combination of natural antimicrobials for contamination control in ethanol production.

Authors:  Natalia Janaina Lago Maia; Jessica Audrey Feijó Corrêa; Rachel Tereza Rigotti; Anisio Antonio da Silva Junior; Fernando Bittencourt Luciano
Journal:  World J Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2019-10-08       Impact factor: 3.312

3.  Bacterial Community Structure and Dynamics During Corn-Based Bioethanol Fermentation.

Authors:  Qing Li; E Patrick Heist; Luke A Moe
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2015-09-17       Impact factor: 4.552

4.  Yeast Derived LysA2 Can Control Bacterial Contamination in Ethanol Fermentation.

Authors:  Jun-Seob Kim; M Angela Daum; Yong-Su Jin; Michael J Miller
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2018-05-24       Impact factor: 5.048

5.  A multiple antibiotic-resistant enterobacter cloacae strain isolated from a bioethanol fermentation facility.

Authors:  Colin A Murphree; Qing Li; E Patrick Heist; Luke A Moe
Journal:  Microbes Environ       Date:  2014-06-17       Impact factor: 2.912

6.  Effects of low concentrations of erythromycin, penicillin, and virginiamycin on bacterial resistance development in vitro.

Authors:  Beilei Ge; Kelly J Domesle; Qianru Yang; Shenia R Young; Crystal L Rice-Trujillo; Sonya M Bodeis Jones; Stuart A Gaines; Marla W Keller; Xin Li; Silvia A Piñeiro; Brooke M Whitney; Heather C Harbottle; Jeffrey M Gilbert
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-09-08       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Natural antibacterial agents from arid-region pretreated lignocellulosic biomasses and extracts for the control of lactic acid bacteria in yeast fermentation.

Authors:  Sabeera Haris; Chuanji Fang; Juan-Rodrigo Bastidas-Oyanedel; Kristala Jones Prather; Jens Ejbye Schmidt; Mette Hedegaard Thomsen
Journal:  AMB Express       Date:  2018-08-06       Impact factor: 3.298

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.