Literature DB >> 18684498

What women with ovarian cancer think and know about genetic testing.

Robin A Lacour1, Molly S Daniels, Shannon N Westin, Larissa A Meyer, Catherine C Burke, Kimberly A Burns, Shiney Kurian, Nicki F Webb, Terri B Pustilnik, Karen H Lu.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Few women with ovarian cancer undergo genetic testing for the Breast and Ovarian Cancer susceptibility genes, BRCA1 and BRCA2. With the prospect of BRCA-directed therapeutics, we investigated ovarian cancer patients' knowledge and willingness to undergo genetic testing.
METHODS: All ovarian cancer patients seen in the Gynecology Center of a cancer center and a private clinic were asked to complete an anonymous questionnaire regarding knowledge and willingness to undergo BRCA testing. Women who had prior genetic testing were asked not to participate. Data was analyzed using Fisher's exact test.
RESULTS: Two-hundred and thirty seven ovarian cancer patients voluntarily completed the questionnaire. Fifty-five percent (131/237) of participants had not heard of BRCA testing. Of Caucasian respondents, 51% were unaware of BRCA testing, compared to 70% of Hispanic and 88% of African American respondents (p=0.008). Awareness was correlated with education (p<0.001). Eighty-nine percent of participants were willing to be tested if it would directly affect their therapy and 86.9% would be tested to benefit their family. Seventy-four percent of patients would pay 20% of the cost of testing, only 25.1% would pay in full.
CONCLUSIONS: A majority of women with ovarian cancer are not aware of the availability of BRCA testing. This lack of awareness is more profound in minorities. Despite lack of knowledge, most patients would undergo testing if it would impact their care. However, cost may be a barrier. Given the willingness of patients to undergo testing and the possibility of targeted therapy, clinicians who care for these patients should work to make appropriate genetic counseling referrals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18684498      PMCID: PMC3746752          DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.06.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Oncol        ISSN: 0090-8258            Impact factor:   5.482


  15 in total

1.  Psychosocial factors associated with the public's willingness to pay for genetic testing for cancer risk: a structural equations model.

Authors:  K Bosompra; T Ashikaga; B S Flynn; J K Worden; L J Solomon
Journal:  Health Educ Res       Date:  2001-04

2.  Testing the construct validity of willingness to pay valuations using objective information about risk and health benefit.

Authors:  Zoë Philips; David K Whynes; Mark Avis
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 3.046

3.  Increased uptake of BRCA1/2 genetic testing among African American women with a recent diagnosis of breast cancer.

Authors:  Lisa R Susswein; Cécile Skrzynia; Leslie A Lange; Jessica K Booker; Mark L Graham; James P Evans
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-01-01       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations account for a large proportion of ovarian carcinoma cases.

Authors:  Tuya Pal; Jenny Permuth-Wey; Judith A Betts; Jeffrey P Krischer; James Fiorica; Hector Arango; James LaPolla; Mitchell Hoffman; Martin A Martino; Katie Wakeley; George Wilbanks; Santo Nicosia; Alan Cantor; Rebecca Sutphen
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2005-12-15       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  The decision to test in women receiving genetic counseling for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations.

Authors:  Kimberly Kelly; Howard Leventhal; Michael Andrykowski; Deborah Toppmeyer; Judie Much; James Dermody; Monica Marvin; Jill Baran; Marvin Schwalb
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 2.537

6.  Clinical characteristics of individuals with germline mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2: analysis of 10,000 individuals.

Authors:  Thomas S Frank; Amie M Deffenbaugh; Julia E Reid; Mark Hulick; Brian E Ward; Beth Lingenfelter; Kathi L Gumpper; Thomas Scholl; Sean V Tavtigian; Dmitry R Pruss; Gregory C Critchfield
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2002-03-15       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Society of Gynecologic Oncologists Education Committee statement on risk assessment for inherited gynecologic cancer predispositions.

Authors:  Johnathan M Lancaster; C Bethan Powell; Noah D Kauff; Ilana Cass; Lee-May Chen; Karen H Lu; David G Mutch; Andrew Berchuck; Beth Y Karlan; Thomas J Herzog
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 5.482

8.  Barriers to participating in genetic counseling and BRCA testing during primary treatment for breast cancer.

Authors:  Kathryn J Schlich-Bakker; Herman F J ten Kroode; Carla C Wárlám-Rodenhuis; Jan van den Bout; Margreet G E M Ausems
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 8.822

9.  Psychosocial predictors of BRCA counseling and testing decisions among urban African-American women.

Authors:  Hayley S Thompson; Heiddis B Valdimarsdottir; Chantal Duteau-Buck; Josephine Guevarra; Dana H Bovbjerg; Cassandra Richmond-Avellaneda; David Amarel; Diana Godfrey; Karen Brown; Kenneth Offit
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 4.254

10.  Deficiency in the repair of DNA damage by homologous recombination and sensitivity to poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibition.

Authors:  Nuala McCabe; Nicholas C Turner; Christopher J Lord; Katarzyna Kluzek; Aneta Bialkowska; Sally Swift; Sabrina Giavara; Mark J O'Connor; Andrew N Tutt; Małgorzata Z Zdzienicka; Graeme C M Smith; Alan Ashworth
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2006-08-15       Impact factor: 12.701

View more
  28 in total

1.  Evaluating women with ovarian cancer for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations: missed opportunities.

Authors:  Larissa A Meyer; Meaghan E Anderson; Robin A Lacour; Anuj Suri; Molly S Daniels; Diana L Urbauer; Graciela M Nogueras-Gonzalez; Kathleen M Schmeler; David M Gershenson; Karen H Lu
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 7.661

2.  Concerns about cancer risk and experiences with genetic testing in a diverse population of patients with breast cancer.

Authors:  Reshma Jagsi; Kent A Griffith; Allison W Kurian; Monica Morrow; Ann S Hamilton; John J Graff; Steven J Katz; Sarah T Hawley
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-04-06       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Adherence patterns to National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines for referral to cancer genetic professionals.

Authors:  Terri Febbraro; Katina Robison; Jennifer Scalia Wilbur; Jessica Laprise; Amy Bregar; Vrishali Lopes; Robert Legare; Ashley Stuckey
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2015-04-28       Impact factor: 5.482

4.  Underestimation of risk of a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation in women with high-grade serous ovarian cancer by BRCAPRO: a multi-institution study.

Authors:  Molly S Daniels; Sheri A Babb; Robin H King; Diana L Urbauer; Brittany A L Batte; Amanda C Brandt; Christopher I Amos; Adam H Buchanan; David G Mutch; Karen H Lu
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-03-17       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Bumps along the translational pathway: anticipating uptake of tailored smoking cessation treatment.

Authors:  Alexandra Elizabeth Shields; Mehdi Najafzadeh; Anna Boonin Schachter
Journal:  Per Med       Date:  2013-11-01       Impact factor: 2.512

6.  Cancer Genetic Counseling and Testing: Perspectives of Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Patients and Gynecologic Oncology Healthcare Providers.

Authors:  Margaret I Liang; Deanna H Wong; Christine S Walsh; Robin Farias-Eisner; Joshua G Cohen
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2017-08-07       Impact factor: 2.537

7.  Important considerations for recruiting women to cancer genetics studies in Puerto Rico.

Authors:  Euna M August; Gwen P Quinn; Rossybelle Perales; Zuheily Closser; Julie Dutil; Marieva Puig; Susan T Vadaparampil
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 2.037

8.  Parental knowledge and attitudes toward hypertrophic cardiomyopathy genetic testing.

Authors:  Sara M Fitzgerald-Butt; Lindsey Byrne; Cynthia A Gerhardt; Kathryn Vannatta; Timothy M Hoffman; Kim L McBride
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2009-12-01       Impact factor: 1.655

9.  Genetic risk assessment for women with epithelial ovarian cancer: referral patterns and outcomes in a university gynecologic oncology clinic.

Authors:  Sue V Petzel; Rachel Isaksson Vogel; Tracy Bensend; Anna Leininger; Peter A Argenta; Melissa A Geller
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2013-05-16       Impact factor: 2.537

10.  A pilot study of hereditary breast and ovarian knowledge among a multiethnic group of Hispanic women with a personal or family history of cancer.

Authors:  Susan T Vadaparampil; Gwendolyn P Quinn; Brent J Small; Jessica McIntyre; Claudia Aguado Loi; Zuheily Closser; Clement K Gwede
Journal:  Genet Test Mol Biomarkers       Date:  2010-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.