Literature DB >> 28730553

Younger Age is an Independent Factor for Graft Weight Overestimation: Analysis of the Clinical Impact on Recipient Outcomes in 340 Japanese Living Liver Donors.

Toshihiro Kitajima1, Toshimi Kaido2, Tetsuya Tajima1, Tadahiro Uemura1, Yasuhiro Fujimoto3, Andrea Schenk4, Shinji Uemoto1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Accurate preoperative estimation of graft weight is essential for improving outcomes in living donor liver transplantation.
METHODS: This retrospective study sought to identify factors associated with graft weight overestimation. From April 2006 to August 2015, 340 living donors were assigned to no-overestimate (n = 284) or overestimate (n = 56) groups. We defined graft weight overestimation as a discrepancy ≥15% between estimated graft volume and actual graft weight. Donor data were compared, and associated factors for graft weight overestimation were analyzed. Recipient outcomes were compared between the groups according to identified factors.
RESULTS: Donors were significantly younger in the overestimate group than in the no-overestimate group (35.0 vs. 46.0 years; p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis identified donor age <45 years as an independent risk factor for graft weight overestimation (odds ratio 2.068; 95% confidence interval 1.114-3.839; p = 0.021). Among recipients with donors <45 years (n = 168), incidence of small-for-size dysfunction (SFSD) was significantly higher in the overestimate group than in the no-overestimate group (7/37 patients vs. 7/131 patients; p = 0.016); no significant difference was observed among recipients with donors ≥45 years (n = 172). First-year mortality was lower in SFSD recipients with donors <45 years (14.3 vs. 60.9%, p = 0.007). Among recipients with younger donors, graft survival was not significantly different between overestimate and no-overestimate groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Younger donor age was an independent risk factor for graft weight overestimation leading to SFSD in recipients, but did not impair graft survival.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 28730553     DOI: 10.1007/s00268-017-4140-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Surg        ISSN: 0364-2313            Impact factor:   3.352


  28 in total

1.  3D CT modeling of hepatic vessel architecture and volume calculation in living donated liver transplantation.

Authors:  Bernd B Frericks; Franco C Caldarone; Björn Nashan; Dagmar Högemann Savellano; Georg Stamm; Timm D Kirchhoff; Hoen-Oh Shin; Andrea Schenk; Dirk Selle; Wolf Spindler; Jürgen Klempnauer; Heinz-Otto Peitgen; Michael Galanski
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2003-12-10       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Analysis of vasculature for liver surgical planning.

Authors:  Dirk Selle; Bernhard Preim; Andrea Schenk; Heinz-Otto Peitgen
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 10.048

3.  A simple new formula to assess liver weight.

Authors:  T Yoshizumi; G E Gondolesi; C A Bodian; H Jeon; M E Schwartz; T M Fishbein; C M Miller; S Emre
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 1.066

4.  Potential living liver donors: evaluation with an all-in-one protocol with multi-detector row CT.

Authors:  Tobias Schroeder; Silvio Nadalin; Jörg Stattaus; Jörg F Debatin; Massimo Malagó; Stefan G Ruehm
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Lower limit of the graft-to-recipient weight ratio can be safely reduced to 0.6% in adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation in combination with portal pressure control.

Authors:  T Kaido; A Mori; Y Ogura; K Hata; A Yoshizawa; T Iida; S Yagi; S Uemoto
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  2011 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.066

Review 6.  Small-for-size syndrome after partial liver transplantation: definition, mechanisms of disease and clinical implications.

Authors:  Felix Dahm; Panco Georgiev; Pierre-Alain Clavien
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 8.086

7.  Coefficient factor for graft weight estimation from preoperative computed tomography volumetry in living donor liver transplantation.

Authors:  Tetsuji Yoneyama; Katsuhiro Asonuma; Hideaki Okajima; Kwang-Jong Lee; Hidekazu Yamamoto; Takayuki Takeichi; Yoshiharu Nakayama; Yukihiro Inomata
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 5.799

8.  Left lobe graft poses a potential risk of hepatic venous outflow obstruction in adult living donor liver transplantation.

Authors:  Toshihiro Kitajima; Toshimi Kaido; Taku Iida; Shintaro Yagi; Yasuhiro Fujimoto; Kohei Ogawa; Akira Mori; Hideaki Okajima; Rinpei Imamine; Toshiya Shibata; Shinji Uemoto
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 5.799

9.  A new formula for calculating standard liver volume for living donor liver transplantation without using body weight.

Authors:  Takashi Kokudo; Kiyoshi Hasegawa; Emilie Uldry; Yutaka Matsuyama; Junichi Kaneko; Nobuhisa Akamatsu; Taku Aoki; Yoshihiro Sakamoto; Nicolas Demartines; Yasuhiko Sugawara; Norihiro Kokudo; Nermin Halkic
Journal:  J Hepatol       Date:  2015-06-06       Impact factor: 25.083

10.  How far can we lower graft-to-recipient weight ratio for living donor liver transplantation under modulation of portal venous pressure?

Authors:  Tadahiro Uemura; Seidai Wada; Toshimi Kaido; Akira Mori; Yasuhiro Ogura; Shintaro Yagi; Yasuhiro Fujimoto; Kohei Ogawa; Koichiro Hata; Atsushi Yoshizawa; Hideaki Okajima; Shinji Uemoto
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2016-02-28       Impact factor: 3.982

View more
  1 in total

1.  Clinical Outcome of Residual Liver Volume and Hepatic Steatosis After Right-Lobe Living-Donor Hepatectomy.

Authors:  Chia-En Hsieh; Kuo-Hua Lin; Ya-Lan Hsu; Chen-Te Chou; Chia-Bang Chen; Ping-Yi Lin; Chia-Cheng Lin; Yu-Ju Hung; Li-Chueh Weng; Yao-Li Chen
Journal:  Ann Transplant       Date:  2020-03-10       Impact factor: 1.530

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.