Jieun Byun1, Seung Soo Lee2, Yu Sub Sung1, Youngbin Shin1, Jessica Yun1, Ho Sung Kim1, Eun Sil Yu3, Sung-Gyu Lee4, Moon-Gyu Lee1. 1. Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88 Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, South Korea. 2. Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88 Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, South Korea. seungsoolee@amc.seoul.kr. 3. Department of Diagnostic Pathology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88 Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, South Korea. 4. Division of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88 Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, South Korea.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To compare the performances of CT indices for diagnosing hepatic steatosis (HS) and to determine and validate the CT index cut-off values. METHODS: Three indices were measured on non-enhanced CT images of 4413 living liver donor candidates (2939 men, 1474 women; mean age, 31.4 years): hepatic attenuation (CTL), hepatic attenuation minus splenic attenuation (CTL-S), and hepatic attenuation divided by splenic attenuation (CTL/S). The performances of these CT indices in diagnosing HS, relative to pathologic diagnosis, were compared in the development cohort of 3312 subjects by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. The cut-off values for diagnosing HS > 33% in the development cohort were determined at 95% specificity and 95% sensitivity using bootstrap ROC analysis, and the diagnostic performance of these cut-off values was validated in the test cohort of 1101 subjects. RESULTS: CTL-S showed the highest performance for diagnosing HS ≥ 5% and HS > 33% (areas under the curve (AUCs) = 0.737 and 0.926, respectively), followed by CTL/S (AUCs = 0.732 and 0.925, respectively) and CTL (AUCs = 0.707 and 0.880, respectively). For CT scans using 120 kVp, the CTL-S cut-off values for highly specific (i.e., - 2.1) and highly sensitive (i.e., 7.6) diagnosis of HS > 33% resulted in a specificity of 96.4% with a sensitivity of 64.0% and a sensitivity of 97.3% with a specificity of 54.9%, respectively, in the test cohort. CONCLUSION: CT indices using liver and spleen attenuations have higher performance for diagnosing HS than indices using liver attenuation alone. The CTL-S cut-off values in this study may have utility for diagnosing HS in clinical practice and research. KEY POINTS: • CT indices based on both liver attenuation and spleen attenuation (CTL-Sand CTL/S) have higher diagnostic performance than CTLbased on liver attenuation alone in diagnosing HS using various CT techniques. • The CT index cut-off values determined in this study can be utilized for reliable diagnosis or to rule out subjects with moderate to severe HS in clinical practice and research, including the selection of living liver donors and the development of cohorts with HS or healthy controls.
OBJECTIVES: To compare the performances of CT indices for diagnosing hepatic steatosis (HS) and to determine and validate the CT index cut-off values. METHODS: Three indices were measured on non-enhanced CT images of 4413 living liver donor candidates (2939 men, 1474 women; mean age, 31.4 years): hepatic attenuation (CTL), hepatic attenuation minus splenic attenuation (CTL-S), and hepatic attenuation divided by splenic attenuation (CTL/S). The performances of these CT indices in diagnosing HS, relative to pathologic diagnosis, were compared in the development cohort of 3312 subjects by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. The cut-off values for diagnosing HS > 33% in the development cohort were determined at 95% specificity and 95% sensitivity using bootstrap ROC analysis, and the diagnostic performance of these cut-off values was validated in the test cohort of 1101 subjects. RESULTS: CTL-S showed the highest performance for diagnosing HS ≥ 5% and HS > 33% (areas under the curve (AUCs) = 0.737 and 0.926, respectively), followed by CTL/S (AUCs = 0.732 and 0.925, respectively) and CTL (AUCs = 0.707 and 0.880, respectively). For CT scans using 120 kVp, the CTL-S cut-off values for highly specific (i.e., - 2.1) and highly sensitive (i.e., 7.6) diagnosis of HS > 33% resulted in a specificity of 96.4% with a sensitivity of 64.0% and a sensitivity of 97.3% with a specificity of 54.9%, respectively, in the test cohort. CONCLUSION: CT indices using liver and spleen attenuations have higher performance for diagnosing HS than indices using liver attenuation alone. The CTL-S cut-off values in this study may have utility for diagnosing HS in clinical practice and research. KEY POINTS: • CT indices based on both liver attenuation and spleen attenuation (CTL-Sand CTL/S) have higher diagnostic performance than CTLbased on liver attenuation alone in diagnosing HS using various CT techniques. • The CT index cut-off values determined in this study can be utilized for reliable diagnosis or to rule out subjects with moderate to severe HS in clinical practice and research, including the selection of living liver donors and the development of cohorts with HS or healthy controls.
Authors: Yoshihisa Kodama; Chaan S Ng; Tsung T Wu; Gregory D Ayers; Steven A Curley; Eddie K Abdalla; Jean Nicolas Vauthey; Chusilp Charnsangavej Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2007-05 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: Tram T Tran; Chanikarn Changsri; C R Shackleton; Fred F Poordad; Nicholas N Nissen; Steven Colquhoun; Stephen A Geller; John M Vierling; Paul Martin Journal: J Gastroenterol Hepatol Date: 2006-02 Impact factor: 4.029
Authors: David E Kleiner; Elizabeth M Brunt; Mark Van Natta; Cynthia Behling; Melissa J Contos; Oscar W Cummings; Linda D Ferrell; Yao-Chang Liu; Michael S Torbenson; Aynur Unalp-Arida; Matthew Yeh; Arthur J McCullough; Arun J Sanyal Journal: Hepatology Date: 2005-06 Impact factor: 17.425
Authors: Piyaporn Limanond; Steven S Raman; Charles Lassman; James Sayre; R Mark Ghobrial; Ronald W Busuttil; Sammy Saab; David S K Lu Journal: Radiology Date: 2004-01 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Yura Ahn; Sung Cheol Yun; Seung Soo Lee; Jung Hee Son; Sora Jo; Jieun Byun; Yu Sub Sung; Ho Sung Kim; Eun Sil Yu Journal: Korean J Radiol Date: 2020-04 Impact factor: 3.500
Authors: Julius Henning Niehoff; Matthias Michael Woeltjen; Kai Roman Laukamp; Jan Borggrefe; Jan Robert Kroeger Journal: Diagnostics (Basel) Date: 2021-12-16