Literature DB >> 22772768

Frozen section diagnosis in donor liver biopsies: observer variation of semiquantitative and quantitative steatosis assessment.

Stefan Biesterfeld1, Jasmin Knapp, Fernando Bittinger, Heiko Götte, Martin Schramm, Gerd Otto.   

Abstract

Donor livers are not generally accepted for liver transplantation if intraoperative frozen section histology on wedge biopsies provides evidence for more severe steatosis. In this reliability study, assessment of steatosis in donor liver biopsies by different approaches (frozen sections vs. paraffin sections; macrovesicular steatosis vs. microvesicular steatosis), different observers, and different evaluation methods (conventional microscopy vs. point grid analysis on digital microphotographs) was compared. One hundred twenty consecutive donor liver biopsies were investigated. Intraoperative diagnosis was made on hematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-stained frozen sections. The residual portion of each biopsy was analyzed later on H&E-, diastase-resistant PAS-, and Elastica van Gieson-stained paraffin sections. Microvesicular steatosis and macrovesicular steatosis were classified semiquantitatively into 5 % steps. Additionally, point grid counting was applied on ten digital microphotographs per slide. The values for steatosis revealed a wide range of data between 0 and 70 or 85 % (mean values, 12.0-18.3 %), considering all types of specimens. The results of the two observers were highly correlated for macrovesicular steatosis (r ≥ 0.925) and for microvesicular steatosis (r ≥ 0.880). The values for macrovesicular and microvesicular steatosis, however, showed poor correlation (r ≤ 0.581). The rate of agreement between the two observers ranged between 84.2 and 95.8 % (κ, 0.763-0.937), depending on the threshold setting. For point grid analysis, significantly lower mean values and ranges for both types of steatosis compared to conventional histopathology were found (p < 0.001). Comparing the results of point grid analysis with those of conventional histopathology, a relatively loose correlation was found (r, 0.581-0.779). Intraoperative histology remains a reliable and highly relevant method for the assessment of steatosis in liver donor grafts. It represents one important component in the decision-finding whether or not a donor liver should be accepted and should possibly be combined with results of preoperative computed tomography imaging. Considering our data, macrovesicular and microvesicular steatosis should be analyzed separately due to the limited correlation between them.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22772768     DOI: 10.1007/s00428-012-1271-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Virchows Arch        ISSN: 0945-6317            Impact factor:   4.064


  49 in total

Review 1.  An approach to the rational use of steatotic donor livers in liver transplantation.

Authors:  M A Urena; E Moreno Gonzalez; C J Romero; F C Ruiz-Delgado; C Moreno Sanz
Journal:  Hepatogastroenterology       Date:  1999 Mar-Apr

2.  Focal fatty infiltration of the liver: analysis of prevalence and CT findings in children and young adults.

Authors:  B F Kammen; P Pacharn; R F Thoeni; Y Lu; A Qayyum; F Coakly; C A Gooding; R C Brasch
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 3.959

3.  The role of hepatic biopsy to detect macrovacuolar steatosis during liver procurement.

Authors:  G L Adani; U Baccarani; M Sainz-Barriga; D Lorenzin; V Bresadola; A Risaliti; C Avellini; G Trevisan; A De Candia; F Bresadola
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 1.066

Review 4.  Selecting the donor liver: risk factors for poor function after orthotopic liver transplantation.

Authors:  S M Strasberg; T K Howard; E P Molmenti; M Hertl
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 17.425

5.  Risk factors for primary dysfunction after liver transplantation--a multivariate analysis.

Authors:  R J Ploeg; A M D'Alessandro; S J Knechtle; M D Stegall; J D Pirsch; R M Hoffmann; T Sasaki; H W Sollinger; F O Belzer; M Kalayoglu
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 4.939

6.  Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: assessment of variability in pathologic interpretations.

Authors:  Z M Younossi; T Gramlich; Y C Liu; C Matteoni; M Petrelli; J Goldblum; L Rybicki; A J McCullough
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 7.842

7.  Observer variation in assessment of liver biopsies including analysis by kappa statistics.

Authors:  A Theodossi; A M Skene; B Portmann; R P Knill-Jones; R S Patrick; R A Tate; W Kealey; K J Jarvis; D J O'Brian; R Williams
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1980-08       Impact factor: 22.682

8.  Hepatic steatosis is a risk factor for postoperative complications after major hepatectomy: a matched case-control study.

Authors:  Lucas McCormack; Henrik Petrowsky; Wolfram Jochum; Katarzyna Furrer; Pierre-Alain Clavien
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Quantification of degree of steatosis in extended criteria donor grafts with standardized histologic techniques: implications for graft survival.

Authors:  F Frongillo; A W Avolio; E Nure; A Mulè; G Pepe; S C Magalini; S Agnes
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 1.066

10.  The accuracy of the report of hepatic steatosis on ultrasonography in patients infected with hepatitis C in a clinical setting: a retrospective observational study.

Authors:  Matthew J Hepburn; Jeffrey A Vos; Eric P Fillman; Eric J Lawitz
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2005-04-13       Impact factor: 3.067

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  [Donor liver histology : Joint recommendations of the DGP, DTG and DSO].

Authors:  C Schleicher; H-H Kreipe; P Schemmer; C P Strassburg; C-L Fischer-Fröhlich; A Rahmel; C Flechtenmacher
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 2.  The Landscape of Digital Pathology in Transplantation: From the Beginning to the Virtual E-Slide.

Authors:  Ilaria Girolami; Anil Parwani; Valeria Barresi; Stefano Marletta; Serena Ammendola; Lavinia Stefanizzi; Luca Novelli; Arrigo Capitanio; Matteo Brunelli; Liron Pantanowitz; Albino Eccher
Journal:  J Pathol Inform       Date:  2019-07-01

3.  Lipidomic-based investigation into the regulatory effect of Schisandrin B on palmitic acid level in non-alcoholic steatotic livers.

Authors:  Hiu Yee Kwan; Xuyan Niu; Wenlin Dai; Tiejun Tong; Xiaojuan Chao; Tao Su; Chi Leung Chan; Kim Chung Lee; Xiuqiong Fu; Hua Yi; Hua Yu; Ting Li; Anfernee Kai Wing Tse; Wang Fun Fong; Si-Yuan Pan; Aiping Lu; Zhi-Ling Yu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-03-13       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Deep learning quantification of percent steatosis in donor liver biopsy frozen sections.

Authors:  Lulu Sun; Jon N Marsh; Matthew K Matlock; Ling Chen; Joseph P Gaut; Elizabeth M Brunt; S Joshua Swamidass; Ta-Chiang Liu
Journal:  EBioMedicine       Date:  2020-09-24       Impact factor: 8.143

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.