Literature DB >> 15598449

Effect of segmentation errors on 3D-to-2D registration of implant models in X-ray images.

Mohamed R Mahfouz1, William A Hoff, Richard D Komistek, Douglas A Dennis.   

Abstract

In many biomedical applications, it is desirable to estimate the three-dimensional (3D) position and orientation (pose) of a metallic rigid object (such as a knee or hip implant) from its projection in a two-dimensional (2D) X-ray image. If the geometry of the object is known, as well as the details of the image formation process, then the pose of the object with respect to the sensor can be determined. A common method for 3D-to-2D registration is to first segment the silhouette contour from the X-ray image; that is, identify all points in the image that belong to the 2D silhouette and not to the background. This segmentation step is then followed by a search for the 3D pose that will best match the observed contour with a predicted contour. Although the silhouette of a metallic object is often clearly visible in an X-ray image, adjacent tissue and occlusions can make the exact location of the silhouette contour difficult to determine in places. Occlusion can occur when another object (such as another implant component) partially blocks the view of the object of interest. In this paper, we argue that common methods for segmentation can produce errors in the location of the 2D contour, and hence errors in the resulting 3D estimate of the pose. We show, on a typical fluoroscopy image of a knee implant component, that interactive and automatic methods for segmentation result in segmented contours that vary significantly. We show how the variability in the 2D contours (quantified by two different metrics) corresponds to variability in the 3D poses. Finally, we illustrate how traditional segmentation methods can fail completely in the (not uncommon) cases of images with occlusion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15598449     DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2004.02.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  9 in total

1.  Prosthetic component segmentation with blur compensation: a fast method for 3D fluoroscopy.

Authors:  Giacomo Tarroni; Luca Tersi; Cristiana Corsi; Rita Stagni
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2012-03-27       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  Measurement of an intact knee kinematics using gait and fluoroscopic analysis.

Authors:  Amir Hossein Saveh; Hamid Reza Katouzian; Mahmoud Chizari
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2010-06-19       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  A 3D kinematic estimation of knee prosthesis using X-ray projection images: clinical assessment of the improved algorithm for fluoroscopy images.

Authors:  Shunji Hirokawa; M Abrar Hossain; Yuichi Kihara; Shogo Ariyoshi
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2008-09-30       Impact factor: 2.602

4.  Accuracy of model-based RSA contour reduction in a typical clinical application.

Authors:  Christof Hurschler; Frank Seehaus; Judith Emmerich; Bart L Kaptein; Henning Windhagen
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-05-29       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Predicting 3D pose in partially overlapped X-ray images of knee prostheses using model-based Roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis (RSA).

Authors:  Chi-Pin Hsu; Shang-Chih Lin; Kao-Shang Shih; Chang-Hung Huang; Chian-Her Lee
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2014-10-08       Impact factor: 2.602

6.  Tibiofemoral kinematic analysis of knee flexion for a medial pivot knee.

Authors:  Pradeep Moonot; S Mu; G T Railton; R E Field; S A Banks
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2009-03-31       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Registration of 2D C-Arm and 3D CT Images for a C-Arm Image-Assisted Navigation System for Spinal Surgery.

Authors:  Chih-Ju Chang; Geng-Li Lin; Alex Tse; Hong-Yu Chu; Ching-Shiow Tseng
Journal:  Appl Bionics Biomech       Date:  2015-05-28       Impact factor: 1.781

8.  Intensity-Based Nonoverlapping Area Registration Supporting "Drop-Outs" in Terms of Model-Based Radiostereometric Analysis.

Authors:  Ondrej Klima; Petr Novobilsky; Roman Madeja; David Barina; Adam Chromy; Michal Spanel; Pavel Zemcik
Journal:  J Healthc Eng       Date:  2018-05-03       Impact factor: 2.682

9.  Dependence of model-based RSA accuracy on higher and lower implant surface model quality.

Authors:  Frank Seehaus; Judith Emmerich; Bart L Kaptein; Henning Windhagen; Christof Hurschler
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2013-04-16       Impact factor: 2.819

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.