Literature DB >> 15595894

Using visual noise to characterize amblyopic letter identification.

Denis G Pelli1, Dennis M Levi, Susana T L Chung.   

Abstract

Amblyopia is a much-studied but poorly understood developmental visual disorder that reduces acuity, profoundly reducing contrast sensitivity for small targets. Here we use visual noise to probe the letter identification process and characterize its impairment by amblyopia. We apply five levels of analysis - threshold, threshold in noise, equivalent noise, optical MTF, and noise modeling - to obtain a two-factor model of the amblyopic deficit: substantially reduced efficiency for small letters and negligibly increased cortical noise. Cortical noise, expressed as an equivalent input noise, varies among amblyopes but is roughly 1.4x normal, as though only 1/1.4 the normal number of cortical spikes are devoted to the amblyopic eye. This raises threshold contrast for large letters by a factor of radical1.4 = 1.2x, a negligible effect. All 16 amblyopic observers showed near-normal efficiency for large letters (> 4x acuity) and greatly reduced efficiency for small letters: 1/4 normal at 2x acuity and approaching 1/16 normal at acuity. Finding that the acuity loss represents a loss of efficiency rules out all models of amblyopia except those that predict the same sensitivity loss on blank and noisy backgrounds. One such model is the last-channel hypothesis, which supposes that the highest-spatial-frequency channels are missing, leaving the remaining highest-frequency channel struggling to identify the smallest letters. However, this hypothesis is rejected by critical band masking of letter identification, which shows that the channels used by the amblyopic eye have normal tuning for even the smallest letters. Finally, based on these results, we introduce a new "Dual Acuity" chart that promises to be a quick diagnostic test for amblyopia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15595894      PMCID: PMC2751822          DOI: 10.1167/4.10.6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  32 in total

1.  Why use noise?

Authors:  D G Pelli; B Farell
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 2.129

2.  Contour interaction in amblyopia: scale selection.

Authors:  R F Hess; S C Dakin; M Tewfik; B Brown
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Spatial-frequency properties of letter identification in amblyopia.

Authors:  Susana T L Chung; Dennis M Levi; Gordon E Legge; Bosco S Tjan
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  The Psychophysics Toolbox.

Authors:  D H Brainard
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

5.  The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies.

Authors:  D G Pelli
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

6.  The role of spatial frequency channels in letter identification.

Authors:  Najib J Majaj; Denis G Pelli; Peri Kurshan; Melanie Palomares
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Peripheral and central factors limiting the development of contrast sensitivity in macaque monkeys.

Authors:  L Kiorpes; J A Movshon
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Neural noise limitations on infant visual sensitivity.

Authors:  A M Skoczenski; A M Norcia
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1998-02-12       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Blur sensitivity in myopes.

Authors:  M Rosenfield; J A Abraham-Cohen
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 1.973

10.  Neuronal correlates of amblyopia in the visual cortex of macaque monkeys with experimental strabismus and anisometropia.

Authors:  L Kiorpes; D C Kiper; L P O'Keefe; J R Cavanaugh; J A Movshon
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1998-08-15       Impact factor: 6.167

View more
  31 in total

1.  Visual recovery in cortical blindness is limited by high internal noise.

Authors:  Matthew R Cavanaugh; Ruyuan Zhang; Michael D Melnick; Anasuya Das; Mariel Roberts; Duje Tadin; Marisa Carrasco; Krystel R Huxlin
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Individual Letter Contrast Thresholds: Effect of Object Frequency and Noise.

Authors:  Cierra Hall; Shu Wang; J Jason McAnany
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 1.973

Review 3.  Linking assumptions in amblyopia.

Authors:  Dennis M Levi
Journal:  Vis Neurosci       Date:  2013-07-24       Impact factor: 3.241

4.  Local motion processing limits fine direction discrimination in the periphery.

Authors:  Isabelle Mareschal; Peter J Bex; Steven C Dakin
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2008-06-16       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Mouse models of X-linked juvenile retinoschisis have an early onset phenotype, the severity of which varies with genotype.

Authors:  Yang Liu; Junzo Kinoshita; Elena Ivanova; Duo Sun; Hong Li; Tara Liao; Jingtai Cao; Brent A Bell; Jacob M Wang; Yajun Tang; Susannah Brydges; Neal S Peachey; Botir T Sagdullaev; Carmelo Romano
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2019-09-15       Impact factor: 6.150

6.  Action video game play facilitates the development of better perceptual templates.

Authors:  Vikranth R Bejjanki; Ruyuan Zhang; Renjie Li; Alexandre Pouget; C Shawn Green; Zhong-Lin Lu; Daphne Bavelier
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-11-10       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Reduced Contrast Sensitivity is Associated With Elevated Equivalent Intrinsic Noise in Type 2 Diabetics Who Have Mild or No Retinopathy.

Authors:  J Jason McAnany; Jason C Park
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2018-05-01       Impact factor: 4.799

8.  Mechanisms underlying perceptual learning of contrast detection in adults with anisometropic amblyopia.

Authors:  Chang-Bing Huang; Zhong-Lin Lu; Yifeng Zhou
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2009-10-27       Impact factor: 2.240

9.  Characterising the orientation-specific pattern-onset visual evoked potentials in children with bilateral refractive amblyopia and non-amblyopic controls.

Authors:  Tiong Peng Yap; Chi D Luu; Catherine M Suttle; Audrey Chia; Mei Ying Boon
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-09-23       Impact factor: 2.379

10.  The response of the amblyopic visual system to noise.

Authors:  Dennis M Levi; Stanley A Klein; Inning Chen
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2007-08-13       Impact factor: 1.886

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.