Literature DB >> 11448720

Contour interaction in amblyopia: scale selection.

R F Hess1, S C Dakin, M Tewfik, B Brown.   

Abstract

It has been known for some time that visual acuity in amblyopia is higher for single letters than for letters in a row (termed crowding). Early work showed that this could not be accounted for on the basis of the destructive interaction of adjacent contours (termed contour interaction), which was shown to be, in resolution units, normal in amblyopia. We have re-examined this issue using a letter stimulus that is modulated about a mean light level. This allows an examination of the effects of contrast polarity and spatial filtering within the contour interaction paradigm. We show that the majority of strabismic amblyopes that we investigated exhibit an anomalous contour interaction that, in some cases, was dependent on the contrast polarity of the flanking stimuli. Furthermore, we show that while amblyopes do select the optimum scale of analysis for unflanked stimuli, they do not select the optimum scale of analysis for flanked stimuli. For reasons that may have to do with their poorer shape discrimination, they select a non-optimal scale to process flanked stimuli.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11448720     DOI: 10.1016/s0042-6989(01)00099-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  10 in total

1.  Using visual noise to characterize amblyopic letter identification.

Authors:  Denis G Pelli; Dennis M Levi; Susana T L Chung
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2004-10-29       Impact factor: 2.240

Review 2.  Amblyopia: a mini review of the literature.

Authors:  Evgenia Kanonidou
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-03-20       Impact factor: 2.031

3.  Foveal contour interactions and crowding effects at the resolution limit of the visual system.

Authors:  Marina V Danilova; Valeria M Bondarko
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2007-11-27       Impact factor: 2.240

Review 4.  Crowding--an essential bottleneck for object recognition: a mini-review.

Authors:  Dennis M Levi
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2008-01-28       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Crowding between first- and second-order letters in amblyopia.

Authors:  Susana T L Chung; Roger W Li; Dennis M Levi
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2008-01-31       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Learning to identify near-acuity letters, either with or without flankers, results in improved letter size and spacing limits in adults with amblyopia.

Authors:  Susana T L Chung; Roger W Li; Dennis M Levi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-04-30       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Crowding changes appearance systematically in peripheral, amblyopic, and developing vision.

Authors:  Alexandra V Kalpadakis-Smith; Vijay K Tailor; Annegret H Dahlmann-Noor; John A Greenwood
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2022-05-03       Impact factor: 2.004

8.  Measuring the impact of suppression on visual acuity in children with amblyopia using a dichoptic visual acuity chart.

Authors:  Bixia Zhu; Meng Liao; Longqian Liu
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-07-15       Impact factor: 5.152

9.  Prolonged perceptual learning of positional acuity in adult amblyopia: perceptual template retuning dynamics.

Authors:  Roger W Li; Stanley A Klein; Dennis M Levi
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-12-24       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Temporal Characteristics of Visual Processing in Amblyopia.

Authors:  Xia Hu; Yi Qin; Xiaoxiao Ying; Junli Yuan; Rong Cui; Xiaowei Ruan; Xianghang He; Zhong-Lin Lu; Fan Lu; Fang Hou
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2021-06-03       Impact factor: 4.677

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.