Literature DB >> 17697689

The response of the amblyopic visual system to noise.

Dennis M Levi1, Stanley A Klein, Inning Chen.   

Abstract

Visual perception is limited by both the strength of the neural signals, and by the noise in the visual nervous system. Here we use one-dimensional white noise as input, to study the response of amblyopic visual system. We measured the thresholds for detection and discrimination of noise contrast. Using an N-pass reverse correlation technique, we derived classification images and estimated response consistency. Our results provide the first report of the sensitivity of the amblyopic visual system to white noise. We show that amblyopes have markedly reduced sensitivity for detecting noise, particularly at high spatial frequencies, and much less loss for discriminating suprathreshold noise contrast. Compensating for the detection loss almost (but not quite) equates performance of the amblyopic and normal visual system. The classification images suggest that the amblyopic visual system contains adjustable channels for noise, similar to those found in normal vision, but "tuned" to slightly lower spatial frequencies than in normal observers. Our N-pass results show that the predominant factor limiting performance in our task in both normal and amblyopic vision is internal random multiplicative noise. For the detection of white noise the raised thresholds of the amblyopic visual system can be attributed primarily to extra additive noise. However, for the discrimination of suprathreshold white noise contrast, there is surprisingly little additional deficit, after accounting for the visibility of the noise.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17697689      PMCID: PMC2099256          DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2007.06.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  33 in total

1.  Contrast sensitivity in amblyopia: masking effects of noise.

Authors:  J P Nordmann; R D Freeman; C Casanova
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 4.799

2.  Impairment of contrast discrimination in amblyopic eyes.

Authors:  K J Ciuffreda; S K Fisher
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  A comparison of contrast detection and discrimination.

Authors:  A Bradley; I Ohzawa
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Spatial information and uncertainty in anisometropic amblyopia.

Authors:  R J Watt; R F Hess
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Visual signal detection. IV. Observer inconsistency.

Authors:  A E Burgess; B Colborne
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 2.129

6.  Spatial frequency channels in human vision as asymmetric (edge) mechanisms.

Authors:  C F Stromeyer; S Klein
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1974-12       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Discrimination of position and contrast in amblyopic and peripheral vision.

Authors:  D M Levi; S A Klein; H Wang
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Contrast detection and detection of contrast modulation for noise gratings.

Authors:  J H Jamar; J J Koenderink
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  A power law for contrast discrimination.

Authors:  G E Legge
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  Statistical efficiency for the detection of visual noise.

Authors:  D Kersten
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 1.886

View more
  12 in total

1.  Psychophysical reverse correlation with multiple response alternatives.

Authors:  Huanping Dai; Christophe Micheyl
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 2.  Linking assumptions in amblyopia.

Authors:  Dennis M Levi
Journal:  Vis Neurosci       Date:  2013-07-24       Impact factor: 3.241

3.  Effects of anisometropic amblyopia on visuomotor behavior, I: saccadic eye movements.

Authors:  Ewa Niechwiej-Szwedo; Herbert C Goltz; Manokaraananthan Chandrakumar; Zahra A Hirji; Agnes M F Wong
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2010-07-29       Impact factor: 4.799

4.  Effects of anisometropic amblyopia on visuomotor behavior, part 2: visually guided reaching.

Authors:  Ewa Niechwiej-Szwedo; Herbert C Goltz; Manokaraananthan Chandrakumar; Zahra Hirji; J Douglas Crawford; Agnes M F Wong
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2011-02-09       Impact factor: 4.799

5.  Both saccadic and manual responses in the amblyopic eye of strabismics are irreducibly delayed.

Authors:  Christina Gambacorta; Jian Ding; Suzanne P McKee; Dennis M Levi
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Stochastic model for detection of signals in noise.

Authors:  Stanley A Klein; Dennis M Levi
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 2.129

7.  Noise and the Perceptual Filling-in effect.

Authors:  Ativ Zomet; Uri Polat; Dennis M Levi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-04-22       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Learning to identify near-threshold luminance-defined and contrast-defined letters in observers with amblyopia.

Authors:  Susana T L Chung; Roger W Li; Dennis M Levi
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2008-10-18       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Perceptual Visual Distortions in Adult Amblyopia and Their Relationship to Clinical Features.

Authors:  Marianne E F Piano; Peter J Bex; Anita J Simmers
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 4.799

10.  Developmental mechanisms underlying improved contrast thresholds for discriminations of orientation signals embedded in noise.

Authors:  Seong Taek Jeon; Daphne Maurer; Terri L Lewis
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-09-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.