Literature DB >> 10375246

Blur sensitivity in myopes.

M Rosenfield1, J A Abraham-Cohen.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study compared the ability of myopes and emmetropes to detect subjectively the presence of retinal defocus.
METHODS: Subjects (12 myopes, 12 emmetropes) were cyclopleged and monocularly viewed a bipartite target through an appropriate near addition lens via a 2-mm artificial pupil. One-half of the target remained fixed while the other half was alternatively moved forward or backward until subjects first reported a difference in clarity between the two halves of the target.
RESULTS: The mean blur threshold for the emmetropes and myopes was +/-0.11 and +/-0.19 D, respectively (p = 0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate that myopes are less sensitive to the presence of blur, and may at least partially explain why previous reports have demonstrated a larger lag of accommodation in this refractive group. Additionally, the hyperopic retinal defocus resulting from the increased accommodative error may play a significant role in myopia development and progression.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10375246     DOI: 10.1097/00006324-199905000-00018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Optom Vis Sci        ISSN: 1040-5488            Impact factor:   1.973


  22 in total

1.  Paraxial analysis of the depth of field of a pseudophakic eye with accommodating intraocular lens.

Authors:  Jit B Ale; Fabrice Manns; Arthur Ho
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 1.973

2.  Using visual noise to characterize amblyopic letter identification.

Authors:  Denis G Pelli; Dennis M Levi; Susana T L Chung
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2004-10-29       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Characteristics of accommodative behavior during sustained reading in emmetropes and myopes.

Authors:  Elise Harb; Frank Thorn; David Troilo
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2006-03-20       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Minus-lens-stimulated accommodative amplitude decreases sigmoidally with age: a study of objectively measured accommodative amplitudes from age 3.

Authors:  Heather A Anderson; Gloria Hentz; Adrian Glasser; Karla K Stuebing; Ruth E Manny
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2008-03-07       Impact factor: 4.799

5.  Retinal image quality during accommodation in adult myopic eyes.

Authors:  Vidhyapriya Sreenivasan; Emily Aslakson; Andrew Kornaus; Larry N Thibos
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 1.973

6.  Neural adaptation to peripheral blur in myopes and emmetropes.

Authors:  Atanu Ghosh; Len Zheleznyak; Antoine Barbot; HaeWon Jung; Geunyoung Yoon
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2016-12-18       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Blur Adaptation to Central Retinal Disease.

Authors:  Fuensanta A Vera-Diaz; Russell L Woods; Eli Peli
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 4.799

8.  Accommodation and induced myopia in marmosets.

Authors:  David Troilo; Nicole Quinn; Kayla Baker
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2007-03-13       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Vergence driven accommodation with simulated disparity in myopia and emmetropia.

Authors:  Guido Maiello; Kristen L Kerber; Frank Thorn; Peter J Bex; Fuensanta A Vera-Diaz
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  2017-10-16       Impact factor: 3.467

10.  The Effects of Spatial Frequency on the Accommodative Responses of Myopic and Emmetropic Chinese Children.

Authors:  Jingjing Xu; Xin Lu; Zhili Zheng; Jinhua Bao; Nisha Singh; Björn Drobe; Hao Chen
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2019-06-28       Impact factor: 3.283

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.