Literature DB >> 15574800

Motion mechanisms in macaque MT.

Bart Krekelberg1, Thomas D Albright.   

Abstract

The macaque middle temporal area (MT) is exquisitely sensitive to visual motion and there is a large amount of evidence that neural activity in MT is tightly correlated with the perception of motion. The mechanisms by which MT neurons achieve their directional selectivity, however, have received considerably less attention. We investigated the motion-energy model as a description of motion mechanisms in macaque MT. We first confirmed one of the predictions of the motion-energy model; macaques-just like humans-perceive a reversed direction of motion when a stimulus reverses contrast with every displacement (reverse-phi). This reversal of perceived direction had a clear correlate in the neural responses of MT cells, which were predictive of the monkey's behavioral decisions. Second, we investigated how multiple motion-energy components are combined. Psychophysical data have been used to argue that motion-energy components representing opposite directions are subtracted from each other. Our data show, however, that the interactions among motion-energy components are more complex. In particular, we found that the influence of a given component on the response to a stimulus consisting of multiple components depends on factors other than the response to that component alone. This suggests that there are subthreshold nonlinear interactions among multiple motion-energy components; these could take place within MT or in earlier stages of the motion network such as V1. We propose a model that captures the complexity of these component interactions by means of a competitive interaction among the components. This provides a better description of the MT responses than the subtractive motion opponency envisaged in the motion-energy model, even when the latter is combined with a gain-control mechanism. The competitive interaction extends the dynamic range of the cells and allows them to provide information on more subtle changes in motion patterns, including changes that are not purely directional.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15574800     DOI: 10.1152/jn.00473.2004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  29 in total

1.  Illusory motion perception in blindsight.

Authors:  Paul Azzopardi; Howard S Hock
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-12-27       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Evidence and Counterevidence in Motion Perception.

Authors:  Jacob Duijnhouwer; Bart Krekelberg
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2015-10-03       Impact factor: 5.357

3.  Interactions between speed and contrast tuning in the middle temporal area: implications for the neural code for speed.

Authors:  Bart Krekelberg; Richard J A van Wezel; Thomas D Albright
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-08-30       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Adaptive surround modulation in cortical area MT.

Authors:  Xin Huang; Thomas D Albright; Gene R Stoner
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2007-03-01       Impact factor: 17.173

5.  Stimulus dependency and mechanisms of surround modulation in cortical area MT.

Authors:  Xin Huang; Thomas D Albright; Gene R Stoner
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-12-17       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Similar adaptation effects in primary visual cortex and area MT of the macaque monkey under matched stimulus conditions.

Authors:  Carlyn A Patterson; Jacob Duijnhouwer; Stephanie C Wissig; Bart Krekelberg; Adam Kohn
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-12-26       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Neural mechanisms of speed perception: transparent motion.

Authors:  Bart Krekelberg; Richard J A van Wezel
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-08-07       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Brain abscess in a rhesus macaque (Macaca mulatta) with a cephalic implant.

Authors:  Mathias Leblanc; Kristy Berry; Holly McCort; Jon D Reuter
Journal:  Comp Med       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 0.982

9.  Models for the extrapolation of target motion for manual interception.

Authors:  John F Soechting; John Z Juveli; Hrishikesh M Rao
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-07-01       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Static sound timing alters sensitivity to low-level visual motion.

Authors:  Hulusi Kafaligonul; Gene R Stoner
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2012-10-03       Impact factor: 2.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.