Literature DB >> 21187390

Illusory motion perception in blindsight.

Paul Azzopardi1, Howard S Hock.   

Abstract

Motion detection is typically spared in blindsight, which results from damage to the striate cortex (area V1) of the brain that is sufficient to eliminate conscious visual awareness and severely reduce sensitivity to luminance contrast, especially for high spatial and low temporal frequencies. Here we show that the discrimination of motion direction within cortically blind fields is not attributable to feature tracking (the detection of changes in position or shape), but is due instead to the detection of first-order motion energy (spatiotemporal changes in luminance). The key to this finding was a version of the line motion illusion entailing reverse-phi motion in which opposing motion directions are simultaneously cued by motion energy and changes in stimulus shape. In forced-choice tests, a blindsighted test subject selected the direction cued by shape change when the stimulus was presented in his intact field, but reliably selected the direction cued by motion energy when the same stimulus was presented in his blind field, where relevant position information was either inaccessible or invalid. Motion energy has been characterized as objectless, so reliance on motion energy detection is consistent with impaired access to shape information in blindsight. The dissociation of motion direction by visual field (cortically blind vs. intact) provides evidence that two pathways from the retina to MT/V5 (the cortical area specialized for motion perception) are functionally distinct: the retinogeniculate pathway through V1 is specialized for feature-based motion perception, whereas the retinocollicular pathway, which bypasses V1, is specialized for detecting motion energy.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21187390      PMCID: PMC3021061          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1005974108

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  38 in total

1.  Attention-based motion perception.

Authors:  P Cavanagh
Journal:  Science       Date:  1992-09-11       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  DISTURBANCES OF VISION BY CEREBRAL LESIONS.

Authors:  G Holmes
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1918-07       Impact factor: 4.638

3.  Shape processing area LO and illusory contours.

Authors:  Lee H de-Wit; Robert W Kentridge; A David Milner
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 1.490

4.  Blindsight and visual awareness.

Authors:  P Azzopardi; A Cowey
Journal:  Conscious Cogn       Date:  1998-09

5.  Afferent basis of visual response properties in area MT of the macaque. II. Effects of superior colliculus removal.

Authors:  H R Rodman; C G Gross; T D Albright
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Motion selectivity in macaque visual cortex. III. Psychophysics and physiology of apparent motion.

Authors:  W T Newsome; A Mikami; R H Wurtz
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Leter: Residual visual function after brain wounds involving the central visual pathways in man.

Authors:  E Poppel; R Held; D Frost
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1973-06-01       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Focal visual attention produces illusory temporal order and motion sensation.

Authors:  O Hikosaka; S Miyauchi; S Shimojo
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Conscious visual perception without V1.

Authors:  J L Barbur; J D Watson; R S Frackowiak; S Zeki
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 13.501

10.  Blindsight depends on the lateral geniculate nucleus.

Authors:  Michael C Schmid; Sylwia W Mrowka; Janita Turchi; Richard C Saunders; Melanie Wilke; Andrew J Peters; Frank Q Ye; David A Leopold
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-06-23       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  9 in total

1.  Psychophysical and neuroimaging responses to moving stimuli in a patient with the Riddoch phenomenon due to bilateral visual cortex lesions.

Authors:  Michael J Arcaro; Lore Thaler; Derek J Quinlan; Simona Monaco; Sarah Khan; Kenneth F Valyear; Rainer Goebel; Gordon N Dutton; Melvyn A Goodale; Sabine Kastner; Jody C Culham
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2018-05-09       Impact factor: 3.139

2.  Audiovisual associations alter the perception of low-level visual motion.

Authors:  Hulusi Kafaligonul; Can Oluk
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2015-03-31

Review 3.  Unconscious Imagination and the Mental Imagery Debate.

Authors:  Berit Brogaard; Dimitria Electra Gatzia
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-05-23

4.  The Primary Role of Flow Processing in the Identification of Scene-Relative Object Movement.

Authors:  Simon K Rushton; Diederick C Niehorster; Paul A Warren; Li Li
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-12-11       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Early Trajectory Prediction in Elite Athletes.

Authors:  Cullen B Owens; Casper de Boer; Giulia Gennari; Robin Broersen; Johan J Pel; Brian Miller; Wesley Clapp; Ysbrand D van der Werf; Chris I De Zeeuw
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 3.847

6.  Do fish perceive illusory motion?

Authors:  Simone Gori; Christian Agrillo; Marco Dadda; Angelo Bisazza
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2014-09-23       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Rapid Motion Adaptation Reveals the Temporal Dynamics of Spatiotemporal Correlation between ON and OFF Pathways.

Authors:  Can Oluk; Andrea Pavan; Hulusi Kafaligonul
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-09-26       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Does unconscious perception really exist? Continuing the ASSC20 debate.

Authors:  Megan A K Peters; Robert W Kentridge; Ian Phillips; Ned Block
Journal:  Neurosci Conscious       Date:  2017-09-06

9.  Pigeons integrate visual motion signals differently than humans.

Authors:  Yuya Hataji; Hika Kuroshima; Kazuo Fujita
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-09-16       Impact factor: 4.379

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.