| Literature DB >> 17329214 |
Xin Huang1, Thomas D Albright, Gene R Stoner.
Abstract
Visual motion perception relies on two opposing operations: integration and segmentation. Integration overcomes motion ambiguity in the visual image by spatial pooling of motion signals, whereas segmentation identifies differences between adjacent moving objects. For visual motion area MT, previous investigations have reported that stimuli in the receptive field surround, which do not elicit a response when presented alone, can nevertheless modulate responses to stimuli in the receptive field center. The directional tuning of this "surround modulation" has been found to be mainly antagonistic and hence consistent with segmentation. Here, we report that surround modulation in area MT can be either antagonistic or integrative depending upon the visual stimulus. Both types of modulation were delayed relative to response onset. Our results suggest that the dominance of antagonistic modulation in previous MT studies was due to stimulus choice and that segmentation and integration are achieved, in part, via adaptive surround modulation.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2007 PMID: 17329214 PMCID: PMC1866303 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2007.01.032
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Neuron ISSN: 0896-6273 Impact factor: 17.173