Literature DB >> 24371295

Similar adaptation effects in primary visual cortex and area MT of the macaque monkey under matched stimulus conditions.

Carlyn A Patterson1, Jacob Duijnhouwer, Stephanie C Wissig, Bart Krekelberg, Adam Kohn.   

Abstract

Recent stimulus history, or adaptation, can alter neuronal response properties. Adaptation effects have been characterized in a number of visually responsive structures, from the retina to higher visual cortex. However, it remains unclear whether adaptation effects across stages of the visual system take a similar form in response to a particular sensory event. This is because studies typically probe a single structure or cortical area, using a stimulus ensemble chosen to provide potent drive to the cells of interest. Here we adopt an alternative approach and compare adaptation effects in primary visual cortex (V1) and area MT using identical stimulus ensembles. Previous work has suggested these areas adjust to recent stimulus drive in distinct ways. We show that this is not the case: adaptation effects in V1 and MT can involve weak or strong loss of responsivity and shifts in neuronal preference toward or away from the adapter, depending on stimulus size and adaptation duration. For a particular stimulus size and adaptation duration, however, effects are similar in nature and magnitude in V1 and MT. We also show that adaptation effects in MT of awake animals depend strongly on stimulus size. Our results suggest that the strategies for adjusting to recent stimulus history depend more strongly on adaptation duration and stimulus size than on the cortical area. Moreover, they indicate that different levels of the visual system adapt similarly to recent sensory experience.

Entities:  

Keywords:  V1; adaptation duration; motion processing; plasticity; surround suppression

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24371295      PMCID: PMC3949312          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00030.2013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  56 in total

1.  Dynamic modification of cortical orientation tuning mediated by recurrent connections.

Authors:  Gidon Felsen; Yao-song Shen; Haishan Yao; Gareth Spor; Chaoyi Li; Yang Dan
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2002-12-05       Impact factor: 17.173

2.  The influence of surround suppression on adaptation effects in primary visual cortex.

Authors:  Stephanie C Wissig; Adam Kohn
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-03-14       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Relationship between contrast adaptation and orientation tuning in V1 and V2 of cat visual cortex.

Authors:  N A Crowder; N S C Price; M A Hietanen; B Dreher; C W G Clifford; M R Ibbotson
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2005-09-28       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 4.  Visual adaptation: physiology, mechanisms, and functional benefits.

Authors:  Adam Kohn
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-03-07       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Relationship between adapted neural population responses in MT and motion adaptation in speed and direction of smooth-pursuit eye movements.

Authors:  Jin Yang; Stephen G Lisberger
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-02-18       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Adaptable mechanisms that regulate the contrast response of neurons in the primate lateral geniculate nucleus.

Authors:  Aaron J Camp; Chris Tailby; Samuel G Solomon
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-04-15       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Temporal interactions in the cat visual system. II. Suppressive and facilitatory effects in the lateral geniculate nucleus.

Authors:  S B Nelson
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Recent history of stimulus speeds affects the speed tuning of neurons in area MT.

Authors:  Anja Schlack; Bart Krekelberg; Thomas D Albright
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-10-10       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Direction and orientation selectivity of neurons in visual area MT of the macaque.

Authors:  T D Albright
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1984-12       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  The complex structure of receptive fields in the middle temporal area.

Authors:  Micah Richert; Thomas D Albright; Bart Krekelberg
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2013-03-06
View more
  25 in total

1.  Adaptation-induced modification of motion selectivity tuning in visual tectal neurons of adult zebrafish.

Authors:  Vanessa Hollmann; Valerie Lucks; Rafael Kurtz; Jacob Engelmann
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-09-16       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Evidence and Counterevidence in Motion Perception.

Authors:  Jacob Duijnhouwer; Bart Krekelberg
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2015-10-03       Impact factor: 5.357

3.  Repetition suppression for visual actions in the macaque superior temporal sulcus.

Authors:  Pradeep Kuravi; Vittorio Caggiano; Martin Giese; Rufin Vogels
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-12-23       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  A Bayesian and efficient observer model explains concurrent attractive and repulsive history biases in visual perception.

Authors:  Matthias Fritsche; Eelke Spaak; Floris P de Lange
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 8.140

5.  V1 microcircuit dynamics: altered signal propagation suggests intracortical origins for adaptation in response to visual repetition.

Authors:  Jacob A Westerberg; Michele A Cox; Kacie Dougherty; Alexander Maier
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-03-27       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Temporal Contingencies Determine Whether Adaptation Strengthens or Weakens Normalization.

Authors:  Amir Aschner; Samuel G Solomon; Michael S Landy; David J Heeger; Adam Kohn
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-10-05       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Adaptation disrupts motion integration in the primate dorsal stream.

Authors:  Carlyn A Patterson; Stephanie C Wissig; Adam Kohn
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2014-02-05       Impact factor: 17.173

8.  Temporal tuning of repetition suppression across the visual cortex.

Authors:  Matthias Fritsche; Samuel J D Lawrence; Floris P de Lange
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-11-27       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Integration of motion energy from overlapping random background noise increases perceived speed of coherently moving stimuli.

Authors:  Jason Chuang; Emily C Ausloos; Courtney A Schwebach; Xin Huang
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-09-28       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Adaptation without Plasticity.

Authors:  Maria Del Mar Quiroga; Adam P Morris; Bart Krekelberg
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2016-09-27       Impact factor: 9.423

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.