Literature DB >> 15574099

Strength and conditioning practices of National Hockey League strength and conditioning coaches.

William P Ebben1, Ryan M Carroll, Christopher J Simenz.   

Abstract

This study describes the results of a survey of the practices of National Hockey League strength and conditioning (NHL S&C) coaches. The response rate was 76.6% (23 of 30). This survey examines (a) background information, (b) physical testing, (c) flexibility development, (d) speed development, (e) plyometrics, (f) strength/power development, (g) unique aspects, and (h) comments. Results indicate, in part, that coaches assess an average of 7.2 parameters of fitness, with tests of strength and power being the most common. All coaches used a variety of flexibility-development strategies. Results reveal that 21 of 23 (91.3%) of NHL S&C coaches follow a periodization model (PM). Of the coaches who follow a PM, 21 of 21 (100%) indicated that their athletes used Olympic-style lifts, and 21 of 21 coaches (100%) trained athletes with plyometric exercises. For those who used plyometrics with their athletes, 17 of 21 (80.1%) reported no plyometric-related injuries in the past year. Coaches who report they did not follow a PM also did not use Olympic-style lifts, plyometrics, or speed development strategies, such as assisted, resisted, or interval training, with their athletes. Finally, coaches reported that the squat and their variations, as well at the Olympic-style lifts and its variations, were most frequently used with their athletes. The survey serves as a review, as well as a source of applied information and new ideas.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15574099     DOI: 10.1519/14133.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Strength Cond Res        ISSN: 1064-8011            Impact factor:   3.775


  26 in total

Review 1.  Power athletes and distance training: physiological and biomechanical rationale for change.

Authors:  Marcus C C W Elliott; Phillip P Wagner; Loren Chiu
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 2.  Professional practice in exercise science : the need for greater disciplinary balance.

Authors:  Jeffrey C Ives; Duane Knudson
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 3.  Does plyometric training improve vertical jump height? A meta-analytical review.

Authors:  Goran Markovic
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2007-03-08       Impact factor: 13.800

4.  Short Durations of Static Stretching when Combined with Dynamic Stretching do not Impair Repeated Sprints and Agility.

Authors:  Del P Wong; Anis Chaouachi; Patrick W C Lau; David G Behm
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2011-06-01       Impact factor: 2.988

5.  Using bench press load to predict upper body exercise loads in physically active individuals.

Authors:  Del P Wong; Kwan-Lung Ngo; Michael A Tse; Andrew W Smith
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2013-03-01       Impact factor: 2.988

Review 6.  Developing maximal neuromuscular power: part 2 - training considerations for improving maximal power production.

Authors:  Prue Cormie; Michael R McGuigan; Robert U Newton
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2011-02-01       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 7.  A review of the acute effects of static and dynamic stretching on performance.

Authors:  David G Behm; Anis Chaouachi
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2011-03-04       Impact factor: 3.078

8.  PERFORMANCE OPTIMIZATION AND INJURY PREVENTION STRATEGIES FOR THE ARMY PHYSICAL FITNESS TEST: TECHNIQUE MATTERS.

Authors:  Mark Thelen; Shane Koppenhaver
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2015-06

Review 9.  Neurophysiological Mechanisms Underpinning Stretch-Induced Force Loss.

Authors:  Gabriel S Trajano; Kazunori Nosaka; Anthony J Blazevich
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 11.136

10.  The effects of different durations of static stretching within a comprehensive warm-up on voluntary and evoked contractile properties.

Authors:  Jonathan C Reid; Rebecca Greene; James D Young; Daniel D Hodgson; Anthony J Blazevich; David G Behm
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2018-05-02       Impact factor: 3.078

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.