Literature DB >> 29721606

The effects of different durations of static stretching within a comprehensive warm-up on voluntary and evoked contractile properties.

Jonathan C Reid1, Rebecca Greene1, James D Young1, Daniel D Hodgson1, Anthony J Blazevich2, David G Behm3.   

Abstract

Evidence for performance decrements following prolonged static stretching (SS) has led to a paradigm shift in stretching routines within a warm-up. Rather than SS, dynamic stretching (DS) and dynamic activity (DA) have replaced SS within warm-up routines. The objective of the present study was to compare the effect of differing lower limb SS durations (30 [SS30s], 60 [SS60s] or 120 s [SS120s] of SS per muscle group or no-stretch control) within a comprehensive warm-up protocol consisting of aerobic activity, DS and DA. Sixteen male participants completed the four stretching conditions in a randomized order, after a 5-min low-intensity (cycle) warm-up and before a DS/DA component on separate days. Tests included passive hip and knee ranges of motion (ROM), maximum voluntary knee extensor/flexor force, force produced at 100 ms (F100), vertical jump height and evoked knee extensor contractile properties. For hip flexion (hamstrings) ROM, SS120s provided the largest increase (5.6-11.7%) followed by SS60s (4.3-11.4%), control (4.4-10.6%) and SS30s (3.6-11.1%). For knee flexion (quadriceps) ROM, SS30s provided the largest increase (9.3-18.2%) followed by SS120s (6.5-16.3%), SS60s (7.2-15.2%) and control (6.3-15.2%). There were decreases in quadriceps F100 following SS in SS120s (29.6%) only. There were increases in vertical jump performance in the control (6.2%), SS60s (4.6%) and SS30s (3.3%). While 120 s SS per muscle increased ROM, even within a comprehensive warm-up routine, it also elicited notable performance decrements. However, moderate durations of SS were observed to improve ROM whilst either having negligible or beneficial (but not detrimental) effects on specific aspects of athletic performance.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dynamic stretching; Force; Range of motion; Static stretching; Vertical jump

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29721606     DOI: 10.1007/s00421-018-3874-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol        ISSN: 1439-6319            Impact factor:   3.078


  73 in total

1.  Acute ballistic muscle stretching inhibits maximal strength performance.

Authors:  A G Nelson; J Kokkonen
Journal:  Res Q Exerc Sport       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 2.500

2.  Acute effects of different warm-up methods on sprint, slalom dribbling, and penalty kick performance in soccer players.

Authors:  Ertugrul Gelen
Journal:  J Strength Cond Res       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 3.775

3.  Static stretching impairs sprint performance in collegiate track and field athletes.

Authors:  Jason B Winchester; Arnold G Nelson; Dennis Landin; Michael A Young; Irving C Schexnayder
Journal:  J Strength Cond Res       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 3.775

4.  Negative effect of static stretching restored when combined with a sport specific warm-up component.

Authors:  Kristie-Lee Taylor; Jeremy M Sheppard; Hamilton Lee; Norma Plummer
Journal:  J Sci Med Sport       Date:  2008-09-03       Impact factor: 4.319

5.  The interpolated twitch technique may be valid and reliable but limited.

Authors:  David G Behm
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2009-07

6.  No Effect of Muscle Stretching within a Full, Dynamic Warm-up on Athletic Performance.

Authors:  Anthony J Blazevich; Nicholas D Gill; Thue Kvorning; Anthony D Kay; Alvin G Goh; Bradley Hilton; Eric J Drinkwater; David G Behm
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 5.411

7.  Influence of muscle temperature on maximal muscle strength and power output in human skeletal muscles.

Authors:  U Bergh; B Ekblom
Journal:  Acta Physiol Scand       Date:  1979-09

8.  Effects of static and dynamic stretching on sprint and jump performance in boys and girls.

Authors:  Giorgos P Paradisis; Panagiotis T Pappas; Apostolos S Theodorou; Elias G Zacharogiannis; Emmanouil K Skordilis; Athanasia S Smirniotou
Journal:  J Strength Cond Res       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 3.775

9.  The acute effect of stretching on the passive stiffness of the human gastrocnemius muscle tendon unit.

Authors:  C I Morse; H Degens; O R Seynnes; C N Maganaris; D A Jones
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2007-09-20       Impact factor: 5.182

10.  Effect of warm-ups involving static or dynamic stretching on agility, sprinting, and jumping performance in trained individuals.

Authors:  Anis Chaouachi; Carlo Castagna; Moktar Chtara; Matt Brughelli; Olfa Turki; Oliver Galy; Karim Chamari; David G Behm
Journal:  J Strength Cond Res       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 3.775

View more
  15 in total

1.  Dynamic Stretching Has Sustained Effects on Range of Motion and Passive Stiffness of the Hamstring Muscles.

Authors:  Masahiro Iwata; Ayano Yamamoto; Shingo Matsuo; Genki Hatano; Manabu Miyazaki; Taizan Fukaya; Mitsuhiro Fujiwara; Yuji Asai; Shigeyuki Suzuki
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2019-02-11       Impact factor: 2.988

2.  Non-local Acute Passive Stretching Effects on Range of Motion in Healthy Adults: A Systematic Review with Meta-analysis.

Authors:  David G Behm; Shahab Alizadeh; Saman Hadjizadeh Anvar; Ben Drury; Urs Granacher; Jason Moran
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2021-01-18       Impact factor: 11.136

3.  Sport-Specific Warm-Up Attenuates Static Stretching- Induced Negative Effects on Vertical Jump But Not Neuromuscular Excitability in Basketball Players.

Authors:  Vuk B Stevanovic; Milan B Jelic; Sladjan D Milanovic; Sasa R Filipovic; Mladen J Mikic; Marko D M Stojanovic
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2019-06-01       Impact factor: 2.988

4.  Effects of Dynamic Stretching with Different Loads on Hip Joint Range of Motion in the Elderly.

Authors:  Wen-Sheng Zhou; Jia-Huei Lin; Shu-Chen Chen; Kuei-Yu Chien
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2019-02-11       Impact factor: 2.988

5.  Myofascial Treatment Techniques on the Plantar Surface Influence Functional Performance in the Dorsal Kinetic Chain.

Authors:  Anna Gabriel; Andreas Konrad; Anna Roidl; Jennifer Queisser; Robert Schleip; Thomas Horstmann; Torsten Pohl
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2022-02-15       Impact factor: 2.988

6.  An Intense Warm-Up Does Not Potentiate Performance Before or After a Single Bout of Foam Rolling.

Authors:  Andreas Konrad; Daniel Bernsteiner; Marina Maren Reiner; Masatoshi Nakamura; Markus Tilp
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2022-06-01       Impact factor: 4.017

7.  The Time-Course Changes in Knee Flexion Range of Motion, Muscle Strength, and Rate of Force Development After Static Stretching.

Authors:  Masatoshi Nakamura; Yusuke Suzuki; Riku Yoshida; Kazuki Kasahara; Yuta Murakami; Tetsuya Hirono; Satoru Nishishita; Kosuke Takeuchi; Andreas Konrad
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2022-06-02       Impact factor: 4.755

8.  Acute effects of dynamic stretching on neuromechanical properties: an interaction between stretching, contraction, and movement.

Authors:  Denis César Leite Vieira; Jules Opplert; Nicolas Babault
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2021-01-08       Impact factor: 3.078

9.  The time course of muscle-tendon properties and function responses of a five-minute static stretching exercise.

Authors:  A Konrad; M M Reiner; S Thaller; M Tilp
Journal:  Eur J Sport Sci       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 4.050

10.  Dynamic stretching alone can impair slower velocity isokinetic performance of young male handball players for at least 24 hours.

Authors:  Monoem Haddad; Mohammad Shoaib Prince; Nidhal Zarrouk; Montassar Tabben; David G Behm; Karim Chamari
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-01-25       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.