Literature DB >> 21373870

A review of the acute effects of static and dynamic stretching on performance.

David G Behm1, Anis Chaouachi.   

Abstract

An objective of a warm-up prior to an athletic event is to optimize performance. Warm-ups are typically composed of a submaximal aerobic activity, stretching and a sport-specific activity. The stretching portion traditionally incorporated static stretching. However, there are a myriad of studies demonstrating static stretch-induced performance impairments. More recently, there are a substantial number of articles with no detrimental effects associated with prior static stretching. The lack of impairment may be related to a number of factors. These include static stretching that is of short duration (<90 s total) with a stretch intensity less than the point of discomfort. Other factors include the type of performance test measured and implemented on an elite athletic or trained middle aged population. Static stretching may actually provide benefits in some cases such as slower velocity eccentric contractions, and contractions of a more prolonged duration or stretch-shortening cycle. Dynamic stretching has been shown to either have no effect or may augment subsequent performance, especially if the duration of the dynamic stretching is prolonged. Static stretching used in a separate training session can provide health related range of motion benefits. Generally, a warm-up to minimize impairments and enhance performance should be composed of a submaximal intensity aerobic activity followed by large amplitude dynamic stretching and then completed with sport-specific dynamic activities. Sports that necessitate a high degree of static flexibility should use short duration static stretches with lower intensity stretches in a trained population to minimize the possibilities of impairments.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21373870     DOI: 10.1007/s00421-011-1879-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol        ISSN: 1439-6319            Impact factor:   3.078


  139 in total

1.  Acute effects of different warm-up methods on sprint, slalom dribbling, and penalty kick performance in soccer players.

Authors:  Ertugrul Gelen
Journal:  J Strength Cond Res       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 3.775

2.  Acute effects of different warm-up protocols on fitness performance in children.

Authors:  Avery D Faigenbaum; Mario Bellucci; Angelo Bernieri; Bart Bakker; Karlyn Hoorens
Journal:  J Strength Cond Res       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 3.775

3.  Acute effects of static stretching on maximal eccentric torque production in women.

Authors:  Joel T Cramer; Terry J Housh; Jared W Coburn; Travis W Beck; Glen O Johnson
Journal:  J Strength Cond Res       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 3.775

4.  Duration of stretch does not influence the degree of force loss following static stretching.

Authors:  J P Brandenburg
Journal:  J Sports Med Phys Fitness       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 1.637

5.  Effects of differing intensities of static stretching on jump performance.

Authors:  David G Behm; Armin Kibele
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2007-08-04       Impact factor: 3.078

6.  Effects of dynamic and static stretching on vertical jump performance and electromyographic activity.

Authors:  Paul A Hough; Emma Z Ross; Glyn Howatson
Journal:  J Strength Cond Res       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 3.775

7.  The relationship between stiffness of the musculature and static flexibility: an alternative explanation for the occurrence of muscular injury.

Authors:  G J Wilson; G A Wood; B C Elliott
Journal:  Int J Sports Med       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 3.118

8.  Acute effects of different stretching exercises on muscular endurance.

Authors:  Bruno L Franco; Gabriel R Signorelli; Gabriel S Trajano; Carlos G de Oliveira
Journal:  J Strength Cond Res       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 3.775

9.  Acute effect of static stretching on rate of force development and maximal voluntary contraction in older women.

Authors:  André L D Gurjão; Raquel Gonçalves; Rodrigo F de Moura; Sebastião Gobbi
Journal:  J Strength Cond Res       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 3.775

10.  Pre-exercise stretching does not impact upon running economy.

Authors:  Philip R Hayes; Adrian Walker
Journal:  J Strength Cond Res       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 3.775

View more
  112 in total

1.  Acute bouts of upper and lower body static and dynamic stretching increase non-local joint range of motion.

Authors:  David George Behm; Tyler Cavanaugh; Patrick Quigley; Jonathan Christopher Reid; Priscyla Silva Monteiro Nardi; Paulo Henrique Marchetti
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2015-09-26       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  Discrete quasi-linear viscoelastic damping analysis of connective tissues, and the biomechanics of stretching.

Authors:  Behzad Babaei; Aaron J Velasquez-Mao; Stavros Thomopoulos; Elliot L Elson; Steven D Abramowitch; Guy M Genin
Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater       Date:  2016-12-22

3.  Stretching versus transitory icing: which is the more effective treatment for attenuating muscle fatigue after repeated manual labor?

Authors:  Yasumasa Eguchi; Manabu Jinde; Kazuki Murooka; Yoshimasa Konno; Masanori Ohta; Hiroshi Yamato
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2014-08-26       Impact factor: 3.078

4.  Roller-massager application to the hamstrings increases sit-and-reach range of motion within five to ten seconds without performance impairments.

Authors:  Kathleen M Sullivan; Dustin B J Silvey; Duane C Button; David G Behm
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2013-06

5.  Short Durations of Static Stretching when Combined with Dynamic Stretching do not Impair Repeated Sprints and Agility.

Authors:  Del P Wong; Anis Chaouachi; Patrick W C Lau; David G Behm
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2011-06-01       Impact factor: 2.988

6.  Acute effects of three different stretching protocols on the wingate test performance.

Authors:  Bruno L Franco; Gabriel R Signorelli; Gabriel S Trajano; Pablo B Costa; Carlos G de Oliveira
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2012-03-01       Impact factor: 2.988

7.  Effects of dynamic and static stretching within general and activity specific warm-up protocols.

Authors:  Michael Samson; Duane C Button; Anis Chaouachi; David G Behm
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2012-06-01       Impact factor: 2.988

8.  Topical Analgesic Improved or Maintained Ballistic Hip Flexion Range of Motion with Treated and Untreated Legs.

Authors:  Arielle Whalen; Kaitlyn Farrell; Stephanie Roberts; Hannah Smith; David G Behm
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 2.988

9.  Unilateral plantar flexors static-stretching effects on ipsilateral and contralateral jump measures.

Authors:  Josinaldo Jarbas da Silva; David George Behm; Willy Andrade Gomes; Fernando Henrique Domingues de Oliveira Silva; Enrico Gori Soares; Érica Paes Serpa; Guanis de Barros Vilela Junior; Charles Ricardo Lopes; Paulo Henrique Marchetti
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2015-05-08       Impact factor: 2.988

10.  The effects of different durations of static stretching within a comprehensive warm-up on voluntary and evoked contractile properties.

Authors:  Jonathan C Reid; Rebecca Greene; James D Young; Daniel D Hodgson; Anthony J Blazevich; David G Behm
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2018-05-02       Impact factor: 3.078

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.