Literature DB >> 24149723

Using bench press load to predict upper body exercise loads in physically active individuals.

Del P Wong1, Kwan-Lung Ngo, Michael A Tse, Andrew W Smith.   

Abstract

This study investigated whether loads for assistance exercises of the upper body can be predicted from the loads of the bench press exercise. Twenty-nine physically active collegiate students (age: 22.6 ± 2.5; weight training experience: 2.9 ± 2.1 years; estimated 1RM bench press: 54.31 ± 14.60 kg; 1RM: body weight ratio: 0.80 ± 0.22; BMI: 22.7 ± 2.1 kg·m(-2)) were recruited. The 6RM loads for bench press, barbell bicep curl, overhead dumbbell triceps extension, hammer curl and dumbbell shoulder press were measured. Test-retest reliability for the 5 exercises as determined by Pearson product moment correlation coefficient was very high to nearly perfect (0.82-0.98, p < 0.01). The bench press load was significantly correlated with the loads of the 4 assistance exercises (r ranged from 0.80 to 0.93, p < 0.01). Linear regression revealed that the bench press load was a significant (R(2) range from 0.64 to 0.86, p < 0.01) predictor for the loads of the 4 assistance exercises. The following 6RM prediction equations were determined: (a) Hammer curl = Bench press load (0.28) + 6.30 kg, (b) Barbell biceps curl = Bench press load (0.33) + 6.20 kg, (c) Overhead triceps extension = Bench press load (0.33) - 0.60 kg, and (d) Dumbbell shoulder press = Bench press load (0.42) + 5.84 kg. The difference between the actual load and the predicted load using the four equations ranged between 6.52% and 8.54%, such difference was not significant. Fitness professionals can use the 6RM bench press load as a time effective and accurate method to predict training loads for upper body assistance exercises. Key pointsThe bench press load was significantly correlated with the loads of the 4 assistance exercises.No significant differences were found between the actual load and the predicted load in the four equations.6RM bench press load can be a time effective and accurate method to predict training loads for upper body assistance exercises.

Keywords:  Strength training; repetition maximum; resistance training; training load; weight

Year:  2013        PMID: 24149723      PMCID: PMC3761768     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sports Sci Med        ISSN: 1303-2968            Impact factor:   2.988


  22 in total

Review 1.  Bilateral and unilateral contractions: possible differences in maximal voluntary force.

Authors:  J M Jakobi; P D Chilibeck
Journal:  Can J Appl Physiol       Date:  2001-02

2.  Measures of reliability in sports medicine and science.

Authors:  W G Hopkins
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 11.136

3.  The effects of antagonist prefatigue on agonist torque and electromyography.

Authors:  Jeremy Maynard; William P Ebben
Journal:  J Strength Cond Res       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 3.775

4.  The effect of rest interval length on bench press performance with heavy vs. light loads.

Authors:  Jeffrey M Willardson; Lee N Burkett
Journal:  J Strength Cond Res       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 3.775

5.  Strength outcomes in fixed versus free-form resistance equipment.

Authors:  Keith C Spennewyn
Journal:  J Strength Cond Res       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 3.775

6.  Muscular outputs during dynamic bench press under stable versus unstable conditions.

Authors:  Sentaro Koshida; Yukio Urabe; Koji Miyashita; Kanzunori Iwai; Aya Kagimori
Journal:  J Strength Cond Res       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 3.775

7.  Muscle activations under varying lifting speeds and intensities during bench press.

Authors:  Akihiro Sakamoto; Peter James Sinclair
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2011-07-07       Impact factor: 3.078

8.  The influence of grip width and forearm pronation/supination on upper-body myoelectric activity during the flat bench press.

Authors:  Gregory J Lehman
Journal:  J Strength Cond Res       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 3.775

9.  Effects of resistance training and detraining on muscle strength and blood lipid profiles in postmenopausal women.

Authors:  K J Elliott; C Sale; N T Cable
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 13.800

10.  Using squat repetition maximum testing to determine hamstring resistance training exercise loads.

Authors:  William P Ebben; Nicholas J Long; Zach D Pawlowski; Lauren M Chmielewski; Rustin W Clewien; Randall L Jensen
Journal:  J Strength Cond Res       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 3.775

View more
  3 in total

1.  Association Between Maximal Bench Press Strength and Isometric Handgrip Strength Among Breast Cancer Survivors.

Authors:  Benjamin H Rogers; Justin C Brown; David R Gater; Kathryn H Schmitz
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2016-08-16       Impact factor: 3.966

2.  Physical profiling of international cricket players: an investigation between bowlers and batters.

Authors:  Anthony Weldon; Neil D Clarke; Lee Pote; Chris Bishop
Journal:  Biol Sport       Date:  2020-12-30       Impact factor: 4.606

3.  The Effects of Vision-Deprived Progressive Resistance Training on One-Repetition Maximum Bench Press Performance: An Exploratory Study.

Authors:  Ali Boolani; Masoud Moghaddam; Daniel Fuller; Sumona Mondal; Shantanu Sur; Rebecca Martin; Ahmed Kadry; Ahmed Ali Torad; Mostafa Ali Elwan; Rumit Singh Kakar
Journal:  Vision (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-02
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.