Literature DB >> 15564219

"Care and feeding": the Asian environmental tobacco smoke consultants programme.

M Assunta1, N Fields, J Knight, S Chapman.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: To review the tobacco industry's Asian environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) consultants programme, focusing on three key nations: China, Hong Kong, and Malaysia.
METHODS: Systematic keyword and opportunistic website searches of formerly private internal industry documents. MAIN
RESULTS: The release of the 1986 US Surgeon General's report on second hand smoke provoked tobacco companies to prepare for a major threat to their industry. Asian programme activities included conducting national/international symposiums, consultant "road shows" and extensive lobbying and media activities. The industry exploited confounding factors said to be unique to Asian societies such as diet, culture and urban pollution to downplay the health risks of ETS. The industry consultants were said to be "..prepared to do the kinds of things they were recruited to do".
CONCLUSIONS: The programme was successful in blurring the science on ETS and keeping the controversy alive both nationally and internationally. For the duration of the project, it also successfully dissuaded national policy makers from instituting comprehensive bans on smoking in public places.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15564219      PMCID: PMC1766156          DOI: 10.1136/tc.2003.005199

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tob Control        ISSN: 0964-4563            Impact factor:   7.552


  9 in total

Review 1.  Constructing "sound science" and "good epidemiology": tobacco, lawyers, and public relations firms.

Authors:  E K Ong; S A Glantz
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 2.  The smoke you don't see: uncovering tobacco industry scientific strategies aimed against environmental tobacco smoke policies.

Authors:  M E Muggli; J L Forster; R D Hurt; J L Repace
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Tobacco industry efforts at discrediting scientific knowledge of environmental tobacco smoke: a review of internal industry documents.

Authors:  J Drope; S Chapman
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 3.710

Review 4.  Science for hire: a tobacco industry strategy to influence public opinion on secondhand smoke.

Authors:  Monique E Muggli; Richard D Hurt; D Douglas Blanke
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 4.244

5.  Industry-funded research and conflict of interest: an analysis of research sponsored by the tobacco industry through the Center for Indoor Air Research.

Authors:  D E Barnes; L A Bero
Journal:  J Health Polit Policy Law       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 2.265

Review 6.  Tobacco industry success in preventing regulation of secondhand smoke in Latin America: the "Latin Project".

Authors:  J Barnoya; S Glantz
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 7.552

7.  Dietary habits and lung cancer risk among Chinese females in Hong Kong who never smoked.

Authors:  L C Koo
Journal:  Nutr Cancer       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 2.900

8.  Lung cancer risk and mutagenicity of tea.

Authors:  F J Tewes; L C Koo; T J Meisgen; R Rylander
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 6.498

9.  Do cooking fuels pose a risk for lung cancer? A case-control study of women in Hong Kong.

Authors:  L C Koo; N Lee; J H Ho
Journal:  Ecol Dis       Date:  1983
  9 in total
  17 in total

1.  German tobacco industry's successful efforts to maintain scientific and political respectability to prevent regulation of secondhand smoke.

Authors:  A Bornhäuser; J McCarthy; S A Glantz
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 7.552

Review 2.  Tobacco industry successfully prevented tobacco control legislation in Argentina.

Authors:  E M Sebrié; J Barnoya; E J Pérez-Stable; S A Glantz
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 7.552

3.  Local Nordic tobacco interests collaborated with multinational companies to maintain a united front and undermine tobacco control policies.

Authors:  Heikki Hiilamo; Stanton A Glantz
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2011-12-23       Impact factor: 7.552

Review 4.  The Philippine tobacco industry: "the strongest tobacco lobby in Asia".

Authors:  K Alechnowicz; S Chapman
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 7.552

Review 5.  ARTIST (Asian regional tobacco industry scientist team): Philip Morris' attempt to exert a scientific and regulatory agenda on Asia.

Authors:  E K Tong; S A Glantz
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 7.552

Review 6.  Challenging the epidemiologic evidence on passive smoking: tactics of tobacco industry expert witnesses.

Authors:  John A Francis; Amy K Shea; Jonathan M Samet
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 7.552

7.  "Efforts to Reprioritise the Agenda" in China: British American Tobacco's Efforts to Influence Public Policy on Secondhand Smoke in China.

Authors:  Monique E Muggli; Kelley Lee; Quan Gan; Jon O Ebbert; Richard D Hurt
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2008-12-23       Impact factor: 11.069

8.  Tobacco industry sociological programs to influence public beliefs about smoking.

Authors:  Anne Landman; Daniel K Cortese; Stanton Glantz
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 4.634

9.  The role of corporate credibility in legitimizing disease promotion.

Authors:  Patricia A McDaniel; Ruth E Malone
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2008-12-23       Impact factor: 9.308

10.  Enacting tobacco taxes by direct popular vote in the United States: lessons from 20 years of experience.

Authors:  K L Lum; R L Barnes; S A Glantz
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2009-06-25       Impact factor: 7.552

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.