Literature DB >> 18164524

Tobacco industry sociological programs to influence public beliefs about smoking.

Anne Landman1, Daniel K Cortese, Stanton Glantz.   

Abstract

The multinational tobacco companies responded to arguments about the social costs of smoking and hazards of secondhand smoke by quietly implementing the Social Costs/Social Values project (1979-1989), which relied upon the knowledge and authoritative power of social scientists to construct an alternate cultural repertoire of smoking. Social scientists created and disseminated non-health based, pro-tobacco arguments without fully acknowledging their relationship with the industry. After the US Surgeon General concluded that nicotine was addictive in 1988, the industry responded by forming "Associates for Research in the Science of Enjoyment" (c.1988-1999), whose members toured the world promoting the health benefits of the use of legal substances, including tobacco, for stress relief and relaxation, without acknowledging the industry's role. In this paper we draw on previously secret tobacco industry documents, now available on the Internet to show how both of these programs utilized academic sociologists, political scientists, anthropologists, psychologists, philosophers and economists, and allowed the industry to develop and widely disseminate friendly research through credible channels. Strategies included creating favorable surveys and opinions, infusing them into the lay press and media through press releases, articles and conferences, publishing, promoting and disseminating books, commissioning and placing favorable book reviews, providing media training for book authors and organizing media tours. These programs allowed the tobacco industry to affect public and academic discourse on the social acceptability of smoking.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18164524      PMCID: PMC2267871          DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.11.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  20 in total

Review 1.  "Operation Berkshire": the international tobacco companies' conspiracy.

Authors:  N Francey; S Chapman
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-08-05

Review 2.  The smoke you don't see: uncovering tobacco industry scientific strategies aimed against environmental tobacco smoke policies.

Authors:  M E Muggli; J L Forster; R D Hurt; J L Repace
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Tobacco company set up network of sympathetic scientists.

Authors:  Clare Dyer
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-05-23

4.  Ethical issues at the university-industry interface: a way forward?

Authors:  G R Evans; D E Packham
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 3.525

5.  Manipulating public health research: the nuclear and radiation health establishments.

Authors:  Rudi H Nussbaum
Journal:  Int J Occup Environ Health       Date:  2007 Jul-Sep

6.  The economic costs of smoking-induced illness.

Authors:  B R Luce; S O Schweitzer
Journal:  NIDA Res Monogr       Date:  1977-12

Review 7.  Tobacco industry success in preventing regulation of secondhand smoke in Latin America: the "Latin Project".

Authors:  J Barnoya; S Glantz
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 7.552

8.  How the tobacco industry built its relationship with Hollywood.

Authors:  C Mekemson; S A Glantz
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 7.552

Review 9.  Turning free speech into corporate speech: Philip Morris' efforts to influence U.S. and European journalists regarding the U.S. EPA report on secondhand smoke.

Authors:  Monique E Muggli; Richard D Hurt; Lee B Becker
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 4.018

Review 10.  Tobacco industry efforts to present ventilation as an alternative to smoke-free environments in North America.

Authors:  J Drope; S A Bialous; S A Glantz
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 7.552

View more
  21 in total

1.  The "father of stress" meets "big tobacco": Hans Selye and the tobacco industry.

Authors:  Mark P Petticrew; Kelley Lee
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2010-05-13       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Do we believe the tobacco industry lied to us? Association with smoking behavior in a military population.

Authors:  Robert C Klesges; Deborah A Sherrill-Mittleman; Margaret Debon; G Wayne Talcott; Robert J Vanecek
Journal:  Health Educ Res       Date:  2009-06-15

3.  Enticing the New Lad: Masculinity as a Product of Consumption in Tobacco Industry-Developed Lifestyle Magazines.

Authors:  Daniel K Cortese; Pamela M Ling
Journal:  Men Masc       Date:  2011-04

4.  The potential impact of cannabis legalization on the development of cannabis use disorders.

Authors:  Alan J Budney; Jacob T Borodovsky
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2017-06-28       Impact factor: 4.018

5.  Type A behavior pattern and coronary heart disease: Philip Morris's "crown jewel".

Authors:  Mark P Petticrew; Kelley Lee; Martin McKee
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2012-09-20       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  The tobacco industry, researchers, and ethical access to UK Biobank: using the public interest and public good.

Authors:  Benjamin James Capps; Yvette van der Eijk
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2014-08-14       Impact factor: 9.308

7.  Effects of E-cigarette Advertising Message Form and Cues on Cessation Intention: An Exploratory Study.

Authors:  Catherine L Jo; Seth M Noar; Brian G Southwell; Kurt M Ribisl
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2019-07-12

8.  Tobacco company strategies to identify and promote the benefits of nicotine.

Authors:  Pamela M Ling; Stanton A Glantz
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2018-08-09       Impact factor: 7.552

9.  Tobacco industry attempts to counter the World Bank report Curbing the Epidemic and obstruct the WHO framework convention on tobacco control.

Authors:  Hadii M Mamudu; Ross Hammond; Stanton Glantz
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2008-10-22       Impact factor: 4.634

Review 10.  "Nicotine Nazis strike again": a brief analysis of the use of Nazi rhetoric in attacking tobacco control advocacy.

Authors:  Nick K Schneider; Stanton A Glantz
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 7.552

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.