Literature DB >> 35536854

Prosthetic forefoot and heel stiffness across consecutive foot stiffness categories and sizes.

Anne T Turner1,2, Elizabeth G Halsne1,3, Joshua M Caputo4, Carl S Curran4, Andrew H Hansen5,6, Brian J Hafner3, David C Morgenroth1,3.   

Abstract

Prosthetic foot stiffness plays a key role in the functional mobility of lower limb prosthesis users. However, limited objective data exists to guide selection of the optimal prosthetic foot stiffness category for a given individual. Clinicians often must rely solely on manufacturer recommendations, which are typically based on the intended user's weight and general activity level. Availability of comparable forefoot and heel stiffness data would allow for a better understanding of differences between different commercial prosthetic feet, and also between feet of different stiffness categories and foot sizes. Therefore, this study compared forefoot and heel linear stiffness properties across manufacturer-designated stiffness categories and foot sizes. Mechanical testing was completed for five types of commercial prosthetic feet across a range of stiffness categories and three foot-sizes. Data were collected for 56 prosthetic feet, in total. Testing at two discrete angles was conducted to isolate loading of the heel and forefoot components, respectively. Each prosthetic foot was loaded for six cycles while force and displacement data were collected. Forefoot and heel measured stiffness were both significantly associated with stiffness category (p = .001). There was no evidence that the relationships between stiffness category and measured stiffness differed by foot size (stiffness category by size interaction p = .80). However, there were inconsistencies between the expected and measured stiffness changes across stiffness categories (i.e., magnitude of stiffness changes varied substantially between consecutive stiffness categories of the same feet). While statistical results support that, on average, measured stiffness is positively correlated with stiffness category, force-displacement data suggest substantial variation in measured stiffness across consecutive categories. Published objective mechanical property data for commercial prosthetic feet would likely therefore be helpful to clinicians during prescription.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35536854      PMCID: PMC9089881          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0268136

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


  20 in total

1.  Comparison of methods for the calculation of energy storage and return in a dynamic elastic response prosthesis.

Authors:  M D Geil; M Parnianpour; P Quesada; N Berme; S Simon
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 2.712

2.  Stiffness and hysteresis properties of some prosthetic feet.

Authors:  H W van Jaarsveld; H J Grootenboer; J de Vries; H F Koopman
Journal:  Prosthet Orthot Int       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 1.895

3.  Heel-region properties of prosthetic feet and shoes.

Authors:  Glenn K Klute; Jocelyn S Berge; Ava D Segal
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  2004-07

Review 4.  A systematic literature review of the effect of different prosthetic components on human functioning with a lower-limb prosthesis.

Authors:  Harmen van der Linde; Cheriel J Hofstad; Alexander C H Geurts; Klaas Postema; Jan H B Geertzen; Jacques van Limbeek
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  2004-07

5.  The influence of energy storage and return foot stiffness on walking mechanics and muscle activity in below-knee amputees.

Authors:  Nicholas P Fey; Glenn K Klute; Richard R Neptune
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2011-07-20       Impact factor: 2.063

6.  Instantaneous stiffness and hysteresis of dynamic elastic response prosthetic feet.

Authors:  Christina M Webber; Kenton Kaufman
Journal:  Prosthet Orthot Int       Date:  2016-12-23       Impact factor: 1.895

7.  Systematic variation of prosthetic foot spring affects center-of-mass mechanics and metabolic cost during walking.

Authors:  Karl E Zelik; Steven H Collins; Peter G Adamczyk; Ava D Segal; Glenn K Klute; David C Morgenroth; Michael E Hahn; Michael S Orendurff; Joseph M Czerniecki; Arthur D Kuo
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2011-06-23       Impact factor: 3.802

8.  The effects of prosthetic ankle stiffness on stability of gait in people with transtibial amputation.

Authors:  Matthew J Major; Martin Twiste; Laurence P J Kenney; David Howard
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  2016

Review 9.  Prescription of prosthetic ankle-foot mechanisms after lower limb amputation.

Authors:  C Hofstad; H Linde; J Limbeek; K Postema
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2004

10.  Mechanical and dynamic characterization of prosthetic feet for high activity users during weighted and unweighted walking.

Authors:  Sara R Koehler-McNicholas; Eric A Nickel; Kyle Barrons; Kathryn E Blaharski; Clifford A Dellamano; Samuel F Ray; Barri L Schnall; Brad D Hendershot; Andrew H Hansen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-09-12       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.