Literature DB >> 30769210

Foot and shoe responsible for majority of soft tissue work in early stance of walking.

Eric C Honert1, Karl E Zelik2.   

Abstract

Soft tissues located throughout the human body are known to perform substantial mechanical work through wobbling and deforming, particularly following foot impacts with the ground. Yet, it is not known which specific tissues in the body are responsible for the majority of the soft tissue work. The purpose of this study was to quantify how much of the soft tissue work after foot contact was due to the foot and shoe, vs. from tissues elsewhere in the body, and how this distribution of work changed with walking speed and slope. We collected ground reaction forces and whole-body kinematics while ten subjects walked at five speeds (0.8-1.6 m/s) and on seven different slopes (9 degrees downhill to 9 degrees uphill). Using a previously-published Energy-Accounting analysis, we found that the majority of the soft tissue work during early stance was due to deformation of the foot and shoe. The percentage of work did not vary significantly with speed but did vary significantly with slope. The foot and shoe were responsible for ∼60-70% of the soft tissue work during level and uphill walking, and 80-90% during downhill walking.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Distal foot power; Energy absorption; Heel pad; Shoe cushioning; Slope walking

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30769210      PMCID: PMC8777387          DOI: 10.1016/j.humov.2019.01.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Mov Sci        ISSN: 0167-9457            Impact factor:   2.161


  39 in total

1.  Experimental investigations into the physical properties of the intervertebral disc.

Authors:  W J VIRGIN
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1951-11

2.  Low back three-dimensional joint forces, kinematics, and kinetics during walking.

Authors:  J P Callaghan; A E Patla; S M McGill
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 2.063

3.  Simultaneous positive and negative external mechanical work in human walking.

Authors:  J Maxwell Donelan; Rodger Kram; Arthur D Kuo
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 2.712

4.  The mechanical properties of the human heel pad: a paradox resolved.

Authors:  P Aerts; R F Ker; D De Clercq; D W Ilsley; R M Alexander
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 2.712

5.  A model for the estimation of visceral mass displacement in periodic movements.

Authors:  A E Minetti; G Belli
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 2.712

6.  The 'impact' of force filtering cut-off frequency on the peak knee abduction moment during landing: artefact or 'artifiction'?

Authors:  Benjamin D Roewer; Kevin R Ford; Gregory D Myer; Timothy E Hewett
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2012-08-14       Impact factor: 13.800

7.  Mechanical work performed by the individual legs during uphill and downhill walking.

Authors:  Jason R Franz; Nicholas E Lyddon; Rodger Kram
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2011-11-17       Impact factor: 2.712

Review 8.  Ankle and foot power in gait analysis: Implications for science, technology and clinical assessment.

Authors:  Karl E Zelik; Eric C Honert
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2018-04-18       Impact factor: 2.712

9.  In vivo examination of the dynamic properties of the human heel pad.

Authors:  H Kinoshita; T Ogawa; K Kuzuhara; K Ikuta
Journal:  Int J Sports Med       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 3.118

10.  Shock absorbency of factors in the shoe/heel interaction--with special focus on role of the heel pad.

Authors:  U Jørgensen; F Bojsen-Møller
Journal:  Foot Ankle       Date:  1989-06
View more
  7 in total

1.  Differential activation of lumbar and sacral motor pools during walking at different speeds and slopes.

Authors:  A H Dewolf; Y P Ivanenko; K E Zelik; F Lacquaniti; P A Willems
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-07-10       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Walking with added mass magnifies salient features of human foot energetics.

Authors:  Nikolaos Papachatzis; Philippe Malcolm; Carl A Nelson; Kota Z Takahashi
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2020-06-26       Impact factor: 3.312

3.  Does the Heel's Dissipative Energetic Behavior Affect Its Thermodynamic Responses During Walking?

Authors:  Nikolaos Papachatzis; Dustin R Slivka; Iraklis I Pipinos; Kendra K Schmid; Kota Z Takahashi
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-06-27

4.  Changes in ankle work, foot work, and tibialis anterior activation throughout a long run.

Authors:  Eric C Honert; Florian Ostermair; Vinzenz von Tscharner; Benno M Nigg
Journal:  J Sport Health Sci       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 13.077

5.  Association between foot thermal responses and shear forces during turning gait in young adults.

Authors:  Angel E Gonzalez; Ana Pineda Gutierrez; Andrew M Kern; Kota Z Takahashi
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2021-01-18       Impact factor: 2.984

6.  Mechanical work accounts for most of the energetic cost in human running.

Authors:  R C Riddick; A D Kuo
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-01-12       Impact factor: 4.996

7.  Effects of age and speed on the ankle-foot system's power during walking.

Authors:  Lucas Santana da Silva; Reginaldo Kisho Fukuchi; Renato Naville Watanabe; Claudiane Arakaki Fukuchi; Marcos Duarte
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-09-10       Impact factor: 4.379

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.