Literature DB >> 23443748

Early clinical results of a new conservative hip stem.

Jaime J Morales de Cano1, Christian Gordo, Jose M Illobre.   

Abstract

Conservative stems conserve a larger amount of bone, and due to their biomechanical effect, they allow higher compression forces on the lateral column of the femur and reduce stress shielding. Since they conserve metaphyseal bone, short stems allow the use of conventional stems when revision surgery becomes necessary. The authors present the early results of a new bone conserving stem GTS (Biomet). A total of 80 patients (55 men and 25 women) were enroled in this prospective study and received 81 GTS stem (1 bilateral). Their mean age was 64.8 years (range 43-78) at the time of surgery. The mean follow-up was 16 months (range 6-24 month). The clinical assessment was performed by a single surgeon using the Merle d'Aubigné scale; radiographic complications were described. There was one calcar fracture, which required a fixation with a screw. No cases of clinical or radiological loosening were reported. GTS Conservative hip arthroplasty stem has proven to be an excellent implant for femoral hip replacement, with expectations that it may exceed the durability of other types of implants without harming the femoral diaphysis. This may facilitate eventual stem revision and give surgeons the opportunity of using a standard primary implant.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23443748     DOI: 10.1007/s00590-013-1198-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol        ISSN: 1633-8065


  32 in total

1.  A computed tomography assessment of femoral and acetabular bone changes after total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  R Schmidt; L Muller; A Kress; H Hirschfelder; A Aplas; R P Pitto
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2002-06-28       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  What we have learned about long-term cementless fixation from autopsy retrievals.

Authors:  Christi J Sychterz; Alexandra M Claus; Charles A Engh
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Radiological findings and clinical results of 102 thrust-plate femoral hip prostheses: a follow-up of 2 to 8 years.

Authors:  Martin L Buergi; Karl K Stoffel; Hilaire A C Jacob; Heinz H Bereiter
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 4.757

4.  Bone remodeling characteristics of a short-stemmed total hip replacement.

Authors:  Hsiang-Ho Chen; Bernard F Morrey; Kai-Nan An; Zong-Ping Luo
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2008-10-09       Impact factor: 4.757

5.  [Medium-term results of the Mayo™ short-stem hip prosthesis after avascular necrosis of the femoral head].

Authors:  A Zeh; A Weise; A Vasarhelyi; A G Bach; D Wohlrab
Journal:  Z Orthop Unfall       Date:  2011-03-21       Impact factor: 0.923

6.  [Conservative femoral implants. Short stems].

Authors:  C Valverde-Mordt; D Valverde-Belda
Journal:  Rev Esp Cir Ortop Traumatol       Date:  2011-10-14

7.  Porous-coated hip replacement. The factors governing bone ingrowth, stress shielding, and clinical results.

Authors:  C A Engh; J D Bobyn; A H Glassman
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1987-01

8.  Early migration and late aseptic failure of proximal femoral prostheses.

Authors:  M A Freeman; P Plante-Bordeneuve
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1994-05

9.  Early experience with the Depuy Proxima short stem in total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Kálmin Tóth; László Mécs; Péter Kellermann
Journal:  Acta Orthop Belg       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 0.500

10.  The Mayo cementless femoral component in active patients with osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Dietmar Goebel; Wolfgang Schultz
Journal:  Hip Int       Date:  2009 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.135

View more
  6 in total

1.  Two- to 4-Year Followup of a Short Stem THA Construct: Excellent Fixation, Thigh Pain a Concern.

Authors:  Richard L Amendola; Devon D Goetz; Steve S Liu; John J Callaghan
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Comparing return to sport activities after short metaphyseal femoral arthroplasty with resurfacing and big femoral head arthroplasties.

Authors:  Panagiotis K Karampinas; Eustratios G Papadelis; John A Vlamis; Hlias Basiliadis; Spiros G Pneumaticos
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2017-01-03

3.  Blood loss in primary total hip arthroplasty with a short versus conventional cementless stem: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Mattia Loppini; Antonello Della Rocca; Davide Ferrentino; Costanza Pizzi; Guido Grappiolo
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2020-08-02       Impact factor: 3.067

4.  Differential proteomic screening and identification for non-traumatic necrotic femoral osseous tissue.

Authors:  Peng Yan; Yeping Zhu; Hui Zhao; Yanyan Lu; Yuzhong Gao
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2017-04-12       Impact factor: 2.447

5.  Uncemented short stems in primary total hip arthroplasty: The state of the art.

Authors:  Mattia Loppini; Guido Grappiolo
Journal:  EFORT Open Rev       Date:  2018-05-09

6.  Periprosthetic stress fracture around a well-fixed type 2B short uncemented stem.

Authors:  Pablo Ariel Slullitel; Jose Ignacio Oñativia; Lionel Llano; Fernando Comba; Gerardo Zanotti; Francisco Piccaluga; Martin Alejandro Buttaro
Journal:  SICOT J       Date:  2018-07-30
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.