Literature DB >> 15543786

The behavior of several microionization chambers in small intensity modulated radiotherapy fields.

M Stasi1, B Baiotto, G Barboni, G Scielzo.   

Abstract

The aim of this work is to compare different ion chambers available for dose measurements in small fields used in intensity modulated radiotherapy. Some dosimetric aspects, related to these small radiation fields, i.e., lack of electronic lateral equilibrium and steep dose region, must be evaluated, in order to obtain an accurate technique implementation. Furthermore, the size of the sensitive volume of the chambers compared with the mapping of the beams or segments needs consideration. If the size of the chamber is too large for the flatness of the field, the measurement can deviate from the expected absorbed dose at a point. We propose a comparison of various dosimetric values between different microionization chambers with respect to a smaller dosimeter, such as the diamond detector.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15543786     DOI: 10.1118/1.1788911

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  12 in total

1.  Polarity correction factor for flattening filter free photon beams in several cylindrical ionization chambers.

Authors:  Toshiyuki Ogata; Kazuyuki Uehara; Masao Nakayama; Shinji Tsudou; Takashi Masutani; Takanobu Okayama
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2016-02-12

2.  The change of response of ionization chambers in the penumbra and transmission regions: impact for IMRT verification.

Authors:  D González-Castaño; J Pena; F Sánchez-Doblado; G H Hartmann; F Gómez; A Leal
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2007-09-08       Impact factor: 2.602

3.  Total scatter factors of small beams: a multidetector and Monte Carlo study.

Authors:  Paolo Francescon; Stefania Cora; Carlo Cavedon
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Investigating the Electronic Portal Imaging Device for Small Radiation Field Measurements.

Authors:  Arpita Agarwal; Nikhil Rastogi; K J Maria Das; S A Yoganathan; D Udayakumar; Shaleen Kumar
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2017 Apr-Jun

5.  The effect of influence quantities and detector orientation on small-field patient-specific IMRT QA: comparison of measurements with various ionization chambers.

Authors:  Henry Finlay Godson; Ravikumar Manickam; Sathiyan Saminathan; Kadirampatti Mani Ganesh; Retna Ponmalar
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2016-12-01

6.  Dosimetric characterization and behaviour in small X-ray fields of a microchamber and a plastic scintillator detector.

Authors:  Massimo Pasquino; Claudia Cutaia; Lorenzo Radici; Serena Valzano; Eva Gino; Carlo Cavedon; Michele Stasi
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-11-09       Impact factor: 3.039

7.  Optimized point dose measurement: An effective tool for QA in intensity-modulated radiotherapy.

Authors:  Alok Kumar; Gautam Mukherjee; Girigesh Yadav; Vinod Pandey; Kalyan Bhattacharya
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2007-10

8.  Dosimetric study of 2D ion chamber array matrix for the modern radiotherapy treatment verification.

Authors:  Sathiyan Saminathan; Ravikumar Manickam; Varatharaj Chandraraj; Sanjay S Supe
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2010-04-19       Impact factor: 2.102

9.  Percent depth-dose distribution discrepancies from very small volume ion chambers.

Authors:  Vikren Sarkar; Brian Wang; Hui Zhao; Bart Lynch; Joshua A James; Kiernan T McCullough; Bill J Salter
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2015-03-08       Impact factor: 2.102

10.  Different Dosimeters/Detectors Used in Small-Field Dosimetry: Pros and Cons.

Authors:  Wrya Parwaie; Soheila Refahi; Mahdieh Afkhami Ardekani; Bagher Farhood
Journal:  J Med Signals Sens       Date:  2018 Jul-Sep
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.