Literature DB >> 16489466

[Cervical disc prostheses].

E W Fritsch1, T Pitzen.   

Abstract

Endoprosthetic replacement for spinal cord disorders represents an attractive alternative to fusion in those cases where surgery appears necessary for degenerative disc disease. At least in theory it has been proven that placement of an endoprosthesis minimizes undue stress on the adjoining segments and its possible negative consequences. Furthermore, cervical endoprostheses facilitate speedier rehabilitation and the problems involved in removal of the bone chip become irrelevant. Clinical results reported to date for the cervical spine are very encouraging and indicate that endoprosthetic replacement has been quite successful particularly for difficulties in multilevel approaches. However, long-term results for cervical endoprostheses have not yet been published and therefore at present there are no reference values for the viability of the prosthesis with regard to the aseptic loosening rate. There are also no findings available on how the implanted cervical prosthesis will behave when bone quality diminishes at an advanced age.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16489466     DOI: 10.1007/s00132-006-0928-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthopade        ISSN: 0085-4530            Impact factor:   1.087


  46 in total

1.  General principles of total disc replacement arthroplasty: seventeen cases in a nonhuman primate model.

Authors:  Bryan W Cunningham; Anton E Dmitriev; Nianbin Hu; Paul C McAfee
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2003-10-15       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  The Bryan cervical disc prosthesis as an alternative to arthrodesis in the treatment of cervical spondylosis: 46 consecutive cases.

Authors:  J Lafuente; A T H Casey; A Petzold; S Brew
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2005-04

3.  Kinematic analysis of the cervical spine following implantation of an artificial cervical disc.

Authors:  Gwynedd E Pickett; Jeffrey P Rouleau; Neil Duggal
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2005-09-01       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  The new Frenchay artificial cervical joint: results from a two-year pilot study.

Authors:  Crispin C Wigfield; Steven S Gill; Richard J Nelson; Newton H Metcalf; James T Robertson
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2002-11-15       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  A comparative analysis of fusion rates and donor-site morbidity for autogeneic rib and iliac crest bone grafts in posterior cervical fusions.

Authors:  P D Sawin; V C Traynelis; A H Menezes
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 5.115

6.  A prospective randomized multicenter clinical evaluation of an anterior cervical fusion cage.

Authors:  R J Hacker; J C Cauthen; T J Gilbert; S L Griffith
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-10-15       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Immediate and sustained relief of levodopa-induced dyskinesias after dorsal relocation of a deep brain stimulation lead. Case report.

Authors:  Ron L Alterman; Jay L Shils; Mark Gudesblatt; Michele Tagliati
Journal:  Neurosurg Focus       Date:  2004-07-15       Impact factor: 4.047

8.  Early experiences with cervical disc prostheses.

Authors:  B Jöllenbeck; R Hahne; A Schubert; R Firsching
Journal:  Zentralbl Neurochir       Date:  2004

9.  Preliminary clinical experience with the Bryan Cervical Disc Prosthesis.

Authors:  Jan Goffin; Adrian Casey; Pierre Kehr; Klaus Liebig; Bengt Lind; Carlo Logroscino; Vincent Pointillart; Frank Van Calenbergh; Johannes van Loon
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 4.654

10.  The Bryan Cervical Disc: wear properties and early clinical results.

Authors:  Paul A Anderson; Rick C Sasso; Jeffrey P Rouleau; Cathy S Carlson; Jan Goffin
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2004 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.166

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.