Literature DB >> 18496689

Clinical and radiographic reports following cervical arthroplasty: a 24-month follow-up.

Yan Cai Yang1, Lin Nie, Lei Cheng, Yong Hou.   

Abstract

We reviewed patients with cervical disc prosthesis replacement for single-level cervical disc disease to evaluate its clinical effect and maintenance of cervical spine motion. Fifteen patients underwent Bryan artificial cervical disc replacement and were followed-up for at least 24 months. No neurological or vascular complications were observed during or after operation. JOA, VAS, and NDI scores showed statistical significant improvement in our follow-up. The procedure achieved an 87% (13/15) satisfactory rate at 24-month evaluations according to Odom's criteria. The range of motion (ROM) of the cervical spine, treated segment, adjacent segment, and functional spinal unit (FSU) decreased at early follow-up, but they recovered to the preoperative level at 12- and 24-month follow-up. Also, preoperative lordosis of the cervical spine and FSU were not only maintained but also even improved during the 24-month follow-up. No obvious degeneration of adjacent discs were found at MRI. There were no cases of prosthesis subsidence or extrusion. The cervical disc prosthesis showed a good clinical outcome; it also restored ROM of the cervical spine and reestablished cervical curvature in our 24-month follow-up. But to be sure of its long term effect, a longer follow-up is needed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18496689      PMCID: PMC2898988          DOI: 10.1007/s00264-008-0571-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  25 in total

1.  Clinical and radiological results following cervical arthroplasty.

Authors:  D H Yoon; S Yi; H C Shin; K N Kim; S H Kim
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2006-06-23       Impact factor: 2.216

2.  Changes in adjacent-level disc pressure and facet joint force after cervical arthroplasty compared with cervical discectomy and fusion.

Authors:  Ung-Kyu Chang; Daniel H Kim; Max C Lee; Rafer Willenberg; Se-Hoon Kim; Jesse Lim
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2007-07

3.  Effects of a cervical disc prosthesis on maintaining sagittal alignment of the functional spinal unit and overall sagittal balance of the cervical spine.

Authors:  Seok Woo Kim; Jae Hyuk Shin; Jose Joefrey Arbatin; Moon Soo Park; Yung Khee Chung; Paul C McAfee
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-08-25       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  The Bryan cervical disc prosthesis as an alternative to arthrodesis in the treatment of cervical spondylosis: 46 consecutive cases.

Authors:  J Lafuente; A T H Casey; A Petzold; S Brew
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2005-04

5.  Intradiscal pressure measurements above an instrumented fusion. A cadaveric study.

Authors:  S L Weinhoffer; R D Guyer; M Herbert; S L Griffith
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1995-03-01       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Radiographic changes following anterior cervical fusion.

Authors:  L Y Hunter; E M Braunstein; R W Bailey
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1980 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Kyphotic malalignment after anterior cervical fusion is one of the factors promoting the degenerative process in adjacent intervertebral levels.

Authors:  A Katsuura; S Hukuda; Y Saruhashi; K Mori
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Cervical arthroplasty in the management of spondylotic myelopathy: 18-month results.

Authors:  Lali H S Sekhon
Journal:  Neurosurg Focus       Date:  2004-09-15       Impact factor: 4.047

9.  The Bryan Cervical Disc: wear properties and early clinical results.

Authors:  Paul A Anderson; Rick C Sasso; Jeffrey P Rouleau; Cathy S Carlson; Jan Goffin
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2004 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.166

10.  Clinical report of cervical arthroplasty in management of spondylotic myelopathy in Chinese.

Authors:  Yan Wang; Xuesong Zhang; Songhua Xiao; Ning Lu; Zheng Wang; Mi Zhou
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2006-11-04       Impact factor: 2.359

View more
  16 in total

Review 1.  Cervical spine alignment in disc arthroplasty: should we change our perspective?

Authors:  Alberto Di Martino; Rocco Papalia; Erika Albo; Leonardo Cortesi; Luca Denaro; Vincenzo Denaro
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-10-06       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Spinal fusion-hardware construct: Basic concepts and imaging review.

Authors:  Mohamed Ragab Nouh
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2012-05-28

3.  Heterotopic ossification following cervical total disc replacement: iatrogenic or constitutional?

Authors:  Hyun-Jin Cho; Myung-Hoon Shin; Jung-Woo Huh; Kyeong-Sik Ryu; Chun-Kun Park
Journal:  Korean J Spine       Date:  2012-09-30

4.  Clinical and radiological analysis of Bryan cervical disc arthroplasty: eight-year follow-up results compared with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.

Authors:  Tao Lei; Yaming Liu; Hui Wang; Jiaxin Xu; Qinghua Ma; Linfeng Wang; Yong Shen
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 5.  Comparison of artificial cervical arthroplasty versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for one-level cervical degenerative disc disease: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Jiaquan Luo; Sheng Huang; Min Gong; Xuejun Dai; Manman Gao; Ting Yu; Zhiyu Zhou; Xuenong Zou
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2014-07-18

Review 6.  Polyurethane on titanium unconstrained disc arthroplasty versus anterior discectomy and fusion for the treatment of cervical disc disease: a review of level I-II randomized clinical trials including clinical outcomes.

Authors:  María Aragonés; Eduardo Hevia; Carlos Barrios
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-09-12       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Full-endoscopic anterior decompression versus conventional anterior decompression and fusion in cervical disc herniations.

Authors:  Sebastian Ruetten; Martin Komp; Harry Merk; Georgios Godolias
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2008-11-18       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  A meta-analysis comparing the results of cervical disc arthroplasty with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) for the treatment of symptomatic cervical disc disease.

Authors:  Yu Gao; Ming Liu; Tao Li; Fuguo Huang; Tingting Tang; Zhou Xiang
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2013-03-20       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 9.  Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) versus cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) for two contiguous levels cervical disc degenerative disease: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Shihua Zou; Junyi Gao; Bin Xu; Xiangdong Lu; Yongbin Han; Hui Meng
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-06-17       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  The Changes in Cervical Biomechanics After CTDR and Its Association With Heterotopic Ossification: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Nicholas Hui; Kevin Phan; Mei-Yi Lee; Jack Kerferd; Telvinderjit Singh; Ralph J Mobbs
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2020-06-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.