Literature DB >> 15538181

Direct current stimulation over MT+/V5 modulates motion aftereffect in humans.

Andrea Antal1, Edina T Varga, Michael A Nitsche, Zoltan Chadaide, Walter Paulus, Gyula Kovács, Zoltán Vidnyánszky.   

Abstract

While there is strong evidence for the central role of the human MT+/V5 in motion processing, its involvement in motion adaptation is still the subject of debate. We used transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) to test whether MT+/V5 is part of the neural network involved in the long-term adaptation-induced motion after-effect in humans. It was found that both cathodal and anodal stimulation over MT+/V5 resulted in a significant reduction of the perceived motion after-effect duration, but had no effect on performance in a luminance-change-detection task used to determine attentional load during adaptation. Our control experiment excluded the possibility that the observed MT+/V5 stimulation effects were due to a diffused modulation of the early cortical areas, i.e. by the stimulation applied over MT+/V5. These results provide evidence that external modulation of neural excitability in human MT+/V5 affects the strength of perceived motion after-effect and support the involvement of MT+/V5 in motion adaptation processes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15538181     DOI: 10.1097/00001756-200411150-00012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroreport        ISSN: 0959-4965            Impact factor:   1.837


  23 in total

1.  Visual evoked potentials modulation during direct current cortical polarization.

Authors:  Neri Accornero; Pietro Li Voti; Maurizio La Riccia; Bruno Gregori
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-10-19       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation on posterior parietal cortex disrupts visuo-spatial processing in the contralateral visual field.

Authors:  L Schweid; R J Rushmore; A Valero-Cabré
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-01-15       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 3.  Position specificity of adaptation-related face aftereffects.

Authors:  Márta Zimmer; Gyula Kovács
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2011-02-27       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Contrasting effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on central and peripheral visual fields.

Authors:  Thiago L Costa; Mirella Gualtieri; Mirella T S Barboni; Rafael K Katayama; Paulo S Boggio; Dora F Ventura
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-02-04       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation Attenuates Neuronal Adaptation.

Authors:  Kohitij Kar; Jacob Duijnhouwer; Bart Krekelberg
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-01-30       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Transcranial direct current stimulation over posterior parietal cortex modulates visuospatial localization.

Authors:  Jessica M Wright; Bart Krekelberg
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-08-07       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  Transcranial alternating current stimulation attenuates visual motion adaptation.

Authors:  Kohitij Kar; Bart Krekelberg
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-05-21       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  The postcentral gyrus shows sustained fMRI activation during the tactile motion aftereffect.

Authors:  Peggy J Planetta; Philip Servos
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-11-26       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Transcranial direct current stimulation and simultaneous functional magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Marcus Meinzer; Robert Lindenberg; Robert Darkow; Lena Ulm; David Copland; Agnes Flöel
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2014-04-27       Impact factor: 1.355

Review 10.  The motion aftereffect reloaded.

Authors:  George Mather; Andrea Pavan; Gianluca Campana; Clara Casco
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2008-10-24       Impact factor: 20.229

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.