Literature DB >> 19603888

Investigating the effects of stimulus duration and context on pitch perception by cochlear implant users.

Joshua S Stohl1, Chandra S Throckmorton, Leslie M Collins.   

Abstract

Cochlear implant sound processing strategies that use time-varying pulse rates to transmit fine structure information are one proposed method for improving the spectral representation of a sound with the eventual goal of improving speech recognition in noisy conditions, speech recognition in tonal languages, and music identification and appreciation. However, many of the perceptual phenomena associated with time-varying rates are not well understood. In this study, the effects of stimulus duration on both the place and rate-pitch percepts were investigated via psychophysical experiments. Four Nucleus CI24 cochlear implant users participated in these experiments, which included a short-duration pitch ranking task and three adaptive pulse rate discrimination tasks. When duration was fixed from trial-to-trial and rate was varied adaptively, results suggested that both the place-pitch and rate-pitch percepts may be independent of duration for durations above 10 and 20 ms, respectively. When duration was varied and pulse rates were fixed, performance was highly variable within and across subjects. Implications for multi-rate sound processing strategies are discussed.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19603888      PMCID: PMC2723905          DOI: 10.1121/1.3133246

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  31 in total

1.  Comparison of speech recognition with different speech coding strategies (SPEAK, CIS, and ACE) and their relationship to telemetric measures of compound action potentials in the nucleus CI 24M cochlear implant system.

Authors:  J Kiefer; S Hohl; E Stürzebecher; T Pfennigdorff; W Gstöettner
Journal:  Audiology       Date:  2001 Jan-Feb

2.  A comparison of two loudness balancing tasks in cochlear implant subjects using bipolar stimulation.

Authors:  C S Throckmorton; L M Collins
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 3.570

3.  Temporal pitch in electric hearing.

Authors:  Fan Gang Zeng
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Speech perception, localization, and lateralization with bilateral cochlear implants.

Authors:  Richard J M van Hoesel; Richard S Tyler
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Mandarin tone recognition in cochlear-implant subjects.

Authors:  Chao-Gang Wei; Keli Cao; Fan-Gang Zeng
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 3.208

Review 6.  Music perception with cochlear implants: a review.

Authors:  Hugh J McDermott
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2004

7.  A novel speech-processing strategy incorporating tonal information for cochlear implants.

Authors:  N Lan; K B Nie; S K Gao; F G Zeng
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 4.538

8.  HiResolution and conventional sound processing in the HiResolution bionic ear: using appropriate outcome measures to assess speech recognition ability.

Authors:  Dawn Burton Koch; Mary Joe Osberger; Phil Segel; Dorcas Kessler
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2004 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.854

9.  Speech and music perception with the new fine structure speech coding strategy: preliminary results.

Authors:  Christoph Arnoldner; Dominik Riss; Markus Brunner; Martin Durisin; Wolf-Dieter Baumgartner; Jafar-Sasan Hamzavi
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 1.494

10.  The time course of attention in a simple auditory detection task.

Authors:  Beverly A Wright; Matthew B Fitzgerald
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2004-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.