Literature DB >> 16137580

Development of a dedicated hepatopancreaticobiliary program in a university hospital system.

Steven R Granger1, Robert E Glasgow, Jean Battaglia, Ruey-Min Lee, Courtney Scaife, Dennis C Shrieve, David Avrin, Sean J Mulvihill.   

Abstract

In 2001, a dedicated hepatopancreatobiliary (HPB) cancer program was established at a large, university hospital. Changes included recruitment of specialized HPB faculty, standardization of patient protocols, development of coordinated multidisciplinary research and clinical efforts, collection of prospective surgical outcomes data, and construction of a dedicated cancer hospital. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of this program on a university health system including effects on patient volume, surgical volume, outcomes, costs, resident education, and research productivity. Hospital and departmental databases were reviewed for all records pertaining to HPB surgical cases, diagnosis, and financial information over a 6-year period, including 2 years before (1999-2000) and 4 years after (2001-2004) HPB program development. A more than two-fold increase in the number of distinct patients who had HPB diagnosis was seen across all pertinent departments. A five-fold increase in surgical volume was observed. A multidisciplinary approach to care was implemented, leading to a four-fold increase in sharing of patients across departments. Improvements in operative mortality, hospital contribution margin, resident operative experience, and research productivity were observed. The implementation of a dedicated HPB cancer program with coordinated and standardized research, educational, and clinical efforts had measurable institutional benefit.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16137580     DOI: 10.1016/j.gassur.2005.06.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg        ISSN: 1091-255X            Impact factor:   3.452


  15 in total

Review 1.  Hospital and physician volume or specialization and outcomes in cancer treatment: importance in quality of cancer care.

Authors:  B E Hillner; T J Smith; C E Desch
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  The establishment of a cancer center.

Authors:  W B Hutchinson
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  1977       Impact factor: 3.454

3.  Investigation of the relationship between volume and mortality for surgical procedures performed in New York State hospitals.

Authors:  E L Hannan; J F O'Donnell; H Kilburn; H R Bernard; A Yazici
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1989-07-28       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Volume standards for high-risk surgical procedures: potential benefits of the Leapfrog initiative.

Authors:  J D Birkmeyer; E V Finlayson; C M Birkmeyer
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 3.982

5.  Hospital volume influences outcome in patients undergoing pancreatic resection for cancer.

Authors:  R E Glasgow; S J Mulvihill
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1996-11

6.  The benefits of a dedicated minimally invasive surgery program to academic general surgery practice.

Authors:  Robert E Glasgow; Kathy A Adamson; Sean J Mulvihill
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 3.452

7.  Impact of hospital volume on operative mortality for major cancer surgery.

Authors:  C B Begg; L D Cramer; W J Hoskins; M F Brennan
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1998-11-25       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Integrated cardiac care.

Authors:  G L Hallman; C Edmonds
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 4.330

9.  The relationship between hospital volume and outcomes of hepatic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  R E Glasgow; J A Showstack; P P Katz; C U Corvera; R S Warren; S J Mulvihill
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1999-01

10.  Major HPB procedures must be undertaken in high volume quaternary centres?

Authors:  A N Kingsnorth
Journal:  HPB Surg       Date:  2000
View more
  4 in total

1.  Multidisciplinary management of colorectal cancer enhances access to multimodal therapy and compliance with National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines.

Authors:  Rebecca A Levine; Bhani Chawla; Shelli Bergeron; Harry Wasvary
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2012-05-30       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  The challenges of resident training in complex hepatic, pancreatic, and biliary procedures.

Authors:  Thomas S Helling; Anjay Khandelwal
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2007-10-23       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  How to improve surgical outcomes.

Authors:  Peter J E Holt; Jan D Poloniecki; Matt M Thompson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2008-04-21

4.  Training minimal invasive approaches in hepatopancreatobilliary fellowship: the current status.

Authors:  Gokulakkrishna Subhas; Vijay K Mittal
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2010-12-22       Impact factor: 3.647

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.