Literature DB >> 9266641

Cost and benefit of the trained laparoscopic team. A comparative study of a designated nursing team vs a nontrained team.

T A Kenyon1, M P Lenker, T W Bax, L L Swanstrom.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In spite of the emergence of laparoscopic cholecystectomy as the gold standard for treatment of symptomatic gallstones, questions still remain regarding its overall cost effectiveness, especially at low-volume centers where operating room (OR) time and operative complications are higher. We hypothesize that the presence of a well-organized, dedicated laparoscopic OR team will improve surgical outcomes for this procedure. This study compares the operative results of an advanced and a basic laparoscopic surgeon using either a designated laparoscopic operating team or a nondesignated team.
METHODS: The hospital records for 71 elective laparoscopic cholecystectomies with cholangiograms were retrospectively reviewed and anesthesia times and conversion rates were analyzed. Procedures were performed either at a hospital with a dedicated laparoscopy team or a hospital with nondedicated OR personnel. All procedures were done by an advanced laparoscopic surgeon or a basic laparoscopic surgeon.
RESULTS: Case characteristics were evenly matched between sites and surgeons. The mean total anesthesia time at the dedicated site was 120.8 min, compared to 152.3 min at the nondedicated site with a mean difference of 31.5 min (p = 0.001). A 12% conversion rate was documented at the nondedicated site. There were no conversions at the site with a dedicated laparoscopy team. No major complications were encountered in this series.
CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that having a designated laparoscopic trained team provides a time savings to both advanced and basic laparoscopic surgeons. Although no major complications were encountered, there was a significant conversion rate for the less experienced surgeon operating without the support of a trained team. The end result from having a dedicated team in endoscopic surgery is decreased operative time, an improvement in patient care, and decreased costs to the patient and institution.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9266641     DOI: 10.1007/s004649900460

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  19 in total

1.  Prospective cost analysis of laparoscopic vs. open pyeloplasty in children: Single centre contemporary evaluation comparing two procedures over a 1-year period.

Authors:  Katherine Moore; Armando J Lorenzo; Suzanne Turner; Darius J Bägli; Joao L Pippi Salle; Walid A Farhat
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2013 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.862

2.  A laboratory study on anticipatory movement in laparoscopic surgery: a behavioral indicator for team collaboration.

Authors:  B Zheng; L L Swanström; C L MacKenzie
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-12-16       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  The feasibility of introducing advanced minimally invasive surgery into surgical practice.

Authors:  Daniel W Birch; Monali Misra; Forough Farrokhyar
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 2.089

4.  Building an efficient surgical team using a bench model simulation: construct validity of the Legacy Inanimate System for Endoscopic Team Training (LISETT).

Authors:  B Zheng; P M Denk; D V Martinec; P Gatta; M H Whiteford; L L Swanström
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-08-19       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  The composition of surgical teams in the operating room and its impact on surgical team performance in China.

Authors:  Wenjing He; Shenghao Ni; Gengzhen Chen; Xuewu Jiang; Bin Zheng
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-12-06       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Canadian consensus conference on the development of training and practice standards in advanced minimally invasive surgery: Edmonton, Alta., Jun. 1, 2007.

Authors:  Daniel W Birch; H Jaap Bonjer; Claire Crossley; Gayle Burnett; Chris de Gara; Anthony Gomes; John Hagen; Angus G Maciver; C Dale Mercer; O Neely Panton; Chris M Schlachta; Andy J Smith; Garth L Warnock
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 2.089

7.  Surgical team composition differs between laparoscopic and open procedures.

Authors:  Bin Zheng; Eric Fung; Bo Fu; Neely M Panton; Lee L Swanström
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-11-01       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Operative length independently affected by surgical team size: data from 2 Canadian hospitals.

Authors:  Bin Zheng; Ormond N M Panton; Thamer A Al-Tayeb
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 2.089

9.  Collaborative performance in laparoscopic teams: behavioral evidences from simulation.

Authors:  Wenjing He; Bin Zheng
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-02-19       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  The evolution of intraoperative conversion in video assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy.

Authors:  A Vallance; P Tcherveniakov; C Bogdan; N Chaudhuri; R Milton; E Kefaloyannis
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2016-08-09       Impact factor: 1.891

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.