Literature DB >> 12013293

A study of added costs of laparoscopic cholecystectomy based on surgery preference cards.

Jeff W Allen1, Hiram C Polk.   

Abstract

Hospitals are pressured to cut expenses to generate a profit, but many current surgical procedures still fall below a "break-even" point. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is a high-volume surgical procedure that can be profitable for hospitals if costs are reduced and complications minimized. Our limited liability corporation of independent surgical specialists examined the preference cards of ten surgeons who performed laparoscopic cholecystectomies in August 2000. We wished to determine whether these surgeons differed in their use of disposable equipment and devices for the same surgical procedure. All of the disposable equipment and devices studied were assigned a price by the hospital purchasing department that was representative of the hospital costs and not what was billed to the patient. The sum total of disposable instruments for a single operative case in which laparoscopic cholecystectomy was performed ranged from $92 to $637 (mean $333) depending on the preference of the surgeon. Our study points out the differences in expenses between surgeons. Maintaining this type of expense tracking can apply to other procedures and is a good place to start a surgeon-led and hospital-based cost-saving initiative.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12013293

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Surg        ISSN: 0003-1348            Impact factor:   0.688


  9 in total

1.  Prospective cost analysis of laparoscopic vs. open pyeloplasty in children: Single centre contemporary evaluation comparing two procedures over a 1-year period.

Authors:  Katherine Moore; Armando J Lorenzo; Suzanne Turner; Darius J Bägli; Joao L Pippi Salle; Walid A Farhat
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2013 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.862

2.  Quality, safety, and transparency.

Authors:  Hiram C Polk
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  The benefits of a dedicated minimally invasive surgery program to academic general surgery practice.

Authors:  Robert E Glasgow; Kathy A Adamson; Sean J Mulvihill
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  Improving the value of care for appendectomy through an individual surgeon-specific approach.

Authors:  Jamie R Robinson; Nicholas H Carter; Corinne Gibson; Adam S Brinkman; Kyle Van Arendonk; Karen E Speck; Melissa E Danko; Gretchen P Jackson; Harold N Lovvorn; Martin L Blakely
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  2018-03-08       Impact factor: 2.545

5.  Practicing surgeons lead in quality care, safety, and cost control.

Authors:  Eugene H Shively; Michael J Heine; Robert H Schell; J Neal Sharpe; R Neal Garrison; Steven R Vallance; Kenneth J S DeSimone; Hiram C Polk
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 6.  Laparoscopic versus small-incision cholecystectomy for patients with symptomatic cholecystolithiasis.

Authors:  F Keus; J A F de Jong; H G Gooszen; C J H M van Laarhoven
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2006-10-18

7.  Surgeon Variability Impacts Costs in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: the Volume-Cost Relationship.

Authors:  Christopher C Stahl; Shreyans Udani; Patrick B Schwartz; Taylor Aiken; Alexandra W Acher; James R Barrett; Jacob A Greenberg; Daniel E Abbott
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2020-10-09       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 8.  Quality in surgery: current issues for the future.

Authors:  Clifford Y Ko; Melinda Maggard; Michelle Agustin
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.282

Review 9.  Small-incision versus open cholecystectomy for patients with symptomatic cholecystolithiasis.

Authors:  F Keus; J A F de Jong; H G Gooszen; C J H M van Laarhoven
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2006-10-18
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.