Literature DB >> 18200514

Living with genetic risk: effect on adolescent self-concept.

Allyn McConkie-Rosell1, Gail A Spiridigliozzi, Elizabeth Melvin, Deborah V Dawson, Ave M Lachiewicz.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to describe the interplay of adolescent girls' and young womens' self-concept, coping behaviors, and adjustment associated with knowledge of genetic risk for fragile X syndrome. We will report here findings on self-concept. Using a multi-group cross-sectional design this study focused on girls ages 14-25 years from families previously diagnosed with fragile X syndrome, who knew they were (1) carriers (n = 20; mean age 18.35 years s.d. 2.5), or (2) noncarriers (n = 18; mean age 17.78 years s.d. 2.69), or (3) at-risk to be carriers (n = 15; mean age 17.87 s.d. 3.18). The girls completed the Tennessee Self-Concept Scale (TSCS:2), a visual analog scale, and a guided interview. Total and all subscale scores on the TSCS:2 were in the normal range for all three groups. However, threats to self-concept were found in personal self (physical self, genetic identity, and parental role), social self, and family self (family genetic identity) as they specifically related to the meaning of genetic information and varied based on risk status. Our findings suggest that risk information itself is threatening and for some girls, may be as threatening as learning one is a carrier. Certainty related to genetic risk status appears to make a positive difference for some girls by allowing them the opportunity to face the challenge of their genetic risk status and to begin to consider the meaning of this information. (c) 2008 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18200514      PMCID: PMC2756030          DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.c.30161

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet        ISSN: 1552-4868            Impact factor:   3.908


  29 in total

1.  Tay-Sachs screening: social and psychological impact.

Authors:  B Childs; L Gordis; M M Kaback; H H Kazazian
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1976-11       Impact factor: 11.025

2.  Prevalence of fragile X syndrome.

Authors:  G Turner; T Webb; S Wake; H Robinson
Journal:  Am J Med Genet       Date:  1996-07-12

3.  Fragile X syndrome is less common than previously estimated.

Authors:  J E Morton; S Bundey; T P Webb; F MacDonald; P M Rindl; S Bullock
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 6.318

4.  The genetic testing of children. Working Party of the Clinical Genetics Society (UK)

Authors:  A Clarke
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 6.318

5.  Screening and genetic counseling for beta-thalassemia trait in a population unselected for interest: comparison of three counseling methods.

Authors:  P T Rowley; M Lipkin; L Fisher
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1984-05       Impact factor: 11.025

6.  Longitudinal study of the carrier testing process for fragile X syndrome: perceptions and coping.

Authors:  A McConkie-Rosell; G A Spiridigliozzi; J A Sullivan; D V Dawson; A M Lachiewicz
Journal:  Am J Med Genet       Date:  2001-01-01

7.  Carrier testing in fragile X syndrome: effect on self-concept.

Authors:  A McConkie-Rosell; G A Spiridigliozzi; J A Sullivan; D V Dawson; A M Lachiewicz
Journal:  Am J Med Genet       Date:  2000-06-19

Review 8.  The fragile-X premutation: a maturing perspective.

Authors:  Paul J Hagerman; Randi J Hagerman
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2004-03-29       Impact factor: 11.025

9.  Knowledge about and attitudes toward genetic screening among high-school students: the Tay-Sachs experience.

Authors:  C L Clow; C R Scriver
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1977-01       Impact factor: 7.124

10.  Prevalence of carriers of premutation-size alleles of the FMRI gene--and implications for the population genetics of the fragile X syndrome.

Authors:  F Rousseau; P Rouillard; M L Morel; E W Khandjian; K Morgan
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 11.025

View more
  17 in total

1.  Counseling adolescents and the challenges for genetic counselors.

Authors:  Alice Callard; Jessica Williams; Heather Skirton
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2011-12-03       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  Challenges of genetic testing in adolescents with cardiac arrhythmia syndromes.

Authors:  Lilian Liou Cohen; Marina Stolerman; Christine Walsh; David Wasserman; Siobhan M Dolan
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2011-09-27       Impact factor: 2.903

3.  Communication of genetic risk information to daughters in families with fragile X syndrome: the parent's perspective.

Authors:  Allyn McConkie-Rosell; Jacqueline Del Giorno; Elizabeth Melvin Heise
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2010-09-28       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  A framework for youth-friendly genetic counseling.

Authors:  Mary-Anne Young; Kate Thompson; Jeremy Lewin; Lucy Holland
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2019-11-05

Review 5.  Points to Consider: Ethical, Legal, and Psychosocial Implications of Genetic Testing in Children and Adolescents.

Authors:  Jeffrey R Botkin; John W Belmont; Jonathan S Berg; Benjamin E Berkman; Yvonne Bombard; Ingrid A Holm; Howard P Levy; Kelly E Ormond; Howard M Saal; Nancy B Spinner; Benjamin S Wilfond; Joseph D McInerney
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2015-07-02       Impact factor: 11.025

6.  Attitude of medical school students in China towards genetic testing and counseling issues in FXS.

Authors:  Jia Li; Wen Huang; Shiyu Luo; Yunting Lin; Ranhui Duan
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2013-08-18       Impact factor: 2.537

7.  Fragile X screening: attitudes of genetic health professionals.

Authors:  Kruti Acharya; Lainie Friedman Ross
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2009-02-15       Impact factor: 2.802

8.  When to tell and test for genetic carrier status: perspectives of adolescents and young adults from fragile X families.

Authors:  Ramsey M Wehbe; Gail A Spiridigliozzi; Elizabeth M Heise; Deborah V Dawson; Allyn McConkie-Rosell
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 2.802

9.  Experience with genetic counseling: the adolescent perspective.

Authors:  Amanda Pichini; Cheryl Shuman; Karen Sappleton; Miriam Kaufman; David Chitayat; Riyana Babul-Hirji
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2015-11-17       Impact factor: 2.537

10.  Genetic risk communication: experiences of adolescent girls and young women from families with fragile X syndrome.

Authors:  Allyn McConkie-Rosell; Elizabeth Melvin Heise; Gail A Spiridigliozzi
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2009-03-11       Impact factor: 2.537

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.