Literature DB >> 15496996

A Skinfold Model to Predict Fat-Free Mass in Female Athletes.

Evelyn R Warner1, Willa C Fornetti, Jennifer J Jallo, James M Pivarnik.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Despite widespread use of skinfolds to estimate body fatness, few prediction models have been validated on female athletes. Most skinfold models have been validated with hydrodensitometry, which does not account for the variability in bone density that may exist among female athletes. Our purpose was to develop a skinfold model that predicts fat-free mass (FFM) in female collegiate athletes. DESIGN AND
SETTING: A skinfold model was developed using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) as the criterion method. Four skinfold measures (abdominal, suprailiac, thigh, triceps), height, and weight were entered into a regression model. The best model was developed and validated by calculating the predicted error sum of squares statistic.
SUBJECTS: Study participants included 101 National Collegiate Athletic Association Division I female athletes (age = 20.3 +/- 1.4 years, height = 166.7 +/- 7.8 cm, mass = 63.1 +/- 8.1 kg) from several sports. MEASUREMENTS: Each participant's FFM was measured via DEXA. Skinfold thicknesses were measured and entered into the regression model.
RESULTS: The final regression model included mass and abdominal and thigh skinfolds: FFM = 8.51 + (0.809 x mass) - (0.178 x abdominal skinfold) - (0.225 x thigh skinfold). The model showed excellent predictive ability (R = 0.98, standard error of the estimate = 1.1 kg). Pairwise comparisons indicated that prediction error showed no overprediction or underprediction bias.
CONCLUSIONS: In female collegiate athletes, FFM can be predicted accurately from body mass and abdominal and thigh skinfolds. This model is practical and can be used in most athletic settings.

Entities:  

Year:  2004        PMID: 15496996      PMCID: PMC522149     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Athl Train        ISSN: 1062-6050            Impact factor:   2.860


  24 in total

1.  American Academy of Pediatrics. Committee on Sports Medicine and Fitness. Medical concerns in the female athlete.

Authors: 
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 7.124

2.  Prediction of body density in young and middle-aged women.

Authors:  M L Pollock; E E Laughridge; B Coleman; A C Linnerud; A Jackson
Journal:  J Appl Physiol       Date:  1975-04       Impact factor: 3.531

3.  Exercise and bone mineral density in mature female athletes.

Authors:  J E Dook; C James; N K Henderson; R I Price
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 5.411

4.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  American College of Sports Medicine position stand. The Female Athlete Triad.

Authors:  C L Otis; B Drinkwater; M Johnson; A Loucks; J Wilmore
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 5.411

6.  Prediction of body composition in female athletes.

Authors:  J L Mayhew; F C Piper; J A Koss; D H Montaldi
Journal:  J Sports Med Phys Fitness       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 1.637

Review 7.  Research progress in validation of clinical methods of assessing body composition.

Authors:  M L Pollock; A S Jackson
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  1984-12       Impact factor: 5.411

8.  Skinfolds and body density and their relation to body fatness: a review.

Authors:  T G Lohman
Journal:  Hum Biol       Date:  1981-05       Impact factor: 0.553

9.  Generalized equations for predicting body density of women.

Authors:  A S Jackson; M L Pollock; A Ward
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 5.411

10.  Age-related differences in body composition by hydrodensitometry and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.

Authors:  D B Snead; S J Birge; W M Kohrt
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  1993-02
View more
  8 in total

1.  Comparison of the Three-Site and Seven-Site Measurements in Female Collegiate Athletes Using BodyMetrix™.

Authors:  Amanda M Elsey; Alister K Lowe; Ashley N Cornell; Paul N Whitehead; Ryan T Conners
Journal:  Int J Exerc Sci       Date:  2021-04-01

2.  Higher prevalence of exercise-associated hyponatremia in female than in male open-water ultra-endurance swimmers: the 'Marathon-Swim' in Lake Zurich.

Authors:  Sandra Wagner; Beat Knechtle; Patrizia Knechtle; Christoph Alexander Rüst; Thomas Rosemann
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2011-07-12       Impact factor: 3.078

3.  Bone mineral density in collegiate female athletes: comparisons among sports.

Authors:  Lanay M Mudd; Willa Fornetti; James M Pivarnik
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2007 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.860

4.  Body mass index and percentage of body fat as indicators for obesity in an adolescent athletic population.

Authors:  William C Etchison; Elizabeth A Bloodgood; Cholly P Minton; Nancy J Thompson; Mary Ann Collins; Stephen C Hunter; Hongying Dai
Journal:  Sports Health       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 3.843

5.  Comparison of Techniques for Tracking Body Composition Changes across a Season in College Women Basketball Players.

Authors:  Ashley Ploudre; Jana L Arabas; Liz Jorn; Jerry L Mayhew
Journal:  Int J Exerc Sci       Date:  2018-05-01

6.  Anthropometric prediction of DXA-measured body composition in female team handball players.

Authors:  Valentina Cavedon; Carlo Zancanaro; Chiara Milanese
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2018-11-27       Impact factor: 2.984

7.  Changes in foot volume, body composition, and hydration status in male and female 24-hour ultra-mountain bikers.

Authors:  Daniela Chlíbková; Beat Knechtle; Thomas Rosemann; Alena Žákovská; Ivana Tomášková; Marcus Shortall; Iva Tomášková
Journal:  J Int Soc Sports Nutr       Date:  2014-03-24       Impact factor: 5.150

8.  Fluid Metabolism in Athletes Running Seven Marathons in Seven Consecutive Days.

Authors:  Daniela Chlíbková; Pantelis T Nikolaidis; Thomas Rosemann; Beat Knechtle; Josef Bednář
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2018-02-12       Impact factor: 4.566

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.