| Literature DB >> 24661412 |
Daniela Chlíbková1, Beat Knechtle2, Thomas Rosemann2, Alena Žákovská3, Ivana Tomášková4, Marcus Shortall5, Iva Tomášková6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The effects of running and cycling on changes in hydration status and body composition during a 24-hour race have been described previously, but data for 24-hour ultra-mountain bikers are missing. The present study investigated changes in foot volume, body composition, and hydration status in male and female 24-hour ultra-mountain bikers.Entities:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24661412 PMCID: PMC3994394 DOI: 10.1186/1550-2783-11-12
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Int Soc Sports Nutr ISSN: 1550-2783 Impact factor: 5.150
The pre-race experience and training parameters (n = 49)
| Years as active biker (yr) | 9.2 ± 5.8 | 8.8 ± 5.9 |
| Number of finished ultra-marathons (n) | 8.0 ± 6.5 | 6.7 ± 5.3 |
| Personal best km in 24 hour (km) | 315.5 ± 89.7 | 279.6 ± 106.7 |
| Total hours weekly (h) | 10.5 ± 5.3 | 10.2 ± 5.5 |
| Weekly cycling kilometers (km) | 225.8 ± 149.5 | 191.8 ± 134.5 |
| Weekly cycling hours (h) | 9.9 ± 5.1 | 9.2 ± 5.2 |
| Mean cycling intensity (beat/min) | 133.8** ± 7.6 | 134.5** ± 22.8 |
| Mean cycling speed (km/h) | 23.0** ± 3.6 | 21.1** ± 5.3 |
| Longest trail (km) | 176.8** ± 84.7 | 141.7** ± 75.5 |
| Amount of km in 2011 (km) | 7,107.5 ± 5,782.4 | 5,696.9 ± 5,037.9 |
Results are presented as mean ± SD; * = P < 0.05, ** = P < 0.001.
Age and anthropometric characteristics of the ultra-MTBers (n = 49)
| | | | | |
| Body height (cm) | 180.4 ± 0.1 | | | |
| Age (yr) | 36.6 ± 8.4 | | | |
| Body mass (kg) | 77.9 ± 9.6 | 75.9 ± 9.8 | -2.0 ± 1.6** | -2.6 ± 2.1** |
| Skeletal muscle mass (kg) | 38.4 ± 4.9 | 38.1 ± 4.9 | -0.3 ± 1.1 | -0.6 ± 2.7 |
| Fat mass (kg) | 10.6 ± 5.3 | 9.2 ± 4.9 | -1.4 ± 1.2** | -14.9 ± 14.5** |
| Percent body fat (%) | 13.2 ± 5.7 | 11.8 ± 5.4 | -1.4 ± 1.4** | -12.7 ± 14.6** |
| Total body water (L) | 49.3 ± 5.5 | 48.9 ± 5.7 | -0.4 ± 1.4 | -0.9 ± 2.8 |
| Extracellular fluid (L) | 18.3 ± 2.0 | 18.1 ± 2.1 | -0.2 ± 0.6* | -1.2 ± 3.2* |
| Intracellular fluid (L) | 31.0 ± 3.5 | 30.8 ± 3.6 | -0.2 ± 0.8 | -0.7 ± 2.6 |
| Volume of the foot (L) | 1.132 ± 1.502 | 1.145 ± 1.302 | 0.013 ± 0.097 | 1.8 ± 9.6 |
| | | | | |
| Body height (cm) | 167.8 ± 29.3 | | | |
| Age (yr) | 36.8 ± 8.9 | | | |
| Body mass (kg) | 60.6 ± 4.9 | 59.7 ± 4.9 | -0.9 ± 1.2* | -1.5 ± 1.9* |
| Skeletal muscle mass (kg) | 26.7 ± 3.3 | 26.8 ± 3.2 | 0.1 ± 0.7 | 0.4 ± 2.7 |
| Fat mass (kg) | 10.9 ± 3.9 | 9.7 ± 3.9 | -1.2 ± 1.0** | -8.2 ± 10.8** |
| Percent body fat (%) | 15.4 ± 6.5 | 13.7 ± 6.2 | -2.7 ± 3.6* | -11.0 ± 15.5* |
| Total body water (L) | 35.3 ± 4.4 | 35.4 ± 4.5 | 0.1 ± 0.9 | 0.2 ± 2.7 |
| Extracellular fluid (L) | 13.3 ± 1.7 | 13.3 ± 1.7 | 0.0 ± 0.5 | 0.0 ± 3.6 |
| Intracellular fluid (L) | 22.0 ± 2.7 | 22.1 ± 2.8 | 0.1 ± 0.5 | 0.4 ± 2.3 |
| Volume of the foot (L) | 0.858 ± 1.205 | 0.908 ± 1.100 | 0.050 ± 0.116 | 6.9 ± 14.4 |
Results are presented as mean ± SD; * = P < 0.05, ** = P < 0.001.
Figure 1Absolute ranking related to %ΔBM and fluid intake in men (n = 37) and women (n = 12). Absolute ranking – according to the number of achieved kilometers during 24 hours, %ΔBM – percent change in body mass.
Haematological and urinary parameters (n = 25)
| | | | | |
| Haematocrit (%) | 43.1 ± 3.3 | 42.6 ± 3.1 | -0.5 ± 3.7 | -0.7 ± 8.8 |
| Plasma sodium (mmol/L) | 138.2 ± 1.4 | 137.8 ± 2.3 | -0.4 ± 2.9** | -0.3 ± 2.1 |
| Plasma urea (mmol/L) | 6.1 ± 1.3 | 13.5 ± 4.1 | 7.4 ± 3.8** | 124.0 ± 67.2 |
| Plasma osmolality (mosmol/kg H2O) | 289.4 ± 4.1 | 293.6 ± 4.4 | 4.2 ± 4.5** | 1.5 ± 1.6 |
| Urine urea (mmol/L) | 239.3 ± 172.1 | 576.0 ± 78.0 | 336.7 ± 174.8** | 298.0 ± 315.5 |
| Urine osmolality (mosmol/kg H2O) | 415.7 ± 190.3 | 776.7 ± 133.4 | 361.0 ± 184.4** | 132.0 ± 132.4 |
| Urine specific gravity (g/mL) | 1.013 ± 0.002 | 1.022 ± 0.004 | 0.009 ± 0.004** | 0.8 ± 0.3 |
| | | | | |
| Haematocrit (%) | 42.0 ± 2.7 | 40.0 ± 2.8 | -2.0 ± 4.1 | -4.5 ± 10.0 |
| Plasma sodium (mmol/L) | 137.4 ± 2.8 | 137.1 ± 1.8 | -0.3 ± 3.0 | -0.2 ± 2.2 |
| Plasma urea (mmol/L) | 5.8 ± 1.5 | 8.7 ± 2.5 | 2.9 ± 1.2** | 46.9 ± 18.5 |
| Plasma osmolality (mosmol/kg H2O) | 292.2 ± 2.8 | 290.6 ± 4.6 | -1.7 ± 4.3 | -0.6 ± 1.5 |
| Urine urea (mmol/L) | 290.5 ± 204.9 | 463.0 ± 172.5 | 172.5 ± 246.5 | 190.6 ± 292.3 |
| Urine osmolality (mosmol/kg H2O) | 724.3 ± 214.0 | 716,4 ± 329.1 | -7.9 ± 276.5 | -1.0 ± 36.6 |
| Urine specific gravity (g/mL) | 1.000 ± 0.005 | 1.001 ± 0.005 | 0.001 ± 0.005 | 0.1 ± 0.4 |
Results are presented as mean ± SD; * = P < 0.05, ** = P < 0.001.
Correlation matrix of PR BM, ΔBM, %ΔBM, PR FM, %ΔFM, %ΔECF and %Δ plasma urea for men (n = 37)
| PR BM | 0.20 | 0.33* | 0.63** | 0.17 | 0.35* | -0.10 |
| ΔBM | 0.99** | 0.19 | 0.30 | 0.88** | -0.44 | |
| %ΔBM | 0.53* | 0.33* | 0.83** | -0.50* | ||
| PR FM | 0.45** | 0.29 | -0.53* | |||
| %ΔFM | -0.05 | -0.31 | ||||
| %ΔEXW | -0.52* | |||||
| %ΔPU |
PR BM – post-race body mass, ΔBM – change in body mass, %ΔBM – percent change in body mass, PR FM – post-race body mass, %ΔFM – percent change in fat mass, %ΔECF – percent change in extracellular fluid, %Δ plasma urea – percent change in plasma urea. Output file contain both the Pearson’s r values and the scatter plot, one star (*) above the Pearson value represents significance level P < 0.05, two stars (**) P < 0.001.
The correlation matrix of ΔBM, %ΔBM and %ΔFM for women (n = 12)
| ΔBM | 0.99** | 0.35 |
| %ΔBM | 0.36 | |
| %ΔFM |
ΔBM – change in body mass, %ΔBM – percent change in body mass, %ΔFM – percent change in fat mass. Output file contain both the Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient and the scatter plot, one star (*) above the Spearman value represents significance level P < 0.05, two stars (**) P < 0.01.
Figure 2Percentage change of BM, FM, and SM in the 37 men and 12 women during the 24 hour MTB race. BM – body mass, FM – fat mass, SM – skeletal muscle mass.