Literature DB >> 6392815

Research progress in validation of clinical methods of assessing body composition.

M L Pollock, A S Jackson.   

Abstract

Anthropometry is the method of choice for estimating body composition in the clinical setting. The method can be accurate, and requires little time, space, equipment, or financial outlay. Although used extensively in epidemiological research, height/weight indices are not as accurate as skinfold and circumference measures for estimating body composition. The validity of estimating body density is enhanced by using a combination of skin-fold and circumference measures in a multiple-regression model. Some recently developed generalized equations may have a broader application for use in varied populations than several population-specific equations. The newer equations take into account the potential change in ratio of internal to external fat and bone density with age, and the nonlinear relationship between skinfold fat and body density. The validity of using skinfolds for estimating body density can be significantly affected by caliper selection and measurement procedures. Inter-observer errors appear to be the most problematic, with improper skinfold site selection causing the greatest variation among observers. To improve the validity of the anthropometric technique for use in the clinical setting, more precise standards and description of methods need to be developed.

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6392815

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc        ISSN: 0195-9131            Impact factor:   5.411


  16 in total

1.  Physiological factors to predict on traditional rowing performance.

Authors:  Mikel Izquierdo-Gabarren; Rafael González de Txabarri Expósito; Eduardo Sáez Sáez de Villarreal; Mikel Izquierdo
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2009-09-16       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  Educating chiropractic students about intraobserver and interobserver variability through the use of skinfold measurement.

Authors:  Marc P McRae
Journal:  J Chiropr Educ       Date:  2009

Review 3.  Techniques of measurement of body composition. Part II.

Authors:  D A Brodie
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 11.136

4.  The role of fat mass index in determining obesity.

Authors:  Gerson Peltz; Maria Teresa Aguirre; Maureen Sanderson; Mary K Fadden
Journal:  Am J Hum Biol       Date:  2010 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.937

5.  Modulatory Effect of Inflammation on Blood Pressure Reduction via Therapeutic Lifestyle Change.

Authors:  Richard V Milani; Carl J Lavie
Journal:  Ochsner J       Date:  2009

6.  Does peak oxygen pulse complement peak oxygen uptake in risk stratifying patients with heart failure?

Authors:  Ricardo B Oliveira; Jonathan Myers; Claudio Gil S Araújo; Ross Arena; Sandra Mandic; Daniel Bensimhon; Joshua Abella; Paul Chase; Marco Guazzi; Peter Brubaker; Brian Moore; Dalane Kitzman; Mary Ann Peberdy
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2009-06-18       Impact factor: 2.778

Review 7.  Body fat assessment in women. Special considerations.

Authors:  J A Vogel; K E Friedl
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 11.136

8.  A Skinfold Model to Predict Fat-Free Mass in Female Athletes.

Authors:  Evelyn R Warner; Willa C Fornetti; Jennifer J Jallo; James M Pivarnik
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 2.860

9.  Creatine supplementation improves muscular performance in older women.

Authors:  Lincoln A Gotshalk; William J Kraemer; Mario A G Mendonca; Jakob L Vingren; Anne M Kenny; Barry A Spiering; Disa L Hatfield; Maren S Fragala; Jeff S Volek
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2007-10-18       Impact factor: 3.078

10.  Resistance training decreases 24-hour blood pressure in women with metabolic syndrome.

Authors:  Ramires Alsamir Tibana; Guilherme Borges Pereira; Jéssica Cardoso de Souza; Vitor Tajra; Denis Cesar Leite Vieira; Carmen Silvia Grubert Campbell; Claudia Regina Cavaglieri; Jonato Prestes
Journal:  Diabetol Metab Syndr       Date:  2013-05-27       Impact factor: 3.320

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.