Literature DB >> 34055165

Comparison of the Three-Site and Seven-Site Measurements in Female Collegiate Athletes Using BodyMetrix™.

Amanda M Elsey1, Alister K Lowe1, Ashley N Cornell1, Paul N Whitehead1, Ryan T Conners1.   

Abstract

One method to measure body composition that is gaining popularity is the BodyMetrix™, which uses A-mode ultrasound. A-mode ultrasound, when used with the BodyMetrix™, has been found to be a reliable and a cost-effective tool for measuring overall body fat percentage. Furthermore, the portability and short duration testing features of the BodyMetrix™, allows for testing of a large group of athletes inside or outside of a clinical setting. Despite these advantages, research regarding the BodyMetrix™ is limited and has primarily focused on the seven-site testing technique. However, the three-site technique allows for faster testing and a reduction of time needed to test an entire team or multiple sports teams. Thus, the purpose of this study was to compare the three-site and seven-site methods using the BodyMetrix™ to determine body fat percentage in female collegiate athletes. It was hypothesized that body fat percentage determined via the seven-site method would be different from those obtained by three-site measurement technique. Study participants included 40 National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) Division-II female athletes from volleyball, soccer, and softball teams. The Jackson Pollock three-site (thigh, suprailiac, triceps) and seven-site (thigh, suprailiac, triceps, abdominal, subscapular, chest, and axilla) equations were used to determine body fat percentage values. The time required to perform the three-site and seven-site measurements were also recorded. A paired samples t-test was used to assess if there was a difference between the three-site and the seven-site body fat percentage measurements with the use of the BodyMetrix™ . The three-site method (23.21 ± 3.61) was significantly lower (p < 0.001) compared to the seven- site method (25.75 ± 4.39). On average, the three-site technique took 2 minutes and 13 seconds less than the seven-site technique.

Entities:  

Keywords:  A-mode ultrasound; Jackson Pollock equation; body composition; female athlete

Year:  2021        PMID: 34055165      PMCID: PMC8136548     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Exerc Sci        ISSN: 1939-795X


  15 in total

Review 1.  Techniques of body composition assessment: a review of laboratory and field methods.

Authors:  D R Wagner; V H Heyward
Journal:  Res Q Exerc Sport       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 2.500

2.  Reliability and validity of body composition measures in female athletes.

Authors:  W C Fornetti; J M Pivarnik; J M Foley; J J Fiechtner
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  1999-09

3.  How to minimise the health risks to athletes who compete in weight-sensitive sports review and position statement on behalf of the Ad Hoc Research Working Group on Body Composition, Health and Performance, under the auspices of the IOC Medical Commission.

Authors:  Jorunn Sundgot-Borgen; Nanna L Meyer; Timothy G Lohman; Timothy R Ackland; Ronald J Maughan; Arthur D Stewart; Wolfram Müller
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 13.800

Review 4.  The female triad. Eating disorders, amenorrhea, and osteoporosis.

Authors:  M Putukian
Journal:  Med Clin North Am       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 5.456

Review 5.  The female athlete triad. The inter-relatedness of disordered eating, amenorrhea, and osteoporosis.

Authors:  A Nattiv; R Agostini; B Drinkwater; K K Yeager
Journal:  Clin Sports Med       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 2.182

6.  Subcutaneous thigh fat assessment: a comparison of skinfold calipers and ultrasound imaging.

Authors:  Noelle M Selkow; Brian G Pietrosimone; Susan A Saliba
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2011 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.860

7.  Estimation of body fat in adults using a portable A-mode ultrasound.

Authors:  Renata M Bielemann; Maria Cristina Gonzalez; Thiago Gonzalez Barbosa-Silva; Silvana Paiva Orlandi; Mariana Otero Xavier; Rafaela Bülow Bergmann; Maria Cecília Formoso Assunção
Journal:  Nutrition       Date:  2015-10-30       Impact factor: 4.008

Review 8.  Ultrasound as a tool to assess body fat.

Authors:  Dale R Wagner
Journal:  J Obes       Date:  2013-08-26

9.  Validity and Reliability of A-Mode Ultrasound for Body Composition Assessment of NCAA Division I Athletes.

Authors:  Dale R Wagner; Dustin L Cain; Nicolas W Clark
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-04-13       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Body composition techniques.

Authors:  Rebecca Kuriyan
Journal:  Indian J Med Res       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 2.375

View more
  1 in total

1.  Assessment of Body Fat Percentage Using B-Mode Ultrasound Technique versus Skinfold Caliper in Obese Healthy Volunteers.

Authors:  Avinash S Ingle; Nitin Kumar Kashyap; Soumitra Trivedi; Rajeev Choudhary; Gaurav Suryavanshi; Pugazhenthan Thangaraju; Kiran R Bagale
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-03-09
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.