OBJECTIVE: To investigate patients' strength of preferences for attributes associated with modernising delivery of out of hours emergency care services in Nottingham. METHODS: A discrete choice experiment was applied to quantify preferences for key attributes of out of hours emergency care. The attributes reflected the findings of previous research, current policy initiatives, and discussions with local key stakeholders. A self complete questionnaire was administered to NHS Direct callers and adults attending accident and emergency, GP services and NHS walk-in centre. Regression analysis was used to estimate the relative importance of the different attributes. RESULTS: Response was 74% (n = 457) although 61% (n = 378) were useable. All attributes were statistically significant. Being consulted by a doctor was the most important attribute. This was followed by being consulted by a nurse, being kept informed about waiting time, and quality of the consultation. Respondents were prepared to wait an extra 2 hours 20 minutes to be consulted by a doctor. There were no measurable preference differences between patients surveyed at different NHS entry points. Younger respondents preferred single telephone call access to health care out of hours. Although having services provided close to home and making contact in person were generally preferred, they were less important than others, suggesting that a range of service locations may be acceptable to patients. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that local solutions for reforming emergency out of hours care should take account of the strength of patient preferences. The method was acceptable and the results have directly informed the development of a local service framework for emergency care.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate patients' strength of preferences for attributes associated with modernising delivery of out of hours emergency care services in Nottingham. METHODS: A discrete choice experiment was applied to quantify preferences for key attributes of out of hours emergency care. The attributes reflected the findings of previous research, current policy initiatives, and discussions with local key stakeholders. A self complete questionnaire was administered to NHS Direct callers and adults attending accident and emergency, GP services and NHS walk-in centre. Regression analysis was used to estimate the relative importance of the different attributes. RESULTS: Response was 74% (n = 457) although 61% (n = 378) were useable. All attributes were statistically significant. Being consulted by a doctor was the most important attribute. This was followed by being consulted by a nurse, being kept informed about waiting time, and quality of the consultation. Respondents were prepared to wait an extra 2 hours 20 minutes to be consulted by a doctor. There were no measurable preference differences between patients surveyed at different NHS entry points. Younger respondents preferred single telephone call access to health care out of hours. Although having services provided close to home and making contact in person were generally preferred, they were less important than others, suggesting that a range of service locations may be acceptable to patients. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that local solutions for reforming emergency out of hours care should take account of the strength of patient preferences. The method was acceptable and the results have directly informed the development of a local service framework for emergency care.
Authors: V Lattimer; S Brailsford; J Turnbull; P Tarnaras; H Smith; S George; K Gerard; S Maslin-Prothero Journal: Emerg Med J Date: 2004-11 Impact factor: 2.740
Authors: Karen Gerard; Val Lattimer; Heidi Surridge; Steve George; Joanne Turnbull; Abigail Burgess; Judith Lathlean; Helen Smith Journal: Health Expect Date: 2006-03 Impact factor: 3.377
Authors: Hilde Philips; Roy Remmen; Paul Van Royen; Marc Teblick; Leo Geudens; Marc Bronckaers; Herman Meeuwis Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2010-07-30 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Paul Harris; Jennifer A Whitty; Elizabeth Kendall; Julie Ratcliffe; Andrew Wilson; Peter Littlejohns; Paul A Scuffham Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2015-04-03 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Alfredo Manuli; Maria Grazia Maggio; Mariacristina De Cola; Daniele Tripoli; Rosaria De Luca; Rocco Salvatore Calabrò Journal: J Family Med Prim Care Date: 2019-11-15