Literature DB >> 11184957

Quantifying patient preferences for out-of-hours primary care.

A Morgan1, P Shackley, M Pickin, J Brazier.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To quantify public preferences for different attributes of out-of-hours primary medical care.
METHODS: This study applies a technique called conjoint analysis. A focus group was convened to identify the most important attributes for inclusion in the study, followed by a postal questionnaire asking people to choose between hypothetical services containing different mixes of these attributes. Multi-variate regression analysis estimated the relative importance of different attributes to respondents. The respondents were 436 adults who were among respondents to an earlier postal survey of 25,090 randomly selected Sheffield residents.
RESULTS: The doctor's manner (whether the doctor takes time to listen), the type of consultation (whether the patient receives a home visit, telephone advice, sees an accident and emergency doctor or attends a primary care treatment centre) and waiting time for consultation best predicted the public's preferences for out-of-hours care. Another three attributes--ease of access; seeing a familiar doctor; and the doctor's shift arrangements--were not statistically significant.
CONCLUSIONS: By asking people to make simple choices between hypothetical services, it is possible to quantify their strength of preference for different aspects of a service. This has important implications for the planning of services. Specifically, for out-of-hours services, more consideration should be given to the doctor's manner and waiting times rather than familiarity of doctor.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11184957     DOI: 10.1177/135581960000500405

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Health Serv Res Policy        ISSN: 1355-8196


  16 in total

1.  Discrete choice experiments in health economics. For better or for worse?

Authors:  Stirling Bryan; Paul Dolan
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2004-10

2.  Using conjoint analysis to model the preferences of different patient segments for attributes of patient-centered care.

Authors:  Charles E Cunningham; Ken Deal; Heather Rimas; Heather Campbell; Ann Russell; Jennifer Henderson; Anne Matheson; Blake Melnick
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2008-12-01       Impact factor: 3.883

3.  Counting the cost of fast access: using discrete choice experiments to elicit preferences in general practice.

Authors:  Mandy Ryan; Verity Watson
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 5.386

4.  The introduction of integrated out-of-hours arrangements in England: a discrete choice experiment of public preferences for alternative models of care.

Authors:  Karen Gerard; Val Lattimer; Heidi Surridge; Steve George; Joanne Turnbull; Abigail Burgess; Judith Lathlean; Helen Smith
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 3.377

5.  Chronic pain patients' treatment preferences: a discrete-choice experiment.

Authors:  Axel C Mühlbacher; Uwe Junker; Christin Juhnke; Edgar Stemmler; Thomas Kohlmann; Friedhelm Leverkus; Matthias Nübling
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2014-06-21

6.  Preferences for Surveillance of Barrett's Oesophagus: a Discrete Choice Experiment.

Authors:  Norma B Bulamu; Gang Chen; Tim Bright; Julie Ratcliffe; Adrian Chung; Robert J L Fraser; Björn Törnqvist; David I Watson
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2018-11-26       Impact factor: 3.452

7.  Rationing in the emergency department: the good, the bad, and the unacceptable.

Authors:  E Cross; S Goodacre; A O'Cathain; J Arnold
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 2.740

Review 8.  Patient satisfaction in emergency medicine.

Authors:  C Taylor; J R Benger
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 2.740

9.  Conducting discrete choice experiments to inform healthcare decision making: a user's guide.

Authors:  Emily Lancsar; Jordan Louviere
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 4.981

10.  What patients want from primary care consultations: a discrete choice experiment to identify patients' priorities.

Authors:  Sudeh Cheraghi-Sohi; Arne Risa Hole; Nicola Mead; Ruth McDonald; Diane Whalley; Peter Bower; Martin Roland
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2008 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.166

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.