Literature DB >> 11777867

The effect of a separate stream for minor injuries on accident and emergency department waiting times.

M W Cooke1, S Wilson, S Pearson.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: To decrease waiting times within accident and emergency (A&E) departments, various initiatives have been suggested including the use of a separate stream of care for minor injuries ("fast track"). This study aimed to assess whether a separate stream of minor injuries care in a UK A&E department decreases the waiting time, without delaying the care of those with more serious injury. INTERVENTION: A doctor saw any ambulant patients with injuries not requiring an examination couch or an urgent intervention. Any patients requiring further treatment were returned to the sub-wait area until a nurse could see them in another cubicle.
METHOD: Data were retrospectively extracted from the routine hospital information systems for all patients attending the A&E department for five weeks before the institution of the separate stream system and for five weeks after.
RESULTS: 13 918 new patients were seen during the 10 week study period; 7117 (51.1%) in the first five week period and 6801 (49.9%) in the second five week period when a separate stream was operational. Recorded time to see a doctor ranged from 0-850 minutes. Comparison of the two five week periods demonstrated that the proportion of patients waiting less than 30 and less than 60 minutes both improved (p<0.0001). The relative risk of waiting more than one hour decreased by 32%. The improvements in waiting times were not at the expense of patients with more urgent needs.
CONCLUSIONS: The introduction of a separate stream for minor injuries can produce an improvement in the number of trauma patients waiting over an hour of about 30%. If this is associated with an increase in consultant presence on the shop floor it may be possible to achieve a 50% improvement. It is recommended that departments use a separate stream for minor injuries to decrease the number of patients enduring long waits in A&amp;E departments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11777867      PMCID: PMC1725754          DOI: 10.1136/emj.19.1.28

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Emerg Med J        ISSN: 1472-0205            Impact factor:   2.740


  8 in total

1.  "Fast track" admission for acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  K Ranjadayalan; V Umachandran; A D Timmis
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1992-02-08

2.  "Fast tracking" patients with a proximal femoral fracture.

Authors:  J Ryan; M Ghani; P Staniforth; G Bryant; S Edwards
Journal:  J Accid Emerg Med       Date:  1996-03

3.  A review of 7 years of complaints in an inner-city accident and emergency department.

Authors:  M T Hunt; M E Glucksman
Journal:  Arch Emerg Med       Date:  1991-03

4.  Waiting time in an urban accident and emergency department--a way to improve it.

Authors:  F L Lau; K P Leung
Journal:  J Accid Emerg Med       Date:  1997-09

5.  Fast Track: urgent care within a teaching hospital emergency department: can it work?

Authors:  H W Meislin; S A Coates; J Cyr; T Valenzuela
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 5.721

6.  Care of minor injuries by emergency nurse practitioners or junior doctors: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  M Sakr; J Angus; J Perrin; C Nixon; J Nicholl; J Wardrope
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1999-10-16       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Fast track and the pediatric emergency department: resource utilization and patients outcomes.

Authors:  L C Hampers; S Cha; D J Gutglass; H J Binns; S E Krug
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 3.451

8.  Complaints and compliments in the pediatric emergency department.

Authors:  J Burstein; G R Fleisher
Journal:  Pediatr Emerg Care       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 1.454

  8 in total
  34 in total

1.  Can additional experienced staff reduce emergency medical admissions?

Authors:  S Goodacre; S Mason; R Kersh; A Webster; N Samaniego; F Morris
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 2.740

2.  Emergency pyramid is inverting already.

Authors:  Matthew Cooke; Karen Castille
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-01-04

3.  One size does not fit all. View 2.

Authors:  K Castille; M Cooke
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 2.740

4.  Team triage improves emergency department efficiency.

Authors:  F Subash; F Dunn; B McNicholl; J Marlow
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 2.740

5.  Has the assessment of isolated ankle injuries altered since 1993?

Authors:  T Locker; M Tryfonidis; S Mason
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 2.740

6.  Targets and moving goal posts: changes in waiting times in a UK emergency department.

Authors:  T Locker; S Mason; J Wardrope; S Walters
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 2.740

7.  Factors that affect the flow of patients through triage.

Authors:  Melinda Lyons; Ruth Brown; Robert Wears
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 2.740

8.  The "4-hour target": emergency nurses' views.

Authors:  Andy Mortimore; Simon Cooper
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 2.740

9.  Use of out of hours services: a comparison between two organisations.

Authors:  C J T van Uden; R A G Winkens; G J Wesseling; H F J M Crebolder; C P van Schayck
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 2.740

10.  The impact of a fast track area on quality and effectiveness outcomes: a Middle Eastern emergency department perspective.

Authors:  Subashnie Devkaran; Howard Parsons; Murray Van Dyke; Jonathan Drennan; Jaishen Rajah
Journal:  BMC Emerg Med       Date:  2009-06-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.