Literature DB >> 15486215

Moderate versus high concentration of contrast material for aortic and hepatic enhancement and tumor-to-liver contrast at multi-detector row CT.

Kazuo Awai1, Masaaki Inoue, Yukinobu Yagyu, Manabu Watanabe, Toshiko Sano, Seiun Nin, Ryuta Koike, Yasumasa Nishimura, Yasuyuki Yamashita.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To prospectively evaluate aortic and hepatic enhancement and depiction of hypervascular hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) between two contrast materials with moderate and high iodine concentrations when administered at same iodine dose and injection duration at multi-detector row helical computed tomography (CT).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Institutional review board approval and informed patient consent were obtained. One hundred eighty-six patients were studied, and 67 patients with hypervascular HCC were identified. Ninety-four patients were assigned to receive iohexol 350 (mg iodine per milliliter) with protocol A; 92, iohexol 300 with protocol B. In both protocols, iohexol with same iodine load per weight (518 mg/kg) was administered with same injection duration (25 seconds). Multiphase CT scanning was started 10, 20, 50, and 180 seconds after the trigger (threshold level set at increase of 100 HU over baseline CT number of aorta). Enhancement of aorta and liver was measured in 186 patients. Tumor-to-liver contrast was measured in 67 patients with hypervascular HCC. Statistical analysis was performed with Mann-Whitney U test.
RESULTS: Medians of aortic enhancement during four phases were 325, 185, 112, and 69 HU with protocol A. Corresponding values were 344, 266, 121, and 73 HU with protocol B. During all phases, aortic enhancement was significantly higher with protocol B (P = .046, P < .001, P < .001, and P = .002). Hepatic enhancement during four phases was 6, 21, 48, and 34 HU with protocol A. Corresponding values were 3, 17, 47, and 35 HU with protocol B. Hepatic enhancement was significantly higher with protocol A during first and second phases (P < .001 for both), although there was no significant difference between protocols during third and fourth phases (P = .778 and P = .178, respectively). Medians of tumor-to-liver contrast during four phases were 22, 34, 0.5, and -1.1 HU with protocol A. Corresponding values were 23, 45, 0, and -8.6 HU with protocol B. Tumor-to-liver contrast was significantly higher with protocol B during second phase (P = .049), although there was no difference between protocols during other phases.
CONCLUSION: When total iodine dose was adjusted to body weight and injection duration was fixed, rapid administration of moderate concentration of contrast material was more effective for depiction of hypervascular HCC than was high concentration of contrast material. (c) RSNA, 2004.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15486215     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2333031617

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  22 in total

1.  Optimizing scan timing of hepatic arterial phase by physiologic pharmacokinetic analysis in bolus-tracking technique by multi-detector row computed tomography.

Authors:  Isao Yamaguchi; Eiji Kidoya; Masayuki Suzuki; Hirohiko Kimura
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2010-09-25

2.  Prediction of aortic peak enhancement in monophasic contrast injection protocols at multidetector CT: phantom and patient studies.

Authors:  Kazuo Awai; Yoshiharu Nakayama; Takeshi Nakaura; Yumi Yanaga; Yoshitaka Tamura; Masahiro Hatemura; Yoshinori Funama; Yasuyuki Yamashita
Journal:  Radiat Med       Date:  2007-01-25

3.  Effect of varying contrast material iodine concentration and injection technique on the conspicuity of hepatocellular carcinoma during 64-section MDCT of patients with cirrhosis.

Authors:  A Guerrisi; D Marin; R C Nelson; G De Filippis; M Di Martino; H Barnhart; R Masciangelo; I Guerrisi; R Passariello; C Catalano
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Contrast enhancement in multidetector-row computed tomography (MDCT) of the abdomen: intraindividual comparison of contrast media containing 300 mg versus 370 mg iodine per ml.

Authors:  F F Behrendt; A H Mahnken; S Keil; M Das; C Hohl; D Bauer; P Seidensticker; E Jost; J E Wildberger; R W Günther; G Mühlenbruch
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-01-29       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Increasing contrast agent concentration improves enhancement in first-pass CT perfusion.

Authors:  H M Silvennoinen; L M Hamberg; L Valanne; G J Hunter
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 3.825

6.  Operation of bolus tracking system for prediction of aortic peak enhancement at multidetector row computed tomography: pharmacokinetic analysis and clinical study.

Authors:  Isao Yamaguchi; Hiroyuki Hayashi; Masayuki Suzuki; Katsuhiro Ichikawa; Eiji Kidoya; Hirohiko Kimura
Journal:  Radiat Med       Date:  2008-07-27

7.  MDCT angiography of the pulmonary arteries: intravascular contrast enhancement does not depend on iodine concentration when injecting equal amounts of iodine at standardized iodine delivery rates.

Authors:  S Keil; C Plumhans; F F Behrendt; M Das; S Stanzel; G Mühlenbruch; P Seidensticker; C Knackstedt; A H Mahnken; R W Günther; J E Wildberger
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-04-08       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Intra-individual comparison of different contrast media concentrations (300 mg, 370 mg and 400 mg iodine) in MDCT.

Authors:  Florian F Behrendt; Hubertus Pietsch; Gregor Jost; Martin A Sieber; Sebastian Keil; Cedric Plumhans; Peter Seidensticker; Rolf W Günther; Andreas H Mahnken
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-02-24       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Biphasic contrast medium injection in cardiac CT: moderate versus high concentration contrast material at identical iodine flux and iodine dose.

Authors:  Annemarieke Rutten; Matthijs F L Meijs; Alexander M de Vos; Peter R Seidensticker; Mathias Prokop
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-03-20       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  64-Slice CT angiography of the abdominal aorta and abdominal arteries: comparison of the diagnostic efficacy of iobitridol 350 mgI/ml versus iomeprol 400 mgI/ml in a prospective, randomised, double-blind multi-centre trial.

Authors:  Christian Loewe; Christoph R Becker; Riccardo Berletti; Carlo Alberto Cametti; Jerome Caudron; Walter Coudyzer; Johan De Mey; Massimo Favat; Jean-François Heautot; Sam Heye; Markus Hittinger; Antoine Larralde; Jean-Pierre Lestrat; Roberto Marangoni; Koenraad Nieboer; Peter Reimer; Martin Schwarz; Melanie Schernthaner; Johannes Lammer
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-09-30       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.