Literature DB >> 15477434

Talking with terminally ill patients and their caregivers about death, dying, and bereavement: is it stressful? Is it helpful?

Ezekiel J Emanuel1, Diane L Fairclough, Pam Wolfe, Linda L Emanuel.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Discussing end-of-life issues with terminally ill patients is often considered distressing and harmful. This study was conducted to assess whether interviewing terminally ill patients and their caregivers about death, dying, and bereavement is stressful and/or helpful.
METHODS: Patients from 6 sites in the United States who were estimated to have 6 months or less to live were interviewed in person and reinterviewed 2 to 6 months later. Their caregivers were interviewed separately. At the end of the interviews, patients and caregivers were asked how stressful and how helpful the interview had been. Of 1131 eligible patients, 988 (87.4%) were interviewed, and of 915 eligible caregivers, 893 (97.6%) were interviewed.
RESULTS: At the end of the first interview, 1.9% of the patients reported having experienced a great deal of stress, 7.1% some stress, and 88.7% little or no stress from the interview. Among the caregivers, 1.5% reported a great deal of stress, 8.4% some stress, and 89.7% little or no stress. Slightly more stress was reported to have been caused by the reinterview. Overall, 16.9% of the patients reported the initial interview as very helpful, 29.6% as somewhat helpful, and 49.6% as offering little or no help. Among the caregivers, 19.1% reported the initial interview as very helpful, 34.3% as somewhat helpful, and 44.9% as offering little or no help. The reported helpfulness of the second interview was slightly less. Patients experiencing pain (odds ratio [OR], 1.26; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.02-1.56), more personal meaning in dying (OR, 3.05; 95% CI, 2.02-4.59), and less ease with talking about the end of life (OR, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.09-1.60) were significantly more likely to report stress. Patients who were from an ethnic minority (OR, 1.85; 95% CI, 1.31-2.63), anxious about the end of their life (OR, 1.39; 95% CI 1.16-1.67), more spiritual (OR, 1.30; 95% CI, 1.06-1.61), and serene (OR, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.08-1.45) were significantly more likely to report the interview helpful. There was no relationship between stress and helpfulness.
CONCLUSIONS: Terminally ill patients and their caregivers can discuss death, dying, and bereavement in a structured interview with minimal stress and report that the interview was helpful. Institutional review boards should not preemptively restrict surveys with terminally ill patients without reliable evidence that they will be stressful or otherwise harmful.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Death and Euthanasia; Empirical Approach

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15477434     DOI: 10.1001/archinte.164.18.1999

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-9926


  39 in total

1.  Is Participating in Psychological Research a Benefit, Burden, or Both for Medically Ill Youth and Their Caregivers?.

Authors:  Lori Wiener; Haven Battles; Sima Zadeh; Maryland Pao
Journal:  IRB       Date:  2015 Nov-Dec

2.  Conducting research interviews with bereaved family carers: when do we ask?

Authors:  Brenda Bentley; Moira O'Connor
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2014-12-17       Impact factor: 2.947

3.  Conducting reproductive research during a new childhood cancer diagnosis: ethical considerations and impact on participants.

Authors:  Leena Nahata; Taylor L Morgan; Keagan G Lipak; Olivia E Clark; Nicholas D Yeager; Sarah H O'Brien; Stacy Whiteside; Anthony N Audino; Cynthia A Gerhardt; Gwendolyn P Quinn
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  Perceptions of Response Burden Associated with Completion of Patient-Reported Outcome Assessments in Oncology.

Authors:  Thomas M Atkinson; Carolyn E Schwartz; Leah Goldstein; Iliana Garcia; Daniel F Storfer; Yuelin Li; Jie Zhang; Bernard H Bochner; Bruce D Rapkin
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2018-08-31       Impact factor: 5.725

5.  Advance medical directives: a proposed new approach and terminology from an Islamic perspective.

Authors:  Hamdan Al-Jahdali; Salim Baharoon; Abdullah Al Sayyari; Ghiath Al-Ahmad
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2013-05

6.  Toward a conceptual reexamination of the patient-physician relationship in the healthcare institution for the new millennium.

Authors:  Marcel Fredericks; Jeff A Odiet; Steven I Miller; Janet Fredericks
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 1.798

7.  Perceptions of participating in family-centered fertility research among adolescent and young adult males newly diagnosed with cancer: A qualitative study.

Authors:  Leena Nahata; Taylor L Morgan; Keagan G Lipak; Olivia E Clark; Nicholas D Yeager; Sarah H O'Brien; Stacy Whiteside; Anthony Audino; Gwendolyn P Quinn; Cynthia A Gerhardt
Journal:  Pediatr Blood Cancer       Date:  2019-08-12       Impact factor: 3.167

8.  Burden and benefit of psychosocial research at the end of life.

Authors:  Hayley Pessin; Michele Galietta; Christian J Nelson; Robert Brescia; Barry Rosenfeld; William Breitbart
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 2.947

9.  Communication with relatives and collusion in palliative care: a cross-cultural perspective.

Authors:  Santosh K Chaturvedi; Carmen G Loiselle; Prabha S Chandra
Journal:  Indian J Palliat Care       Date:  2009-01

10.  When silence is not golden: Engaging adolescents and young adults in discussions around end-of-life care choices.

Authors:  Lori Wiener; Sima Zadeh; Leonard H Wexler; Maryland Pao
Journal:  Pediatr Blood Cancer       Date:  2013-03-11       Impact factor: 3.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.