Literature DB >> 18454616

Burden and benefit of psychosocial research at the end of life.

Hayley Pessin1, Michele Galietta, Christian J Nelson, Robert Brescia, Barry Rosenfeld, William Breitbart.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The impact of psychosocial research participation has not been examined systematically in palliative care settings. Concerns are often raised regarding the potential for distress among terminally ill patients. This is particularly true when death and dying are the focus of research. Therefore, it is important to understand the specific ways psychosocial research could potentially harm or be helpful to participants.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the burden and benefits of participation in psychosocial research addressing end-of-life issues among patients receiving inpatient palliative care.
DESIGN: Sixty-eight terminally ill patients with cancer who had an average life expectancy of less than 2 months, were administered a brief self-report questionnaire to assess whether participation in psychosocial research was burdensome and/or beneficial. The specific factors that contributed to their perceptions were also identified.
RESULTS: The majority of patients reported no burden associated with participation (75%) and found the experience as moderately to highly beneficial (68%). Factors most frequently identified as burdensome included the length of the interview (21%), structure of the questionnaires (18%), and difficulty discussing end-of life issues (12%). Although some patients reported some distress while discussing end-of-life issues (19%), few endorsed a high level of distress (6%). Factors most frequently identified as beneficial were the social interaction (75%), sense of contributing to society (57%), and the opportunity to discuss their illness (47%).
CONCLUSIONS: Participants in psychosocial end-of-life research are unlikely to experience significant burden from participation and, in fact, may benefit.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18454616      PMCID: PMC3717570          DOI: 10.1089/jpm.2007.9923

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Palliat Med        ISSN: 1557-7740            Impact factor:   2.947


  21 in total

1.  Commentary: looking beyond vulnerability: the ethics and science of research involving dying patients.

Authors:  D Casarett
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 3.612

2.  "Mini-mental state". A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician.

Authors:  M F Folstein; S E Folstein; P R McHugh
Journal:  J Psychiatr Res       Date:  1975-11       Impact factor: 4.791

Review 3.  Ethical challenges of palliative care research.

Authors:  David J Casarett; Ann Knebel; Karin Helmers
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 3.612

4.  Research in palliative care populations: ethical issues.

Authors:  L J Kristjanson; E J Hanson; L Balneaves
Journal:  J Palliat Care       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 2.250

5.  Ethical issues in palliative care research revisited.

Authors:  B M Mount; R Cohen; N MacDonald; E Bruera; D J Dudgeon
Journal:  Palliat Med       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 4.762

6.  The quality of dying: how can we improve care at the end of life? An interview with the IOM's Marilyn Field. Interview by Steven Berman.

Authors:  M J Field
Journal:  Jt Comm J Qual Improv       Date:  1997-09

7.  Distress reduction during the structured clinical interview for DSM-III-R.

Authors:  P A Scarvalone; M Cloitre; L A Spielman; L Jacobsberg; B Fishman; S W Perry
Journal:  Psychiatry Res       Date:  1996-01-31       Impact factor: 3.222

Review 8.  Ethical issues in the conduct of research in long term care.

Authors:  C K Cassel
Journal:  Gerontologist       Date:  1988-06

9.  Talking with terminally ill patients and their caregivers about death, dying, and bereavement: is it stressful? Is it helpful?

Authors:  Ezekiel J Emanuel; Diane L Fairclough; Pam Wolfe; Linda L Emanuel
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2004-10-11

10.  Ethical issues in palliative care research.

Authors:  E Bruera
Journal:  J Palliat Care       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 2.250

View more
  28 in total

1.  An exploratory survey of end-of-life attitudes, beliefs, and experiences of adolescents with HIV/AIDS and their families.

Authors:  Patricia A Garvie; Jianping He; Jichuan Wang; Lawrence J D'Angelo; Maureen E Lyon
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2012-07-07       Impact factor: 3.612

2.  Is Participating in Psychological Research a Benefit, Burden, or Both for Medically Ill Youth and Their Caregivers?.

Authors:  Lori Wiener; Haven Battles; Sima Zadeh; Maryland Pao
Journal:  IRB       Date:  2015 Nov-Dec

3.  Factors associated with attrition from a randomized controlled trial of meaning-centered group psychotherapy for patients with advanced cancer.

Authors:  Allison J Applebaum; Wendy G Lichtenthal; Hayley A Pessin; Julia N Radomski; N Simay Gökbayrak; Aviva M Katz; Barry Rosenfeld; William Breitbart
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2011-07-12       Impact factor: 3.894

Review 4.  Ethical challenges and solutions regarding delirium studies in palliative care.

Authors:  Lisa Sweet; Dimitrios Adamis; David J Meagher; Daniel Davis; David C Currow; Shirley H Bush; Christopher Barnes; Michael Hartwick; Meera Agar; Jessica Simon; William Breitbart; Neil MacDonald; Peter G Lawlor
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2013-12-31       Impact factor: 3.612

5.  Psychosocial care for patients and their families is integral to supportive care in cancer: MASCC position statement.

Authors:  Antonella Surbone; Lea Baider; Tammy S Weitzman; Mary Jacqueline Brames; Cynthia N Rittenberg; Judith Johnson
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2009-07-17       Impact factor: 3.603

6.  Conducting reproductive research during a new childhood cancer diagnosis: ethical considerations and impact on participants.

Authors:  Leena Nahata; Taylor L Morgan; Keagan G Lipak; Olivia E Clark; Nicholas D Yeager; Sarah H O'Brien; Stacy Whiteside; Anthony N Audino; Cynthia A Gerhardt; Gwendolyn P Quinn
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 3.412

7.  The Benefits and Burdens of Pediatric Palliative Care and End-of-Life Research: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Meaghann S Weaver; Kim Mooney-Doyle; Katherine Patterson Kelly; Kathleen Montgomery; Amy R Newman; Christine A Fortney; Cynthia J Bell; Jessica L Spruit; Melissa Kurtz Uveges; Lori Wiener; Cynthia M Schmidt; Vanessa N Madrigal; Pamela S Hinds
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2019-03-05       Impact factor: 2.947

8.  Evaluation of the burdens and benefits of participation in research by parents of children with life-limiting illnesses.

Authors:  Audrey Hopper; Stacey Crane
Journal:  Nurse Res       Date:  2019-07-18

9.  Participation in Online Research Examining End-of-Life Experiences: Is It Beneficial, Burdensome, or Both for Parents Bereaved by Childhood Cancer?

Authors:  Julia Tager; Haven Battles; Sima Zadeh Bedoya; Cynthia A Gerhardt; Tammi Young-Saleme; Lori Wiener
Journal:  J Pediatr Oncol Nurs       Date:  2019 May/Jun       Impact factor: 1.636

10.  Development and preliminary evaluation of a training workshop for the collection of patient-reported outcome (PRO) interview data by research support staff.

Authors:  Thomas M Atkinson; Karen Hurley; Carma L Bylund; Alexandra Berk; Kimberly Diminni; Jamie S Ostroff
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 2.037

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.