Leena Nahata1,2,3, Taylor L Morgan4, Keagan G Lipak4, Olivia E Clark4, Nicholas D Yeager5,6, Sarah H O'Brien5,6,7, Stacy Whiteside6, Anthony N Audino5,6, Cynthia A Gerhardt4,5, Gwendolyn P Quinn8. 1. Center for Biobehavioral Health, Abigail Wexner Research Institute, Columbus, OH, USA. leena.nahata@nationwidechildrens.org. 2. Division of Endocrinology, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH, USA. leena.nahata@nationwidechildrens.org. 3. The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, USA. leena.nahata@nationwidechildrens.org. 4. Center for Biobehavioral Health, Abigail Wexner Research Institute, Columbus, OH, USA. 5. The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, USA. 6. Division of Hematology/Oncology, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH, USA. 7. Center for Innovation and Pediatric Practice, Abigail Wexner Research Institute, Columbus, OH, USA. 8. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Research among adults shows benefits and low perceived burden of engaging in behavioral research. However, questions remain regarding the ethics of conducting behavioral research in pediatric populations during sensitive situations, including during a new life-threatening diagnosis or at end-of-life. We examined reactions to participating in a behavioral reproductive research study among male adolescents newly diagnosed with cancer and their parents, as a step towards optimizing fertility preservation utilization in a population where future infertility is common. METHODS: Pediatric literature regarding the ethics of behavioral research was reviewed. In our pilot, forty-four participants (19 mothers, 11 fathers, 14 male adolescents newly diagnosed with cancer) from 20 families completed demographic questionnaires and a fertility preservation decision tool developed by the study team. Qualitative interviews exploring the impact of study participation were subsequently conducted. Verbatim transcripts were coded for thematic content using the constant comparison method. RESULTS: Literature review showed positive reactions to research participation among youth/caregivers. In our pilot study, 89% (n = 17) of mothers, 64% (n = 7) of fathers, and 71% (n = 10) of adolescents reported at least one benefit of participating. Eleven percent (n = 2) of mothers, 36% (n = 4) of fathers, and 29% (n = 4) of adolescents said they were not affected; none of the participants reported a negative effect. CONCLUSION: Consistent with prior literature, our study suggests behavioral reproductive research prior to cancer treatment can offer direct benefits to participants and society, without increasing burden. These findings will inform future interventions to improve long-term psychosocial and reproductive outcomes for youth with cancer.
PURPOSE: Research among adults shows benefits and low perceived burden of engaging in behavioral research. However, questions remain regarding the ethics of conducting behavioral research in pediatric populations during sensitive situations, including during a new life-threatening diagnosis or at end-of-life. We examined reactions to participating in a behavioral reproductive research study among male adolescents newly diagnosed with cancer and their parents, as a step towards optimizing fertility preservation utilization in a population where future infertility is common. METHODS: Pediatric literature regarding the ethics of behavioral research was reviewed. In our pilot, forty-four participants (19 mothers, 11 fathers, 14 male adolescents newly diagnosed with cancer) from 20 families completed demographic questionnaires and a fertility preservation decision tool developed by the study team. Qualitative interviews exploring the impact of study participation were subsequently conducted. Verbatim transcripts were coded for thematic content using the constant comparison method. RESULTS: Literature review showed positive reactions to research participation among youth/caregivers. In our pilot study, 89% (n = 17) of mothers, 64% (n = 7) of fathers, and 71% (n = 10) of adolescents reported at least one benefit of participating. Eleven percent (n = 2) of mothers, 36% (n = 4) of fathers, and 29% (n = 4) of adolescents said they were not affected; none of the participants reported a negative effect. CONCLUSION: Consistent with prior literature, our study suggests behavioral reproductive research prior to cancer treatment can offer direct benefits to participants and society, without increasing burden. These findings will inform future interventions to improve long-term psychosocial and reproductive outcomes for youth with cancer.
Authors: Hayley Pessin; Michele Galietta; Christian J Nelson; Robert Brescia; Barry Rosenfeld; William Breitbart Journal: J Palliat Med Date: 2008-05 Impact factor: 2.947
Authors: Susan T Vadaparampil; Heather Clayton; Gwendolyn P Quinn; Lindsey M King; Michael Nieder; Crystal Wilson Journal: J Pediatr Oncol Nurs Date: 2007 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 1.636
Authors: Daniel M Green; Toana Kawashima; Marilyn Stovall; Wendy Leisenring; Charles A Sklar; Ann C Mertens; Sarah S Donaldson; Julianne Byrne; Leslie L Robison Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2009-11-30 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Eric Kodish; Michelle Eder; Robert B Noll; Kathleen Ruccione; Beverly Lange; Anne Angiolillo; Rebecca Pentz; Stephen Zyzanski; Laura A Siminoff; Dennis Drotar Journal: JAMA Date: 2004-01-28 Impact factor: 56.272