Literature DB >> 15470908

Variations in dose response with x-ray energy of LiF:Mg,Cu,P thermoluminescence dosimeters: implications for clinical dosimetry.

Lisa Duggan1, Claire Hood, Helen Warren-Forward, Mamoon Haque, Tomas Kron.   

Abstract

In many medical procedures where accurate radiation dose measurements are needed, the variation of detector response with x-ray energy is of concern. The response of LiF:Mg,Cu,P TLDs to a range of x-ray energies was analysed in monoenergetic (synchrotron), diagnostic and therapy radiation beams with the aim of implementing this dosimeter into clinical practice where existing dosimetry techniques are limited due to lack of sensitivity or tissue equivalence (e.g. neonatal radiography, mammography and brachytherapy). LiF:Mg,Cu,P TLDs in different forms from two manufacturers (MCP-N: TLD Poland, GR200: SDDML China) were irradiated using x-ray beams covering 10 keV to 18 MVp. Dose readings were compared with an ionization chamber. The effect of different TLD types and annealing cycles on clinical utility was investigated. The measured energy response of LiF:Mg,Cu,P TLDs was fit to a simple model devised by Kron et al (1998 Phys. Med. Biol. 43 3235-59) to describe the variation of TLD response with x-ray energy. If TLDs are handled as recommended in the present paper, the energy response of LiF:Mg,Cu,P deviates by a maximum of 15% from unity and agrees with the model to within 5% or experimental uncertainty between 15 keV and 10 MeV. LiF:Mg,Cu,P TLDs of all forms have consistent and superior energy response compared to the standard material LiF:Mg,Ti and are therefore suitable for a wide range of applications in diagnostic radiology and radiotherapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15470908     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/49/17/001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  16 in total

1.  Radiation exposure of medical staff from interventional x-ray procedures: a multicentre study.

Authors:  Uwe Häusler; Renate Czarwinski; Gunnar Brix
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-04-07       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Internal in vitro dosimetry for fish using hydroxyapatite-based EPR detectors.

Authors:  D V Ivanov; E A Shishkina; D I Osipov; R A Razumeev; E A Pryakhin
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2015-03-31       Impact factor: 1.925

3.  The effective dose assessment of C-arm CT in hepatic arterial embolisation therapy.

Authors:  Y-S Tyan; Y-Y Li; M-C Ku; H-H Huang; T-R Chen
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2013-02-12       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Comparison of organ and effective dose estimations from different Monte Carlo simulation-based software methods in infant CT and comparison with direct phantom measurements.

Authors:  Michael Lawson; Kemal Berk; Mohamed Badawy; Yujin Qi; Ahilan Kuganesan; Peter Metcalfe
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2022-05-06       Impact factor: 2.243

5.  Investigation of the entrance surface dose and dose to different organs in lumbar spine imaging.

Authors:  S Sina; B Zeinali; M Karimipoorfard; F Lotfalizadeh; M Sadeghi; E Zamani; R Faghihi
Journal:  J Biomed Phys Eng       Date:  2014-12-15

6.  Thermoluminescent and Monte Carlo dosimetry of IR06-103Pd brachytherapy source.

Authors:  Pooneh Saidi; Mahdi Sadeghi; S Hamed Hosseini; Claudio Tenreiro
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2011-11-15       Impact factor: 2.102

7.  Energy dependence and angular dependence of an optically stimulated luminescence dosimeter in the mammography energy range.

Authors:  Ai Kawaguchi; Yuta Matsunaga; Shoichi Suzuki; Koichi Chida
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2017-01-24       Impact factor: 2.102

8.  Comparison of TLD calibration methods for 192Ir dosimetry.

Authors:  Annette Haworth; Duncan J Butler; Lisa Wilfert; Martin A Ebert; Stephen P Todd; Anna J M Hayton; Tomas Kron
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2013-01-07       Impact factor: 2.102

9.  Experimental validation of a kV source model and dose computation method for CBCT imaging in an anthropomorphic phantom.

Authors:  Yannick Poirier; Mauro Tambasco
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2016-07-08       Impact factor: 2.102

10.  Out-of-field dose in stereotactic radiotherapy for paediatric patients.

Authors:  Lachlan Garrett; Nicholas Hardcastle; Adam Yeo; Peta Lonski; Rick Franich; Tomas Kron
Journal:  Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol       Date:  2021-06-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.