Literature DB >> 15460923

Mislocalizations of touch to a fake hand.

Erin L Austen1, Salvador Soto-Faraco, James T Enns, Alan Kingstone.   

Abstract

Observers can mislocalize a tactile target delivered to an unseen hand if a visible rubber glove is positioned next to a pair of distractor lights that flash in correlation with the tactile target (Pavani, Spence, & Driver, 2000). In the present study, we explored visual, tactile, and postural factors that influence this fake hand effect. Comparison with baseline conditions revealed that the fake hand effect was larger than a general spatial congruity effect but weaker than the effect obtained when tactile and visual stimuli were actually in the same locations (Experiment 1). Surprisingly, the effect did not depend on direct vision of the fake hand (Experiments 1 and 2), nor was it enhanced by congruent tactile information (Experiment 3). However, the fake hand effect was sensitive to the postural compatibility of the real and the fake hands (Experiment 4). These findings indicate that the available sensory information is used flexibly to incorporate the rubber glove into the body schema.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15460923     DOI: 10.3758/cabn.4.2.170

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci        ISSN: 1530-7026            Impact factor:   3.282


  18 in total

1.  Tool-use changes multimodal spatial interactions between vision and touch in normal humans.

Authors:  Angelo Maravita; Charles Spence; Steffan Kennett; Jon Driver
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2002-03

2.  Vision influences tactile perception at body sites that cannot be viewed directly.

Authors:  S P Tipper; N Phillips; C Dancer; D Lloyd; L A Howard; F McGlone
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Tactile selective attention and body posture: assessing the multisensory contributions of vision and proprioception.

Authors:  Salvador Soto-Faraco; Angelica Ronald; Charles Spence
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2004-10

4.  Direction of gaze during vibrotactile choice reaction time tasks.

Authors:  J M Pierson; J L Bradshaw; T F Meyer; M J Howard; J A Bradshaw
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 3.139

5.  Vision and touch.

Authors:  I Rock; C S Harris
Journal:  Sci Am       Date:  1967-05       Impact factor: 2.142

6.  Rubber hands 'feel' touch that eyes see.

Authors:  M Botvinick; J Cohen
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1998-02-19       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Direct evidence from parietal extinction of enhancement of visual attention near a visible hand.

Authors:  F Frassinetti
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2000-11-16       Impact factor: 10.834

8.  Seeing or not seeing where your hands are.

Authors:  E Làdavas; A Farnè; G Zeloni; G di Pellegrino
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Visual capture of touch: out-of-the-body experiences with rubber gloves.

Authors:  F Pavani; C Spence; J Driver
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2000-09

10.  Cross-modal selective attention: on the difficulty of ignoring sounds at the locus of visual attention.

Authors:  C Spence; J Ranson; J Driver
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2000-02
View more
  27 in total

1.  Integration of visual and tactile stimuli: top-down influences require time.

Authors:  David I Shore; Nevena Simic
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-08-06       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Alleviating the 'crossed-hands' deficit by seeing uncrossed rubber hands.

Authors:  Elena Azañón; Salvador Soto-Faraco
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-07-21       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  The selective effect of the image of a hand on visuotactile interactions as assessed by performance on the crossmodal congruency task.

Authors:  Yuka Igarashi; Yota Kimura; Charles Spence; Shigeru Ichihara
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-08-29       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Optokinetic stimulation induces illusory movement of both out-of-the-body and on-the-body hand-held visual objects.

Authors:  P Revol; A Farnè; L Pisella; N P Holmes; A Imai; K Susami; K Koga; Y Rossetti
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-02-08       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Eye position affects the perceived location of touch.

Authors:  Vanessa Harrar; Laurence R Harris
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-06-17       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Proprioceptive signals contribute to the sense of body ownership.

Authors:  Lee D Walsh; G Lorimer Moseley; Janet L Taylor; Simon C Gandevia
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2011-04-26       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  Kinaesthetic mirror illusion and spatial congruence.

Authors:  Morgane Metral; Marie Chancel; Clémentine Brun; Marion Luyat; Anne Kavounoudias; Michel Guerraz
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-02-11       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  The body beyond the body: expectation of a sensory event is enough to induce ownership over a fake hand.

Authors:  Francesca Ferri; Antonio Maria Chiarelli; Arcangelo Merla; Vittorio Gallese; Marcello Costantini
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-06-26       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Visuotactile learning and body representation: an ERP study with rubber hands and rubber objects.

Authors:  Clare Press; Cecilia Heyes; Patrick Haggard; Martin Eimer
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  Keeping in touch with one's self: multisensory mechanisms of self-consciousness.

Authors:  Jane E Aspell; Bigna Lenggenhager; Olaf Blanke
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-08-05       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.