Literature DB >> 11497057

Vision influences tactile perception at body sites that cannot be viewed directly.

S P Tipper1, N Phillips, C Dancer, D Lloyd, L A Howard, F McGlone.   

Abstract

Previous research has demonstrated that vision of a body site, without proprioceptive orienting of eye and head to that site, could affect tactile perception. The body site viewed was the hand, which can be seen directly under normal viewing conditions. The current research asked three further questions: First, can vision similarly affect tactile perception at a body site that cannot normally be viewed directly such as the face or neck? Second, does prior experience of seeing a body site, such as occurs when viewing the face in mirrors, produce larger effects of viewing than body sites rarely seen such as the back of the neck? And third, how quickly can visual information affect tactile target detection? We observe that: detection of tactile targets at these body sites was influenced by whether or not they were viewed, this effect was greater when viewing the more familiar site of the face than that of the neck, and significant effects were observed when the stimulus onset asynchrony between visual display and tactile target was as little as 200 ms.

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11497057     DOI: 10.1007/s002210100743

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  31 in total

1.  Neural mechanisms underlying reaching for remembered targets cued kinesthetically or visually in left or right hemispace.

Authors:  Andrew J Butler; Gereon R Fink; Christian Dohle; Gilbert Wunderlich; Lutz Tellmann; Rudiger J Seitz; Karl Zilles; Hans-Joachim Freund
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Visual enhancement of touch in spatial body representation.

Authors:  Clare Press; Marisa Taylor-Clarke; Steffan Kennett; Patrick Haggard
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-09-18       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Vision of a pictorial hand modulates visual-tactile interactions.

Authors:  Yuka Igarashi; Norimichi Kitagawa; Shigeru Ichihara
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.282

4.  Mislocalizations of touch to a fake hand.

Authors:  Erin L Austen; Salvador Soto-Faraco; James T Enns; Alan Kingstone
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.282

5.  Touch used to guide action is partially coded in a visual reference frame.

Authors:  Vanessa Harrar; Laurence R Harris
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-04-29       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Vision and gaze direction modulate tactile processing in somatosensory cortex: evidence from event-related brain potentials.

Authors:  Bettina Forster; Martin Eimer
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-05-10       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Alleviating the 'crossed-hands' deficit by seeing uncrossed rubber hands.

Authors:  Elena Azañón; Salvador Soto-Faraco
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-07-21       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  The selective effect of the image of a hand on visuotactile interactions as assessed by performance on the crossmodal congruency task.

Authors:  Yuka Igarashi; Yota Kimura; Charles Spence; Shigeru Ichihara
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-08-29       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Sound enhances touch perception.

Authors:  Tony Ro; Johanan Hsu; Nafi E Yasar; L Caitlin Elmore; Michael S Beauchamp
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-03-21       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  When right feels left: referral of touch and ownership between the hands.

Authors:  Valeria I Petkova; H Henrik Ehrsson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-09-09       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.