Literature DB >> 15457382

The learning curve for a colonoscopy simulator in the absence of any feedback: no feedback, no learning.

T Mahmood1, A Darzi.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The hypothesis of this study is that working on the simulator without a structured feedback does not change performance; hence, any effects shown after structured feedback would amount to useful learning of the procedure. The aim was to investigate the learning curve for the HT Immersion Medical Colonoscopy Simulator without any structured feedback. This could then be potentially applied to validate the learning curve on the simulator when structured feedback is provided. There are no previous studies on this matter.
METHODS: Candidates were asked to perform colonoscopy on the HT Immersion Medical Colonoscopy Simulator. Modules 3 and 4 were used at random. In total, each candidate was asked to perform five consecutive virtual colonoscopies on the same module. These five episodes were collectively referred to as one trial. A time result of 3,600 sec (1 h) was used to denote perforation. No guidance or feedback was given to candidates before, during, or after each procedure. A total of 26 postgraduate doctors were recruited, including nine research fellows, five preregistration house officers, six specialist registrars, and six consultants. Fourteen candidates recorded five attempts each (i.e., one trial each) on the same module of the colonoscopy simulator (14 trials over 70 episodes). Another 12 candidates recorded five attempts (i.e., one trial each) on two modules of the colonoscopy simulator (24 trials over 120 episodes). Hence, 190 episodes were recorded in total, representing 38 trials.
RESULTS: There was no improvement in performance on the simulator from first attempt to the fifth in the absence of feedback. If there was any initial gain in any measurable outcome, this was lost in subsequent attempts indicating lack of learning. The outcomes measured included time taken to complete the test, percentage of the mucosa visualized, depth of the instrument inserted, and the path length used. The results were statistically significant for all outcomes.
CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that in the absence of feedback, it is not possible to improve performance on the HT Immersion Medical Colonoscopy Simulator. Thus, there is no learning curve for the machine. The information from this study is vital for using the simulators in training and assessment because any improvement in learning curves shown after training on simulators can be presumed to be due to learning the procedure and not the simulator.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15457382     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-003-9143-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  7 in total

1.  Quantifying physician teaching productivity using clinical relative value units.

Authors:  M M Yeh; D F Cahill
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Learning rate for laparoscopic surgical skills on MIST VR, a virtual reality simulator: quality of human-computer interface.

Authors:  A Chaudhry; C Sutton; J Wood; R Stone; R McCloy
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 1.891

3.  Reforming higher specialist training in the United Kingdom--a step along the continuum of medical education.

Authors:  K C Calman; J G Temple; R Naysmith; R G Cairncross; S J Bennett
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 6.251

4.  Training in sigmoidoscopy: the experience of trainees in elderly medicine in East Anglia.

Authors:  R H Mallinson
Journal:  Int J Clin Pract       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 5.  Training simulators and education in gastrointestinal endoscopy: current status and perspectives in 2001.

Authors:  J Hochberger; J Maiss; B Magdeburg; J Cohen; E G Hahn
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 10.093

Review 6.  The art of endoscopic instruction.

Authors:  M V Sivak
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am       Date:  1995-04

Review 7.  Providing feedback.

Authors:  P O Katz
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am       Date:  1995-04
  7 in total
  38 in total

1.  The perception of gastroenterology fellows towards the relationship between hand size and endoscopic training.

Authors:  Daniel L Cohen; Jahnavi R Naik; Leonardo J Tamariz; Ryan D Madanick
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2007-11-09       Impact factor: 3.199

2.  How much feedback is necessary for learning to suture?

Authors:  A O'Connor; S D Schwaitzberg; C G L Cao
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-11-01       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Mental training in surgical education: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Rajesh Aggarwal; Oliver Warren; Ara Darzi
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Acquiring basic endoscopy skills by training on the GI Mentor II.

Authors:  S N Buzink; A D Koch; J Heemskerk; S M B I Botden; R H M Goossens; H de Ridder; E J Schoon; J J Jakimowicz
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-05-05       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Canadian credentialing guidelines for colonoscopy.

Authors:  J Romagnuolo; R Enns; T Ponich; J Springer; D Armstrong; A N Barkun
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 3.522

6.  Web-based system for training and dissemination of a magnification chromoendoscopy classification.

Authors:  Mario Dinis-Ribeiro; Ricardo Correia; Cristina Santos; Sonia Fernandes; Ernesto Palhares; Rui-Almeida Silva; Pedro Amaro; Miguel Areia; Altamiro Costa-Pereira; Luis Moreira-Dias
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-12-14       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  How should we train capsule endoscopy? A pilot study of performance changes during a structured capsule endoscopy training program.

Authors:  Aymer Postgate; Adam Haycock; Aine Fitzpatrick; Gill Schofield; Paul Bassett; Siwan Thomas-Gibson; Chris Fraser
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2008-11-26       Impact factor: 3.199

8.  Assessment of early learning curves among nurses and physicians using a high-fidelity virtual-reality colonoscopy simulator.

Authors:  Irina Kruglikova; Teodor P Grantcharov; Asbjorn M Drewes; Peter Funch-Jensen
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-06-18       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Association Between Hospital Debriefing Practices With Adherence to Resuscitation Process Measures and Outcomes for In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest.

Authors:  Ali O Malik; Brahmajee K Nallamothu; Brad Trumpower; Marci Kennedy; Sarah L Krein; Khaja M Chinnakondepalli; Vittal Hejjaji; Paul S Chan
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes       Date:  2020-11-17

10.  Feedback in laparoscopic skills acquisition: an observational study during a basic skills training course.

Authors:  B E Schaafsma; E Hiemstra; J Dankelman; F W Jansen
Journal:  Gynecol Surg       Date:  2009-04-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.