Literature DB >> 10615201

Learning rate for laparoscopic surgical skills on MIST VR, a virtual reality simulator: quality of human-computer interface.

A Chaudhry1, C Sutton, J Wood, R Stone, R McCloy.   

Abstract

Acquiring laparoscopic surgical skills involves initial learning of cognitive and motor skills followed by refinement of those skills. The successful use of a virtual reality simulator depends on the quality of the interface for the human-computer interaction and this can be determined by the initial learning rate. MIST VR, a part-task virtual reality laparoscopic simulator, provides objective assessment of psychomotor skills and can generate an overall score for performance, based upon errors made and time taken for six different tasks. This study analysed the rate of early task/instrument/computer familiarization on consecutive scores achieved by surgically experienced and naive individuals. Eleven surgeons, 18 medical students and seven non-medical personnel were tested on the simulator up to ten consecutive times, within a 2-week period. Performance data from every task and repetition were analysed to obtain individual scores of task performance. The calculation of overall score penalized errors far more heavily than total time taken, with high scores indicating poor performance. The surgeon-computer interface generated a rapid and significant early familiarization curve up to the third session on the simulator, with significant reductions in both time taken and total contact errors made. These results suggest that MIST VR represents a high quality interface. Surgeons scored consistently and significantly better than other subjects on all tasks. For surgically naive individuals, it was possible to predict the level of laparoscopic skills performance that would be attained after overcoming initial simulator learning curve, by studying their initial score. Overall scores reflected surgical experience and suggest that the simulator is measuring surgically relevant parameters. MIST VR provides a validated and much needed method for objective assessment of laparoscopic skills, for a variety of surgical disciplines.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10615201      PMCID: PMC2503263     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl        ISSN: 0035-8843            Impact factor:   1.891


  5 in total

1.  Impact of laparoscopic cholecystectomy on surgical training.

Authors:  N J Shaper; M Harrison; T Bates
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 1.891

2.  MIST VR: a virtual reality trainer for laparoscopic surgery assesses performance.

Authors:  M S Wilson; A Middlebrook; C Sutton; R Stone; R F McCloy
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 1.891

3.  Minimally invasive surgery. Future developments.

Authors:  J E Wickham
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1994-01-15

4.  Variability in the clinical skills of residents entering training programs in surgery.

Authors:  A K Sachdeva; L A Loiacono; G E Amiel; P G Blair; M Friedman; J J Roslyn
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 3.982

5.  Improving interface quality: an investigation of human-computer interaction task learning.

Authors:  D A Mitta; S J Packebush
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 2.778

  5 in total
  40 in total

1.  Laparoscopic performance after one night on call in a surgical department: prospective study.

Authors:  T P Grantcharov; L Bardram; P Funch-Jensen; J Rosenberg
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-11-24

2.  Assessment of surgical competence.

Authors:  A Darzi; S Mackay
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  2001-12

Review 3.  Science, medicine, and the future. Virtual reality in surgery.

Authors:  R McCloy; R Stone
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-10-20

4.  Can tonic accommodation predict surgical performance?

Authors:  J Shah; I Paul; D Buckley; H Davis; J P Frisby; A Darzi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-02-17       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Construct validity: experts and novices performing on the Xitact LS500 laparoscopy simulator.

Authors:  M Schijven; J Jakimowicz
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-02-17       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  The intercollegiate Basic Surgical Skills Course.

Authors:  M Schijven; R Klaassen; J Jakimowicz; O T Terpstra
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-10-23       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Training in tasks with different visual-spatial components does not improve virtual arthroscopy performance.

Authors:  P Ström; A Kjellin; L Hedman; T Wredmark; L Felländer-Tsai
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-11-21       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Depth cue reliance in surgeons and medical students.

Authors:  J Shah; D Buckley; J Frisby; A Darzi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-06-17       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  A study to validate the colonoscopy simulator.

Authors:  T Mahmood; A Darzi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-08-15       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Multiple Objective Measures of Skill (MOMS): a new approach to the assessment of technical ability in surgical trainees.

Authors:  Sean Mackay; Vivek Datta; Avril Chang; Jyoti Shah; Roger Kneebone; Ara Darzi
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 12.969

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.